Pastor Statistics (US)

Here are the statistics on pastors that I refer to from time to time.  There is much reason to be concerned based on this information.  Personally I feel God has called me to be a pastor for life and to serve at The Ridge Fellowship (www.ridgefellowship.com).  This information serves as a bull horn to remind me to take the necessary steps to be healthy and balanced.

Statistics on Pastors – from the Francis Schaeffer Institute

We found that over 70% of pastors are so stressed out and burned out that they regularly consider leaving the ministry

From our recent research we did to retest our data, 1050 pastors were surveyed from two pastor’s conferences held in Orange County and Pasadena, Ca—416 in 2005, and 634 in 2006 (I conducted a similar study for the Fuller Institute in the late 80s with a much greater sampling).

  • Nine hundred forty-eight (948 or 90%) of pastors stated they are frequently fatigued, and worn out on a weekly and even daily basis (did not say burned out).
  • Nine hundred thirty-five, (935 or 89%) of the pastors we surveyed also considered leaving the ministry at one time. Five hundred ninety, (590 or 57%) said they would leave if they had a better place to go—including secular work.
  • Eight hundred eight (808 or 77%) of the pastors we surveyed felt they did not have a good marriage!
  • Seven hundred ninety (790 or 75%) of the pastors we surveyed felt they were unqualified and/or poorly trained by their seminaries to lead and manage the church or to counsel others. This left them disheartened in their ability to pastor.
  • Seven hundred fifty-six (756 or 72%) of the pastors we surveyed stated that they only studied the Bible when they were preparing for sermons or lessons. This left only 38% who read the Bible for devotions and personal study.
  • Eight hundred two (802 or 71%) of pastors stated they were burned out, and they battle depression beyond fatigue on a weekly and even a daily basis.
  • Three hundred ninety-nine (399 or 38%) of pastors said they were divorced or currently in a divorce process.
  • Three hundred fifteen (315 or 30%) said they had either been in an ongoing affair or a one-time sexual encounter with a parishioner.
  • Two hundred forty-one (241 or 23%) of the pastors we surveyed said they felt happy and content on a regular basis with who they are in Christ, in their church, and in their home!

Here is research that we distilled from Barna, Focus on the Family, and Fuller Seminary, all of which backed up our findings, and additional information from reviewing others’ research:

  • Fifteen hundred pastors leave the ministry each month due to moral failure, spiritual burnout, or contention in their churches.
  • Fifty percent of pastors’ marriages will end in divorce.
  • Eighty percent of pastors feel unqualified and discouraged in their role as pastor.
  • Fifty percent of pastors are so discouraged that they would leave the ministry if they could, but have no other way of making a living.
  • Eighty percent of seminary and Bible school graduates who enter the ministry will leave the ministry within the first five years.
  • Seventy percent of pastors constantly fight depression.
  • Almost forty percent polled said they have had an extra-marital affair since beginning their ministry.

Most statistics say that 60% to 80% of those who enter the ministry will not still be in it 10 years later, and only a fraction will stay in it as a lifetime career. Many pastors—I believe over 90 percent—start off right with a true call and the enthusiasm and the endurance of faith to make it, but something happens to derail their train of passion and love for the call.

Focus on the Family has reported (http://www.parsonage.org/) that we in the United States lose a pastor a day because he seeks an immoral path instead of God’s, seeking intimacy where it must not be found. F.O.F. statistics state that 70% of pastors do not have close personal friends, and no one in whom to confide. They also said about 35% of pastors personally deal with sexual sin. In addition, that 25% of pastors are divorced.

Out of the 1050 pastors we surveyed during two pastors conferences held in Pasadena, California, 825, or 78% (326 in 2005 and 499 in 2006) said they were forced to resign from a church at least once. Sixty-three percent (63%) said they had been fired from their pastoral position at least twice. In the survey, we asked why they were fired—from the reasons given by the church board versus what they felt the reason was. We laid out 15 categories with a blank space to fill out what we may have missed: poor leadership, conflict with key staff or lay leadership, gossip, lack of funding, doctrinal divide, hardship on family, not connecting with membership, power plays, church council refusing to resolve conflict, resistance to their teaching, resistance to their leadership style or vision, failure to teach biblically, poor people skills, failure to follow job description, inappropriate relationship, or other sin. They gave us a top five main explanations on a scale of one to five, with few (8%) reporting on any of the other categories. These stats are based on number one response; at the same time, over 70% of pastors stated three of these five reasons. Here is the order (these findings have been retested and back up in internet polls done since 1998, and church survey studies done since 1980:

