What is Fasting?

As a church we will observe a time of fasting to prepare ourselves for Easter.  Here is a general overview of fasting:

What is fasting?  Abstaining from something, usually food, for spiritual purposes

 What does the Bible say?

  • Biblical examples:  Moses (Exodus 34:28; Deut. 9:9,18), David (2 Samuel 12:16), Elijah (1 Kings 19:8), Nehemiah (Nehemiah 1:4); Esther (Esther 4:16), Daniel (Daniel 1:12), Anna (Luke 2:37), Paul (Acts 14:23), Jesus (Matthew 4:1-2), the early church (13:2).
  • Jesus placed fasting on the same level as financial giving and prayer (Matthew 6:1-18).
  • Jesus said that there is a time for fasting (Matthew 9:15).
  • Paul says we should give ourselves at times to prayer and fasting (1 Corinthians 7:5).

 What is the purpose of fasting?

  • The primary purpose of fasting is to focus on God and to center our attention on Him.  In doing so, we glorify God (Zechariah 7:5).
  • Outer fasting is to lead to inner prayer, worship, and devotion.  We “fast on food so we can feast on God.”
  • Fasting is not for personal glory or any other selfish motives (Matthew 6:16-18).
  • Secondary purposes of fasting:  fasting can reveal non-essential things that control us and take precedence in our lives (1 Corinthians 6:12); fasting can increase the effectiveness of prayer (2 Samuel 12:16); fasting can bring guidance from God in decisions (Acts 14:23);  fasting can bring revelations (Acts 13:2); fasting can help our physical wellbeing (Daniel 1:12); fasting can aid in concentration; fasting can help bring deliverance for those who are in bondage.   But these benefits come only when fasting is our attempt to diligently seek God.

What are the different types of fasting?

  1. Absolute fast:  no food or water for a period of time (Exodus 34:28; Esther 4:16)
  2. Normal fast:  only water, but no food or other drink (Nehemiah 1:4)
  3. Partial fast:  usually only water, juices, and sometimes fruit (Daniel 1:12)
  4. Lent fast:  giving up something specific for the duration of Lent (Ash Wednesday – Easter Sunday)
  5. Other things to fast from:  people, media, telephone, certain activities/habits, etc.

We will fast in one of the ways listed above, once each week until Easter on April 8th.   Most of our church will join in a fast on Good Friday, April 6th.

If you would like to join us you can comment below or write fast on your Connection Card on Sunday.  I am praying for you.  God is going to do great things.

Darrell

For more about The Ridge Fellowship, go to  www.ridgefellowship.com

Source: Developed from Nelson Searcy Coaching http://www.churchleaderinsights.com
Posted in Eternal Impact | 1 Comment

Reasons Not to Live Together Before Marriage

Various studies have shown something called “The Cohabitation Effect.” This includes:

  • More negative communication in marriage
  • Lower levels of marital satisfaction
  • Higher marital instability
  • Lower levels of male commitment to spouse
  • Greater likelihood of divorce

Cohabitation – the studies

There have actually been numerous studies that have examined whether living together before marriage is a good idea. The data shows that people who have multiple cohabiting relationships before marriage are more likely to experience more negative communication in marriage,1 lower levels of marital satisfaction,2 the erosion over time of the perceived value of marriage,3 higher perceived marital instability,4 lower levels of male commitment to spouse,5 and greater likelihood of divorce6 than people who do not cohabit before marriage. Although some of these effects might be due to the characteristics of people who cohabit (e.g., they tend to move from one relationship to another), recent studies suggest that selection is not involved,7 but that the cohabitation experience itself contributes to problems in marriage.

The reason why cohabitation may setup couples for failure in marriage is because cohabitation is just a test. Since all couples suffer from some incompatibility, when the other partner “fails” the test, the person moves on to the next partner. A succession of cohabitation failures results in an inability to maintain commitment – the most important part of a marriage relationship. Recent research shows that most couples who cohabit do not do so as a trial marriage, but just slide into it without any particular intent.8

Abuse and Murder

A nation-wide study of over 400,000 homicides committed between 1976 and 1994 calculated the rate of murders of women by her romantic partner.9 It was found that the incidence of was nine times higher in women who cohabited with men than those who were married.