  1. Four hundred twelve (412 or 52%) stated that the number one reason was organizational and control issues. A conflict arose that forced them out based on who was going to lead and manage the church—pastor, elder, key lay person, faction, …
  2. One hundred ninety (190 or 24%) stated that the number one reason was their church was already in such a significant degree of conflict, the pastor’s approach could not resolve it (over 80% of pastors stated this as number 2 if not already stated as number one, and for the rest, it was number 3!).
  3. One hundred nineteen (119 or 14%) stated the number one reason to be that the church was resistance to their leadership, vision, teaching, or to change, or that their leadership was too strong or too fast.
  4. Sixty four (64 or 8%) stated the number one reason to be that the church was not connecting with them on a personal level or they could not connect with them, or the church over-admired the previous pastor and would not accept them.
  5. Forty (40 or 5%) stated that the number one reason was not having the appropriate relational or connecting skills as a pastor.
  6. The other significant study of pastors that held similar results as ours was conducted by psychologist Richard Blackmon (with ties to Fuller Seminary and Dr. Archibald Heart), also reported by the Los Angeles Times newspaper. In 1985 as well as more recently too, Blackmon surveyed one thousand pastors from four major denominations in California, USA. His research, which was ongoing up to 2004, revealed that over 75% of ministers are extremely or highly stressed. He even found that 31.75% of the clergy surveyed had sexual intercourse with a church member—who was not their spouse! In addition, he found that 30% to 40% of ministers ultimately drop out of the ministry. His research goes on to say the average insurance costs to churches for dealing with mental breakdowns with clergy is four percent higher than any secular industry. Blackmon states that the significance of the stress is mainly based in the areas of personal finances, church finances, building issues, recruitment of volunteers, counseling issues, and visitation. Sermon preparation and teaching seem to be last on his list!

The stress, according to Blackmon, is a primary result of the continual, intense, care responsibility of pastors compared to a medical doctor who will see a terminally ill patient for an hour or so, then see them again in a few weeks. He suggests that the pastor must set personal limits for himself to maintain balance, develop relationships outside of the church, and to be in a support group with other pastors. Very good advice!

 Source:  Francis Schaeffer Institute, Statistics on Pastors, By Dr. Richard J. Krejcir

For more see:

http://www.intothyword.org/apps/articles/default.asp?articleid=36562

Posted in Current Events in the US Church | 1 Comment

Church Decline Statistics (US)

• Approximately 4,000 churches close their doors every year while only 1,000 new churches are opened!

16% of churches received no new members. 13% even reported having no children as members!   HALF the churches in the US did not reach one person for Christ in the last year!

• From 1990-2000 the US population increased 11.4% (24,153,000) yet the combined membership of Protestant denominations decreased by 9.5% (4,498,242).

Every mainline Protestant Church in the US is in decline in the past 20 years:

  • Presbyterian  -24%  (for example in 1995 alone they lost 100,000 members)
  • Episcopal   – 20%
  • United Methodist     – 16%
  • Church of Christ  -15%
  • Even the Southern Baptists who had been growing until recently, as of 2013 have declined 5.5%.
  • Except the Assemblies of God membership which grew by 1.4% in 2013

(Keep in mind that natural church attrition is -10%.  People die, move and stop coming.  For The Ridge – www.ridgefellowship.com   to grow by 10% we have to really grow by 20% due to natural attrition.)

• Not a single county in America has a greater percentage of “churched persons” than 10 years ago!

• In 1900 – 27 churches for every 10,000 Americans.
• In 1950 – 17 churches for every 10,000 Americans.
• In 2000 – Less than 11 churches for every 10,000 Americans.

18.0% of Americans attended in church in 2002.   Soon, we can catch up with Europe, which is currently “enjoying” two to four percent of its population in regular Church attendance.

The United States now ranks third (3rd) following China and India in the number of people who are not professing Christians; in other words, the U.S. is becoming an ever-increasing “un-reached people group.”

Isn’t it time to reverse these statistics?  Will you join with me in prayer, fasting, and hard work to reach our country for Christ?   Darrell

Sources:

Hartford Institute for Religion Research. “Fast Facts about American Religion” 01 Jan. 2008

Home Missions Agency of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church. “Church Growth Statistics” 01 Jan. 2008

Lindner, Eileen W. 2007 Yearbook of American & Canadian Churches. Abingdon Press. Nashville, TN. 2006

Marshall, Peter and David Manuel. The Light & the Glory. Fleming H. Revell Co. Old Tappan, NJ. 1977.

Phillips, Timothy R. and Dennis L. Okholm. A Family of Faith: An Introduction to Evangelical Christianity. Baker Academic. Grand Rapids, MI. 2001.

R. J. Krejcir Ph.D. Francis A. Schaeffer Institute of Church Leadership Development © 2007 (research from 1998 to 2006)

White, James Emery Rethinking the Church, 2003

http://www.charismanews.com/us/39838-southern-baptist-churches-growing-in-numbers-declining-in-membership  (1/20/13)

Click to access Online%20Stats%202013.pdf

Posted in Current Events in the US Church | 5 Comments

Philemon (Verses 17-25)

“It takes more than love to solve a problem; love must pay a price.  God does not save us by His love, He paid the debt for us!”   In the verses today, Paul makes two suggestions:

1. “Receive the slave as myself,” and “2. Put that [whatever he stole from you] on my account.”  This is an illustration of what Jesus Christ has done for us as believers.  We are so identified with Jesus Christ that God receives us as He receives His Son!  Plus He paid our debt!  

Here are the last verses of Philemon: 

A Partnership with Paul  (17-25)

17 So if you consider me your partner, welcome him as you would welcome me.NRSV

In this verse Paul stated his request: welcome him. Like the father of the prodigal son in Jesus’ parable, Philemon should open his arms to welcome Onesimus back to his household and, as a new believer, to the church. God had welcomed Onesimus; so should Philemon.

The word partner is koinonon from the word koinonia, meaning fellowship or sharing

Philemon and Paul shared the koinonia described in verse 6. Paul wanted Philemon’s attitude toward Onesimus to be based on his attitude toward Paul. If Paul and Philemon had fellowship, then Philemon would have to include Onesimus as well. Paul was relying on his relationship with Philemon (their fellowship and partnership) to cause Philemon to welcome Onesimus as he would welcome Paul (v. 12).

 LIFE APPLICATION  –  PARTNERS

Paul called Philemon his “partner,” but he did not mean a partner in the business sense of the word. Philemon was a partner in grace. Paul and Philemon shared the same experience in Jesus Christ of being saved; in that sense, they were equals. Too often our relationships in the church don’t possess true partnership but reflect merely tolerance of one another. Do you have room in your heart to welcome other believers warmly? Treat them as companions in God’s grace and love, not just fellow workers. Let your common interests in Christ and your common feeling of gratitude for Christ’s love knit you together with others.

18 If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge it to me.NIV Onesimus may have confessed some such act to Paul. The only way Onesimus could have financed his flight was to have stolen from his master money or possessions that he could sell. Even if not, he still would be in debt for the work that had not been performed in his absence. This would cause Onesimus to be extremely afraid to return to his master. It was bad enough that he had run away, but if he had also stolen money or possessions or had wronged his master in any other way, he would be in deep trouble.  Paul’s letter served as a buffer—giving Onesimus courage to return and giving Philemon the entire picture so that he might deal kindly with his slave.

Any money or possessions that Onesimus had taken certainly were long gone. Onesimus had no means to repay. Paul asked that any money stolen be charged (elloga is an accounting term) to his own account; in other words, Onesimus no longer would owe Philemon anything, but Paul would. Paul was not suggesting to Philemon that he simply forgive Onesimus’s debt; the wrong needed to be righted. Instead, Paul took on that debt on Onesimus’s behalf. Onesimus would never know whether the debt was actually demanded and repaid. All he knew was that a debt needed to be paid because of his wrong actions—but that someone else was going to pay it for him. Onesimus got a dose of true Christian love through Paul’s action.

LIFE APPLICATION – WORTHY INVESTMENTS

Paul genuinely loved Onesimus. Paul showed his love by personally guaranteeing payment for any stolen goods or wrongs for which Onesimus might be responsible. Paul’s investment in the life of this new believer certainly encouraged and strengthened Onesimus’s faith. Are there young believers who need you to demonstrate such self-sacrifice toward them? Be grateful when you can invest in people, helping them with Bible study, prayer, encouragement, support, and friendship.

19 I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand: I will repay it.NRSV Often Paul would use a secretary to write his letters as he dictated them (see Romans 16:22). But sometimes at the end of the letters, he would take the pen and write a few words in order to authenticate the letters (see, for example, Galatians 6:11; Colossians 4:18). Most likely this entire letter was written in his own hand, for it was a personal letter to a personal friend. This letter was short, not filled with doctrinal teachings; it would be more effective if written by Paul. For Paul to write again the words I will repay it emphasized that he was placing himself under legal obligation to do so. Paul was not “just saying” this to placate Philemon; he meant to do so by putting it in writing. If Philemon had demanded repayment, Paul would have had to do it.