There are a number of factors that predict success or failure in marriage. When considering a potential marriage partner, these factors greatly impact the average success rate for marriage (although there will obviously be exceptions to the trends). Some of these factors predict a more than twice the likelihood of divorce.

Divorce

According to a new research study, living together before marriage increases the chance of divorce. Cohabitation is a positive factor for divorce, which sounds good, but actually means that couples who live together are more likely to split up after marriage.

This information is based upon a 5-year study by Scott Stanley, a psychologist at the University of Denver. Stanley has been interested in the subject of cohabitation for the past 15 years, after he read a 1995 report on the subject.

In the control group who did not live together, only 10 percent had brought up divorce. This means that twice as many people who cohabitated had wanted a divorce enough to tell their partner. Dr. Stanley concludes that many people, who lived together, are less dedicated to making the marriage succeed than those who never had the same premarital address.

These studies are a great reminder that God’s way is the best way.   It’s better to marry, as the God’s word says, than to live together.

Darrell

For more on the series, Marriage Dilemma, go to www.ridgefellowship.com

  1. Cohan, C.L. and S. Kleinbaum. 2004. Toward a Greater Understanding of the Cohabitation Effect: Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Communication. Journal of Marriage and Family 64: 180-192.
    Kline, G. H., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Olmos-Gallo, P. A., St. Peters, M., Whitton, S. W., & Prado, L. M. 2004. Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology 18: 311-318.
    Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., S Markman, H. J. 2004. Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 25: 490-519.
    Thomson, E. and U. Colella. 1992. Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 259-267.
  2. Nock, S.L. 1995. A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships.  Journal of Family Issues 16: 53-76.
    Stafford, L., Kline, S.L, & Rankin, C.T. 2004. Married Individuals, Cohabiters, and Cohabiters Who Marry: A Longitudinal Study of Relational and Individual Well-Being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21: 231-248.
    Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., S Markman, H. J. 2004. Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 25: 490-519.
  3. Axinn, W. G. and J. S. Barber. 1997. Living Arrangements and Family Formation Attitudes in Early Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family 59:595-611.
    Axinn, W., and A. Thornton. 1992. The Relationship between Cohabitation and Divorce: Selectivity or Causal Influence? Demography 29: 357-374.
  4. Kamp Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., and Amato, P. R. 2003. The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: Changes across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 539-549.
    Stafford, L., Kline, S.L, & Rankin, C.T. 2004. Married Individuals, Cohabiters, and Cohabiters Who Marry: A Longitudinal Study of Relational and Individual Well-Being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21: 231-248.
    Thomson, E. and U. Colella. 1992. Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 259-267.
  5. Rhoades, G. K., Petrella, J. N., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. 2006. Premarital cohabitation, husbands’ commitment, and wives’ satisfaction with the division of household contributions. Marriage and Family Review 40: 5–22.
  6. DeMaris, A., Rao, K. V. 1992. Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Stability in the United States: A Reassessment. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 178-190.
    Kamp Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., & Amato, P. R. 2003. The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: Changes across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 539-549.
    Phillips, J. A. and M. M. Sweeney. 2005. Premarital Cohabitation and the Risk of Marital Disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American Women. Journal of Marriage and Family 67:296-314.
    J. Teachman.  2003.  Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution Among Women. Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 444-455.
    Stanley, S. M., Amato, P. R., Johnson, C. A., & Markman, H. J. 2006. Premarital education, marital quality, and marital stability: Findings from a large, random, household survey. Journal of Family Psychology 20: 117-126.
    Paik, A. 2011. Adolescent Sexuality and the Risk of Marital Dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 472 DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00819.x.
  7. Cohan, C.L. and S. Kleinbaum. 2004. Toward a Greater Understanding of the Cohabitation Effect: Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Communication. Journal of Marriage and Family 64: 180-192.
    Kamp Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., and Amato, P. R. 2003. The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: Changes across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 539-549.
    Kline, G. H., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Olmos-Gallo, P. A., St Peters, M., Whitton, S. W., S Prado, L. 2004. Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology 18: 311-318.
    Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., S Markman, H. J. 2004. Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 25: 490-519.
    Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J. 2000. Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal of Family Psychology 20: 553-500.
  8. Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., S Markman, H. J. 2009. Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues 30: 233-258.
    Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K, & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding vs. Deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations 55: 499-509.
  9. Todd K. Shackelford. 2001. Cohabitation, Marriage, and Murder: Woman-Killing by Male Romantic Partners Aggr. Behav. 27:284–291.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Marriage Retreat

Our Marriage Retreat is designed to enrich, renew and lead couples to discover a vibrant & healthy marriage.