I say nothing about your owing me even your own self.NRSV It seems that Paul knew his friend well enough to know that he would not demand repayment (vv. 19-21), but this does not lessen Paul’s generous action toward Onesimus, who knew only that someone else was paying for his wrongdoing. While Paul told Philemon to put Onesimus’s charge on Paul’s “page” in the accounting book, Paul also reminded Philemon that he (Paul) had a huge credit already, in that Philemon owed himself (that is, his conversion, his true self in Christ) to Paul. Once Onesimus’s debt was put on Paul’s page, it would be cancelled. As Philemon’s spiritual father, Paul was hoping that Philemon would feel a debt of gratitude that would cause him to accept Onesimus with a spirit of forgiveness.

LIFE APPLICATION  – REFRESH THEIR HEARTS

Have you benefited from the ministry of others? Has there been a pastor, youth worker, or Sunday school teacher whose guidance and faithfulness stimulated you to grow in Christ? Consider how you may refresh their hearts with some word of encouragement or some thoughtful gift. Let them know that you have followed their examples by being faithful to Christ.

20 I do wish, brother, that I may have some benefit from you in the Lord; refresh my heart in Christ.NIV Again Paul called Philemon brother. In the matters of ledgers and debts, once Onesimus’s debt was repaid, Paul would still have a credit, for who can ever repay someone for bringing him or her to eternal life?  Paul asked that the balance be paid in kindness to Onesimus. The Greek word translated some benefit is onaimen, a word sounding much like Onesimus. Onesimus had benefited Paul (v. 11); Paul hoped that Philemon would do likewise. And as Philemon had refreshed the hearts of the saints (v. 7), he could hardly do other than refresh Paul’s heart as well. The word my is emphatic in the Greek. It is as if Paul were saying, “It is my turn to be refreshed by you.”

21 Confident of your obedience, I write to you, knowing that you will do even more than I ask.NIV Paul’s use of the word obedience seems strong in contrast to how he had carefully worded his request throughout this letter. He may have been alluding to his apostolic authority at which he had hinted previously in the letter but had chosen not to use (v. 8), preferring instead to let Philemon’s act be voluntary (v. 14). But the word “obedience” is more flexible in Greek than in English and does not mean that Paul had been issuing orders. Instead, “obedience” here indicates a person’s response to God’s will. Paul wanted Philemon to obey in the sense of following God’s will.

Paul was not only confident that Philemon would welcome Onesimus back, but that Philemon would also do even more than Paul asked. This may have been a hint that Philemon would willingly free Onesimus so that he could return to Paul or be freed when Paul got to Colosse. We can be sure that Philemon welcomed Onesimus, but the “even more” is left unknown.

22 One thing more—prepare a guest room for me, for I am hoping through your prayers to be restored to you.NRSV That Paul would ask Philemon to prepare a guest room in his home indicates that Paul expected to be released (see also Philippians 2:23-24). Some feel that this was Paul’s way of reminding Philemon of his apostolic authority. Or it may have been a tongue-in-cheek way of securing a kindly reception for Onesimus because Paul hoped to eventually arrive to check up on what had occurred. It is more likely that Paul was simply hoping to eventually visit these friends who had been praying for him.

His freedom would be secured through these prayers. The words your and you are plural, focusing on Philemon, Apphia, Archippus, and the church in Philemon’s house. Paul had never been to Colosse; the word restored in Greek simply means “granted” or “given as a gift” (the root of the word is charis, “grace”). For Philemon and the church in his home to have their prayers answered with a visit from Paul would indeed be a gift of grace. Paul was released from prison soon after writing this letter, but the Bible doesn’t say whether he went to Colosse.

23 Epaphras, my fellow prisoner in Christ Jesus, greets you.NKJV The you in this verse is singular. These are personal greetings to Philemon. Epaphras was well known to the Colossians because he had founded the church there (Colossians 1:7), perhaps while Paul was living in Ephesus (Acts 19:10). Epaphras may have been converted in Ephesus and then had returned to Colosse, his hometown. He was a hero to this church, helping to hold it together in spite of growing persecution and struggles with false doctrine. His report to Paul about the problems in Colosse had prompted Paul to write his letter to the Colossians. Epaphras’s greetings to and prayers for the Colossian Christians reveal his deep love for them (Colossians 4:12-13).