The Retreat will cover the following:

  • Top Ten Relational Needs – How to know each other more intimately in order to love each other well.
  • Honest and Loving Communication – How to speak truth in a loving manner
  • Caring Responses – How to respond when someone is “upset”
  • Healing Hurt through Confession and Forgiveness – Experiencing God’s plan for resolving hurt, anger and guilt
  • “Leaving Father and Mother” – How the families we came from shape us and how we can respond today
  • Ongoing Marriage Enrichment – How to continue to grow and change after the workshop

 When:  Friday March 2, 7:00 PM through Saturday March 3rd 4:00 PM

 About Our Presenters

Ben and Tonya Terry have been married over 30 years now, raised 3 children of their own; Amanda, Ryan & Shayne and in 2009 adopted two more children Jessica and Taylor.

Ben & Tonja have had the privilege of being trained & certified as Relationship Coaches by one of the world’s finest marriage champions, Dr. David Ferguson. In addition to being the founder and executive director of Intimate Life Ministries, Dr. Ferguson is the founder of The Center for Relational Care and the Center for Relational Leadership, all headquartered in Austin, Texas

Ben is also a certified Marriage Mentor & Program facilitator of Life Innovations’ Prepare-Enrich Marriage Program, as well as a certified facilitator of New Hope Resources’ Great Start Marriage Program.

For more information see their website:  http://www.greatmarriage.co/#/about-us

  

Where:  Highland Lakes Camp and Conference Center

A serene, inspirational setting, away from the hustle and bustle of everyday life.

The natural beauty of our 240-acres lining the shores of Lake Travis helps create an atmosphere that encourages reflection and relaxation, renewal and refreshment.  

Lodging: Motel Rooms

*Note: Highland Lakes Camp and Conference Center is a rustic, but comfortable and affordable get away as opposed to a luxurious resort.

 

 

 

Food: breakfast & lunch are included in the retreat cost 

 For more about HLCC go to their web site:  http://www.highlandlakescamp.org/459948.ihtml

 Directions to Highland Lakes Camp and Conference Center

 Click HERE to be directed to a map and directions from MapQuest. Or follow the suggested directions listed below.

 Go West R.R. 620 to Highway 71 West.
Turn right. Continue through Bee Cave approximately 12 miles. 

 Highway 71 T-intersects with F.M. 2322 at a full stop light.  (Landmarks at this intersection include a Chevron station and Security State Bank).  Turn here and head North.  Continue 5 miles to Pace Bend Park guard booth.  Tell them you are going to Highland Lakes and continue straight on the main road.  Highland Lakes’ entrance will be 3.5 miles into the park on the left.

 

Schedule:

Friday Evening:

Session 1:  7:00 pm – 8:00 pm     Marital Intimacy: How Are We Doing?

Session 2:  8:00 pm – 9:00 pm     What Do We Need From Each Other?

Saturday Morning:

Breakfast 8:00 am – 8:45 am

Session 3:  9:00 am – 10:00 am    What Is Filling My Emotional Cup?

Session 4:  10:00 am – 11:00 am  Healing Our Hurts

Session 5:  11:00 am – 12:00 pm  Studying Your Family Tree

Lunch 12:00 pm – 12:45 pm

Session 6:  1:00 pm – 2:00 pm      Caring About the Losses of Life

Session 7:  2:00 pm – 3:00 pm      The Games We Play

Session 8:  3:00 pm – 4:00 pm      Becoming Friends & Lovers

 

The  Marriage Retreat  provides practical, Christ-centered principles for truly “knowing” and loving your spouse, allowing them to better “know” you and how to love you, with hands-on exercises and examples of how to become caringly involved in each other’s lives.