It is unclear whether Epaphras was actually in prison with Paul. Paul’s words fellow prisoner in Christ Jesus may have been a metaphor of warfare or “captivity to Christ.” It is more likely that Epaphras was with Paul voluntarily and would return to Colosse.

24 And so do Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke, my fellow workers.NRSV Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke are also mentioned in Colossians 4:10, 14. Mark had accompanied Paul and Barnabas on their first missionary journey (Acts 12:25ff.) and eventually wrote the Gospel of Mark. Luke had accompanied Paul on his third missionary journey and was the writer of the Gospel of Luke and the book of Acts. Demas had been faithful to Paul for a while but then had deserted him (see 2 Timothy 4:10). Paul had sent greetings from these same people in the letter to the Colossians. But in that letter, a man “Jesus who is called Justus” also had sent greetings to Colosse. Much speculation has been done as to why his greetings were not included here, but it may simply have been that he was absent on the day Paul wrote this letter to Philemon.

25 The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit.NRSV The word your is plural, indicating that Paul sent this final blessing not to Philemon only, but to the entire church that regularly met in his home (v. 2). As Paul had begun his letter with “grace” (v. 3), so he ended it with the benediction that the believers would continue to experience God’s unmerited favor. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ is with Christians’ spirits because the Spirit of Jesus Christ indwells the spirits (the inner selves) of believers (see Romans 8:9-11).

While this is Paul’s standard benediction, it certainly had special meaning to Philemon. It would take God’s grace working in Philemon to enable him to do something difficult, something unnatural—forgiving, welcoming, and accepting into the fellowship as a brother a slave who had, at least at a previous time, proven himself to be unfaithful and untrustworthy. It would be through God’s grace alone that this reconciliation would be possible. Yet the grace was available; Philemon only had to act upon it. If the entire letter was meant to be read to the church that met in Philemon’s home, then they too would, by God’s grace, also need to welcome and accept Onesimus. God’s grace, working in the spirits of believers, makes true fellowship and reconciliation possible within any body of believers.

LIFE APPLICATION – TRANSFORMATION

Paul urged Philemon to be reconciled to his slave, receiving him as a brother and fellow member of God’s family. “Reconciliation” means reestablishing relationship. Christ has reconciled us to God and to others. Many barriers come between people—race, social status, sex, personality differences—but Christ can break down these barriers. Jesus Christ changed Onesimus’s relationship with Philemon from slave to brother. Christ can transform our most hopeless relationships into deep and loving friendships.

 The more we look at the book of Philemon, the more we see of the hand of God.  Onesimus fled across the Roman empire trying to escape his master only to meet the very man to that his master owed his spiritual life—and found spiritual life himself! How he must have known this was no random accident.

The wrong things that you have done, the places that you have run away from, the things that you did, or that have been done to you, can be turned into the very things that bring you to Christ.

 So what happened to Onesimus?  Did Philemon grant Paul’s request?    You’ll have to listen to the last message in this series to find out!   http://ridgefellowship.org/messages/singleseries/10033.html

 Darrell

Sources:
— Bible Exposition Commentary (BE Series) – New Testament
— Life Application Bible Commentary
— Preaching the Word
Posted in Released (Philemon) | Leave a comment

Philemon (Verses 8-16)

In these verses we see the picture of a man greatly changed—changed by Christ. It shows us the difference that a commitment to Christ should make in a life and just how we should receive a person who has made that commitment. By the way,  Onesimus was a slave and a thief. Few people would ever want to hang around a slave much less be known as a brother to him. Yet, this is exactly what we are about to see. No matter how low or different a person is from us, we are to reach out to him and do all we can to help that person know Christ and be a part of His church. This is a clear picture of a man changed by Christ.

PAUL’S REQUEST FOR ONESIMUS / 8-16

While in prison, Paul had led Onesimus to Christ. So he asked Philemon to forgive his runaway slave who had become a Christ follower and, even going beyond forgiveness, to accept Onesimus as a brother. As believers, we should forgive as we have been forgiven (Matthew 6:12; Ephesians 4:31-32). True forgiveness means that we treat the one we’ve forgiven as we would want to be treated. Is there someone you say you have forgiven, but who still needs your kindness?