Cost:  $149/per couple.    

Space is limited, to secure your spot a $49 deposit is due by Februay 17th. 

There are several options for payment:

  1. On Sunday, Cash, Credit Card or Check -Make checks payable to The Ridge – put “Marriage Retreat”  on memo line or by cash or credit card using an offering envelope. 
  2. Or mail your check payable to The Ridge – put “Marriage Retreat” on memo line to 8754 RR 2243, Leander TX, 78641 by February 17th.

 3. Pay online – put “marriage retreat”  where it says, ” Add Special Instructions to Seller

               Here is a link to our online giving:   www.RidgeFellowship.com/onlinegiving

 

For any other questions, just comment at the bottom of this post and I will get back to you.

Or go to our website www.RidgeFellowship.com

Thanks for investing in your marriage!

Darrell

PS.  To maximize your experience and continue to invest in your marriage be sure to take the Growth Group offered this semester called Intimate Encounters

Click here for more information about meeting times and materials: http://www.ridgefellowship.com/#/growth-groups/interest-groups

Click here to sign up: http://www.ridgefellowship.com/form.php?pageID=48

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Mark 16

The resurrection of Jesus from the dead is the central fact of Christian history. Jesus’ resurrection is unique. Other religions have strong ethical systems, concepts about paradise and afterlife, and various Holy Scriptures. Only Christianity has a God who became human, literally died for his people, and was raised again in power and glory to rule his church forever.

Christians can look very different from one another, and they can hold widely varying beliefs about politics, lifestyle, and even theology. But one central belief unites and inspires all true Christians—Jesus Christ rose from the dead!

Jesus Rises from the Dead / 16:1-8

16:1 Mary Magdalene and the other Mary had been at Jesus’ cross and had followed Joseph so that they would know where he had been buried (15:47). Salome had also been at the cross; she was probably the mother of the disciples James and John. The women went home and kept the Sabbath as the law required, from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. So they purchased burial spices before returning to the tomb early Sunday morning. Anointing a body was a sign of love, devotion, and respect. Bringing spices to the tomb would be like bringing flowers to a grave today. Since they did not embalm bodies in Israel, they would use perfumes as a normal practice. The women undoubtedly knew that Joseph and Nicodemus had already wrapped the body in linen and spices. They probably were going to do a simple external application of the fragrant spices. Since Jesus’ body was buried so rapidly after he was crucified, they had been unable to perform the anointing before Jesus’ burial.

16:2 Sabbath had ended at sundown on Saturday, so very early on Sunday morning, the women left their homes, arriving at the tomb just at sunrise. They wasted no time. This further illustrates their misunderstanding of Jesus. He had told them that he would rise from the dead, yet they expected nothing.

16:3 Two of these women had seen where the body had been placed and knew that a huge stone had been rolled across the entrance to the tomb (15:46). Apparently, they were unaware that the tomb had been sealed and a guard set outside it (Matthew 27:62-66). So as they approached the tomb, they remembered that the stone would be a problem. They wondered aloud who might be able to roll the stone away so that they could get in.

16:4 The women needn’t have worried about the stone. Jesus had said he would rise again after three days. In the Jewish reckoning of time, a day included any part of a day; so, Friday was the first day, Saturday was the second day, and Sunday was the third day. When the women arrived at daybreak, Jesus had already risen.

When they arrived at the tomb, they saw that the large stone had already been rolled aside. Matthew records that there had been an earthquake and an angel of the Lord had descended from heaven, had rolled back the stone, and had sat on it.

16:5-6 The women entered the tomb. Once inside they were startled to see a young man clothed in a white robe. We learn from Matthew and John that this was an angel. When angels appeared to people, they looked like humans.

The angel spoke reassuringly to the women. They were looking for Jesus the Nazarene, the human being who had been crucified. But Jesus was not there; he had been raised from the dead.

The angel invited the women to look into the inner burial chamber and see where they (Joseph and Nicodemus, 15:46) laid his body. John records that the linen cloths that had been wrapped around Jesus’ body were left as if Jesus had passed right through them. The handkerchief was still rolled up in the shape of a head, and it was at about the right distance from the wrappings that had enveloped Jesus’ body (John 20:6-7).

16:7 The women who had come to anoint a dead body were given another task, that of proclaiming the Resurrection to the frightened disciples. The disciples had deserted Jesus in the hour of trial, but the angel’s words held hope of renewal and forgiveness. The disciples were invited to meet Jesus in Galilee—there was work to do. The angel made special mention of Peter to show that, in spite of Peter’s denials, Jesus had not deserted him.

The angel told the disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee just as he told you before he died. This was exactly what Jesus had told them during the Last Supper, that he would go ahead of them into Galilee after his resurrection (14:28). But the disciples, filled with fear, remained behind locked doors in Jerusalem (John 20:19). Jesus met them first in Jerusalem (Luke 24:36) and later in Galilee (John 21).

16:8 The women fled from the tomb, realizing that they had seen the results of an awesome miracle in the empty tomb and had been in the presence of an angel. They either went straight to the disciples with the news, saying nothing to anyone along the way, or for a time they said nothing out of fear, perhaps expecting the response of disbelief that they eventually did receive from the disciples when they told the story (Luke 24:11).

Jesus Appears to Mary Magdalene / 16:9-11

While the material included in 16:1-8 is universally regarded as being original to Mark’s manuscript, the section of 16:9-20 is not considered to have been original. Most scholars believe that verses 9-20 were added sometime in the second century or later; whoever added these verses borrowed heavily from the resurrection accounts in the other Gospels. There are four other different additions to the ending of Mark as found in a few other ancient manuscripts. But the earliest and best Greek manuscripts do not contain these verses, and testimony of the early church fathers indicates that these verses were not part of the original text of Mark’s Gospel. Most modern translations note that these verses are absent from our earliest manuscripts but include them anyway.

16:9-11 After the women had told the disciples about the Resurrection, and Peter and another disciple (presumably John) had gone to see for themselves (John 20:3-9), Mary Magdalene apparently had returned to the tomb and was weeping (John 20:11).

Although Mary Magdalene has been mentioned earlier in this Gospel as one of the women at the cross and at the tomb (15:40, 47; 16:1), Mark reminded his readers of the reason for her devotion to Jesus: He had cast out seven demons from her (see also Luke 8:2). This devoted woman was the first person who saw the resurrected Christ.

Jesus told Mary to return and tell the disciples. The disciples did not believe the women who came to them; Peter and John saw the empty tomb and still did not understand what had happened. They continued their grieving and weeping. Mary returned to the disciples with the news that she had actually seen and talked to the risen Jesus, but they didn’t believe her.

Jesus Appears to Two Believers Traveling on the Road / 16:12-13

Luke’s description of Jesus’ encounter with the two disciples on the road to Emmaus should be read when studying this brief paragraph—Luke 24:13-35.

16:12-13 At another point, Jesus appeared to two of the disciples who had disbelieved Mary’s report of seeing the resurrected Jesus. They were walking from Jerusalem to the small town of Emmaus (west of Jerusalem). These disciples knew that the tomb was empty but didn’t understand that Jesus had risen. To compound the problem, they were walking in the wrong direction—away from the fellowship of believers in Jerusalem. They didn’t recognize Jesus when he appeared beside them because he had changed his appearance.

After talking with these two disciples along the road and reprimanding them about their lack of knowledge of the Scriptures that described all that happened, Jesus revealed himself and then vanished (Luke 24:31). When they realized who he was, they immediately returned to Jerusalem and reported that they too had seen Jesus. But still, no one believed them.

Jesus Appears to the Disciples / 16:14

The disciples’ reluctance to believe was resolved by Jesus’ appearance to them all at one time. The common theme in Mark’s list of appearances was the disciples’ reluctance to believe.

16:14 Jesus finally appeared to the eleven disciples together (Judas Iscariot, the betrayer, had killed himself). Jesus rebuked them for their unbelief. Jesus had foretold his own resurrection. Every time he had told them he would die, he had also told them that he would rise again. The Old Testament prophesied all that had happened to Jesus and also spoke of his resurrection. The disciples had no excuse for the stubborn refusal to believe.