8 Therefore, although in Christ I could be bold and order you to do what you ought to do.NIV The word therefore carries on the thought from verse 7—the love Philemon had shown to the other believers ought to be extended to include Onesimus. Such a request would be bold indeed; in the Roman Empire, a master had the right to kill a disobedient slave. In any other situation, Onesimus’s action of running away would have signed his death warrant. But Onesimus had met Paul, and Paul knew Philemon, so Paul mediated because of their common brotherhood in Christ.

Paul first described his right to make this appeal to Philemon. Paul was Philemon’s friend and spiritual father (v. 19), but Paul was also an elder and an apostle with authority in Christ. Paul was subtly reminding Philemon of his authority. Paul could have used his authority with Philemon and ordered him to deal kindly with his runaway slave. But Paul based his request not on his own authority, but on his friendship with Philemon and Philemon’s commitment to Christ. Paul wanted Philemon’s heartfelt, not grudging, obedience. Paul would explain to Philemon what he ought to do but would not enforce it, hoping, instead, that Philemon would respond by his own choice (v. 14).

 LIFE APPLICATION – RELATIONSHIPS RECONCILED AND REBUILT

Paul provides a good example of how to deal with conflict between believers. When reconciling a separation or mediating a dispute, trust must be rebuilt between the conflicting parties. Notice the steps that Paul used to help rebuild the trust:
  • Paul identified with the people. He called Philemon “brother” and Onesimus “my son.”
  • Paul requested, not ordered, Philemon.
  • Paul sought Philemon’s voluntary consent, not his submission to rules or authority.
  • Paul appealed to Christ-like love, not to power or authority.
  • Paul agreed to absorb the loss and pay any cost for restoration.
  • Instead of overusing power or position, use Paul’s approach to rebuild a trusting relationship.

9 Yet I would rather appeal to you on the basis of love—and I, Paul, do this as an old man, and now also as a prisoner of Christ Jesus.NRSV Although Paul certainly had the authority to tell Philemon what to do, he preferred not to use his authority in this particular situation. He wanted Philemon to make the final decision. The love to which Paul referred may have been Paul’s love for Philemon, Paul’s love for Onesimus, Philemon’s well-known love for the believers (vv. 4-5, 7), or the virtue of Christ-like love in general. In any case, Paul would make his appeal for Onesimus on the basis of love. Paul appealed to Philemon not so he could exercise his authority; instead, he appealed from his heart because of his concern for this new believer’s future.

Yet Paul’s authority was not to be completely forgotten. Philemon ought to be motivated to follow Paul’s advice, not only because Paul was a friend and spiritual mentor, but for two other reasons: 

  1.  First Paul was an old man. By referring to himself as an old man, Paul was asking for Philemon’s respect as an elder
  2. Paul described himself as a prisoner of Christ Jesus. Paul was a representative of Christ whose commitment to his calling had landed him in prison. Paul could do nothing more than write this note to help Onesimus—he couldn’t go with him back to Colosse. Paul’s authority in his appeal to Philemon came not from position or popularity, but from Christ alone.

10 I appeal to you for my son Onesimus, who became my son while I was in chains.NIV In the Greek text, Onesimus’s name is the last word in this verse. Paul skillfully crafted this letter, with its introduction and sincere compliments to Philemon, here beginning to state his appeal but only giving Onesimus’s name at the last possible moment, and then never getting to the actual appeal until verse 17. Paul approached Philemon with tact and humility.

Philemon probably had been angered that his slave had disappeared (in Roman times, it was like losing a piece of valuable property). , Paul first explained that his appeal was on behalf of someone who had become his son during Paul’s imprisonment—that is, someone Paul had led to Christ from prison. Philemon would be dealing with a fellow believer. “And, by the way,” Paul added, “it’s Onesimus. Remember him?” That Paul called Onesimus a “son” reveals their close relationship. Paul used tou emou teknou (my child) elsewhere only of Timothy and Titus (see 1 Timothy 1:2; Titus 1:4), although he often used the father/child analogy for those he had led to Christ (see, for example, 1 Corinthians 4:14-15; 2 Corinthians 6:13; Galatians 4:19; Philippians 2:22).

What incredible providence had brought this runaway slave to the door of Paul’s prison—Paul, who also had led this slave’s master to the Lord!

11 Formerly he was useless to you, but now he has become useful both to you and to me.NIV Onesimus’s name in Greek means “useful.” The name was a common name for slaves and is found in many ancient inscriptions. A nameless slave might receive this name in the hopes that he would live up to it in serving his master.