Jesus Gives the Great Commission / 16:15-18

This paragraph represents a change of scene. This was another post-Resurrection appearance, the last to the remaining eleven disciples and other followers. This paragraph outlines Jesus’ final charge to his followers (see also Matthew 28:16-20). The Gospel of Mark is a record of the gospel (or Good News) from its beginning (1:1). As the book closes, the gospel does not end, but continues in the lives of Jesus’ followers. Jesus’ command is to go everywhere and preach the Good News.

16:15 This is the Great Commission. The disciples had been trained well, and they had seen the risen Lord. God had given Jesus authority over heaven and earth. On the basis of that authority, Jesus told his disciples to make more disciples as they preached, baptized, and taught. With this same authority, Jesus still commands us to tell everyone everywhere the Good News.

16:16 The disciples were commanded to baptize people because baptism unites a believer with Jesus Christ in his or her death to sin and resurrection to new life. It is not the water of baptism that saves, but God’s grace accepted through faith in Christ. Because of Jesus’ response to the criminal on the cross who died with him, we know it is possible to be saved without being baptized (Luke 23:43). Jesus did not say that those who were not baptized would be condemned, but that anyone who refuses to believe will be condemned. Baptism symbolizes submission to Christ, a willingness to live God’s way, and identification with God’s covenant people.

16:17-18 As the disciples fulfilled their commission, and indeed as others believed and went on to spread the gospel, miraculous signs would accompany them. As with Jesus’ miracles, these signs would authenticate the source of their power and draw people to belief. At times, God would miraculously intervene on behalf of his followers. While some people have misinterpreted the notion of “picking up snakes” as thinking that one’s faith is demonstrated by handling rattlesnakes, the writer seems to have in mind incidents like the one described in Acts 28:1-6, where Paul was bitten by a poisonous snake without being harmed. The same could happen for someone who accidentally drank deadly poison while on mission for Jesus. This does not mean, however, that we should test God by putting ourselves in dangerous situations.

Jesus Ascends into Heaven / 16:19-20

16:19 These final verses end where the book of Acts begins. Luke wrote in Acts that Jesus appeared to various people over a period of forty days before he ascended (Acts 1:9). As the disciples stood and watched, Jesus was taken up into heaven. Jesus’ physical presence left the disciples, but the Holy Spirit soon came to comfort them and empower them to spread the gospel (Acts 2:1-4). Jesus’ work of salvation was completed, and he sat down in the place of honor at God’s right hand where he has authority over heaven and earth (see also Romans 8:34; Hebrews 1:3; 8:1).

16:20 While Jesus’ work on earth was completed, the disciples’ work was just beginning. This verse compacts the book of Acts. These doubting, stubborn disciples turned into powerful preachers who went everywhere and preached. God worked with them—giving them peace, strength through persecutions, and confirmation of their message with miraculous signs (16:17-18; Hebrews 2:4).

Mark’s Gospel emphasizes Christ’s power, as well as his servanthood. Jesus’ life and teaching turned the world upside down. The world sees power as a way to gain control over others. But Jesus, with all authority and power in heaven and earth, chose to serve others. He held children in his arms, healed the sick, acted patiently with his hardheaded disciples, and died for the sins of the world. Following Jesus means receiving this same power to serve. As believers, we are called to be servants of Christ. As Christ served, so we are to serve.

 Thanks for reading through the gospel of Mark.  I hope you have come to KNOW Christ better during the past 16 days.  To continue to GROW like him:  take time to read from God’s word each day, serve and worship with others, reach out to those who do not know Him and be sure to give him your life and everything in it.

 Darrell

For more about The Ridge Fellowship go to www.RidgeFellowship.com

Sources:
Life Application Concise New Testament Commentary
Life Application Bible Notes
New American Commentary
Preacher’s Outline and Sermon Bible – Commentary
Preaching the Word Commentary
 
 
Posted in Marked (Gospel of Mark) | Leave a comment