Paul used a play on words, saying that Onesimus had formerly been useless (achreston) to Philemon but had become very useful (euchreston) both to Paul and, potentially, to Philemon. Under Philemon’s service, Onesimus had failed to live up to his name. Phrygian slaves were referred to stereotypically as useless and undependable. Paul was confident, however, that this new man with his new life in Christ would live up to his name if Philemon would take him back. In Colossians 4:9, Paul called Onesimus a “faithful and dear brother” (NIV). Onesimus had become known for his faithfulness.

It is interesting to note that Paul did not ask Philemon to free Onesimus. Paul didn’t condemn or condone slavery, but he worked to transform relationships. The gospel begins to change social structures by changing the people within those structures. There were several million slaves in the Roman Empire at this time. Slavery was sanctioned by law and was part of the empire’s social makeup. Because many slaves and slave owners had become Believers, the early church had to deal straightforwardly with the question of master/slave relations. In other letters, Paul simply was stating that slaves should serve well and that masters should be fair (1 Corinthians 7:20-24; Ephesians 6:5-9; Colossians 3:22–4:1). Paul was not interested in trying to change Roman culture; he wanted to build the church as a new community. In the church, relationships should be based on love, not on power or position.

12-13 I am sending him—who is my very heart—back to you.NIV Although Paul would have liked to have kept Onesimus with him, he was sending Onesimus back, requesting that Philemon accept him not only as a forgiven runaway servant, but also as a brother in Christ. This verse suggests that Onesimus himself would deliver this letter to Philemon, so Philemon would need to make his decision as he stood face-to-face with his slave.

Paul described Onesimus as my very heart, once again as in verse 7, referring to the place of deepest emotions. Paul loved Onesimus dearly, as a father loves a child (v. 10). Paul was willing to give away “his very heart,” a part of himself, in order to return Onesimus permanently to Philemon. Onesimus had become part of Paul’s ministry team. This was a sacrifice on Paul’s part, who said, I wanted to keep him with me, so that he might be of service to me in your place during my imprisonment for the gospel.NRSV Onesimus had truly become “useful” (v. 11)—so useful that Paul would have liked to have kept him in Rome so that Onesimus could be of service to him. Paul knew that if Philemon were available to be with Paul, he would have helped him in any way he could; therefore, if Paul had kept Onesimus, Philemon would have been helping Paul vicariously. Paul implied that he trusted Onesimus so much that Onesimus’s service could be considered in place of Philemon’s; therefore, Philemon should be able to trust him as well. Paul, imprisoned for the gospel, longed for his friends; how difficult it was for him to send away this dear “son.” Yet Paul knew it was his duty to do so—Roman law demanded that a deserting slave be returned to his legal owner (although Deuteronomy 23:15-16 states the opposite). Because Onesimus belonged to Philemon, Paul chose to send him back.

 LIFE APPLICATION – WHO CAN YOU SEND?

Paul described Onesimus as much more than just a useful servant. Paul called him his “very heart.” Paul took the risk in faith that Philemon would respond in true Christ-like character and receive Onesimus as a Christian. Paul had such a good relationship with Onesimus that it hurt him deeply to send him back. Do you have anyone who is your very heart and soul that you could send on a mission? Are your children preparing to leave you for the mission field? It may tear your heart to see them go, yet you must send them to do God’s work.
Christianity must be more than a practical, functional experience. At times it is painful, but believers must develop relationships that are warm, genuine, and deep with feeling. Seek to be a heart-to-heart type of friend.

 14 But I preferred to do nothing without your consent, in order that your good deed might be voluntary and not something forced.NRSV Paul would have liked to have kept Onesimus with him (v. 13). However, he decided not to try to talk Philemon into allowing Onesimus to return to Rome to serve Paul; Paul might have felt that this was taking undue advantage of his relationship with Philemon. Only if Philemon were to give his consent for this would it have been voluntary.

Whether Onesimus was sent back to Paul is unknown. Paul had willingly returned Onesimus to Philemon, preferring that Philemon make the final decision in the matter. The good deed probably was not allowing Onesimus to return to Paul, because the Greek structure of the sentence does not imply that Paul was asking this. Rather, Paul simply did not want to do anything about Onesimus without Philemon’s consent. Paul wanted to place no constraint on Philemon other than to deal in Christ-like kindness and love toward his slave. Paul hoped that Philemon would do a “good deed” in pardoning his slave from severe punishment, especially since Onesimus had become a new person in Christ. Philemon had to think of Onesimus not as a piece of property, but as a brother in the fellowship.

15 Perhaps the reason he was separated from you for a little while was that you might have him back for good.NIV Paul considered that all that had happened—Onesimus’s desertion and subsequent conversion to Christ—had been part of God’s providence. God can overrule and bring good out of human sin and folly. Onesimus had caused trouble and heartache, but he had become a new person, and Philemon would soon have him back. The Greek means, “have him for yourself in full possession.” The little while of Onesimus’s absence would be overshadowed by the devotion that would bind him to his master for good. They would be together for eternity, but Paul also wanted Philemon to take Onesimus back into his service permanently now.

Paul may still have hoped that Onesimus would be returned to him. However, he knew that true reconciliation could only occur if (1) Onesimus himself went back to Philemon willing to return to service, and (2) if Philemon willingly accepted Onesimus back.

LIFE APPLICATION – PROVIDENCE

Paul acknowledged that God was at work behind the scenes in this separation of Onesimus and Philemon. God carried out his hidden purpose even in the apparent turmoil of human events.
Although Philemon lost Onesimus, it was only for a time. Philemon eventually regained his slave, but even more, he gained a new brother in Christ.
When we face painful separations or difficult times in relationships with loved ones, we must trust in God’s loving care and in his wisdom and power over all events. God may be using the difficulty to bring people to himself, to develop character, and to help us grow. Can you trust God enough to leave the situation in his hands?

16 No longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear brother. He is very dear to me but even dearer to you, both as a man and as a brother in the Lord.NIV For Philemon to accept Onesimus back, he would have to do so with the understanding that Onesimus had a new status—he was a person (that is, not merely a possession), and he was also a brother in the Lord.

The phrase no longer as a slave has caused much debate. Was this Paul’s way of asking Philemon to free Onesimus? Or was it his way of stating that there should be a new relationship of brother to brother even though they still would be master and slave? According to 1 Corinthians 7:21, Paul encouraged slaves to gain freedom if they could. , it would be consistent for Paul to ask for Onesimus’s freedom in this case. Paul’s asking for Onesimus to be part of his team would be equal to freeing him permanently. But since Paul didn’t ask for the freedom directly, we can’t be sure what he meant. If Onesimus was supposed to return to Philemon as his slave, Philemon would be expected to treat his slave in accordance with their relationship in Christ. Paul had given guidelines for slaves and masters in other letters (1 Corinthians 7:20-24; Ephesians 6:5-9; Colossians 3:22–4:1). Onesimus’s new status as a believer did not negate his responsibilities to Philemon.

Paul knew how difficult it might be for Philemon to deal with Onesimus as a dear brother after the trouble he had caused. Paul made it clear that he not only trusted Onesimus (v. 13) but that he considered Onesimus a brother in Christ. With these words, Paul deftly placed himself, Philemon, and Onesimus all at the same level. While this prisoner, landowner, and slave had very different social positions, they were equals in Christ.

While Onesimus had become very dear to Paul, he was even dearer to Philemon because Onesimus’s former relationship with Philemon had laid the groundwork for a lasting relationship between them.

 LIFE APPLICATION- STATUS UN-CONSCIOUS

What a difference Onesimus’s status as a Christian made in his relationship to Philemon. He was no longer merely a slave, he was also a brother. That meant that both Onesimus and Philemon were members of God’s family—equals in Christ. A Christian’s status as a member of God’s family transcends all other distinctions among believers. Do you look down on any fellow believers? Remember, they are your equals before Christ (Galatians 3:28). How you treat your brothers and sisters in Christ’s family reflects your true commitment to Christ.

The point is well made: when Christ changes a life, that life is changed eternally. Earthly relationships are changed forever. The changed person becomes a dear brother. It does not matter what the relationship has been…

  •  a master-slave relationship
  • a friend-enemy relationship
  • a victim-criminal relationship
  • a love-hate relationship
  • a marriage-divorce relationship
  • an abused-hurtful relationship

 If the person has been truthfully changed by Christ, then he is to be received as a dear brother. Why? Because God has put His hand upon the person and changed him forever.

Next time we’ll look at verses 17-25 which will finish the book of Philemon. 

To hear the messages from Philemon in our series Released, go to  http://ridgefellowship.org/index.php?option=com_sermonspeaker&Itemid=75  

Until next time, Darrell

Sources:
— Bible Exposition Commentary (BE Series) – New Testament
— Life Application Bible Commentary
—New International Version of the Bile
—New Revised Standard Version of the Bible
—Preacher’s Outline and Sermon Bible – Commentary
 
Posted in Released (Philemon) | Leave a comment