Is There a God?

Explore GodThis Sunday, we begin our series Explore God!  Each campus will explore,“Is there a God?”  Leander on  9/8/13 , Jarrell & Taylor 9/15/13.  Hope you can join us!  To get us thinking about the topic below is an article from www.ExploreGod.com

It’s hard to prove or disprove, with 100% certainty, the existence of God. So, how can we even know if there is a God?

Long before Galileo turned his telescope toward the stars, men and women had already begun to question their origin and God’s existence. Answers to these questions have been as diverse as the people who asked them.

Many have attributed their lives to some sort of supreme being or God. But increasingly as society progresses, especially the last 200 years this theistic view is being challenged and rejected on scientific grounds.

Francis Crick, a Nobel Prize-winning molecular biologist, entered the field of science with the intention of proving that there is no God.1 And with his landmark discovery of the DNA molecule in 1953, he believed he’d found evidence for his premise. If everything can be explained by science, there is no need to ascribe anything to God.

Carl Sagan punctuated this thought process. “As science advances, there seems to be less and less for God to do. . . . Whatever it is we cannot explain lately is attributed to God. . . . And then, after a while, we explain it, and so that’s no longer God’s realm.”2

Countering this view is C. S. Lewis, the philosopher, prolific author, and atheist-turned-theist. Lewis suggested that God is the author of life. For much of his own life, Lewis was “very angry with God for not existing,” and he delved into the occult and atheism.3 Yet after nearly twenty years of being antagonistic toward theism, his mind and heart began to change. Finally, he “gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed.”4

Opposing Realities

How can these men, all highly respected and accomplished in their fields of study, reach such different conclusions about something so fundamental?

The only thing we can do is point to evidence for or against a particular view.

Yet there are many things we all—atheist or theist—have in common that could potentially point to the presence of something greater than ourselves.

Morality

Most people operate from a set of strongly held moral principles. Those who dispute the existence of God adhere to this moral code without an objective basis for why some things are “right” and others are “wrong.” But the simple claim that there are right or wrong behaviors unavoidably implies that there is some sort of higher standard defining what is good or bad.

For example, most people would say it is wrong to steal a woman’s purse. Regardless of the circumstances surrounding a thief’s action, there is a basic moral standard in operation. Something in us says, “Taking what isn’t ours is wrong.”

Where do we get this moral standard?

Beauty

If you’ve ever strongly reacted to a song, a piece of art, or a sunset, then perhaps you’ve experienced a clue pointing to the existence of a supernatural being.

Our reaction to beauty—though it is in part a chemical, physiological event—is more than just our brain’s computation of data.  A mixture of colors on a canvas, the ascending notes and crescendo in a musical score, the view from atop a high mountain . . . all these awaken something deep within us. We can find ourselves humbled by the vastness of the cosmos or find peace in the innocence of a sleeping child.

The way we experience beauty—whether in nature, art, or another person—reveals a seemingly inescapable sense that there is something greater, something more than our own existence.

Desire

Most people would agree that for each desire we feel, there exists something in the world that satisfies it—as well as a reason for us to feel it in the first place. We experience hunger because food exists and we must eat to live; we desire sex because sex exists and we must reproduce; we crave companionship because other people exist and humans are social creatures. For every desire there is a corresponding objective reality. We do not desire that which does not exist.

And yet, we want something more. It is a universal experience that transcends time, geography, and culture. That feeling after an especially rough situation or monotonous week, an inner monologue that sighs, “I hope this isn’t all there is.”

C. S. Lewis summarized it this way: “If I discover within myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.”5

Could it be that we long for purpose and fulfillment because there is ultimate purpose and fulfillment to be found in a supernatural being like God?

Science and Faith

It’s worth more broadly mentioning the battle ensuing between science and religion. As our understanding of science grows stronger, so does the assertion that facts render faith superfluous. Science and religion have been facing off for decades now. But why?

Do science’s claims nullify the beliefs of those who adhere to the notion that God created it?  Not really. Simultaneously, does a person’s belief in the work of God negate the truth of the science behind creation? Not at all.

Science and religion are not mutually exclusive. The truth of one does not simply, holistically rule out the truth of the other.

In the End

It all comes back to the unfortunate fact that we can neither prove nor disprove  with 100% certainty the existence of God. Things like beauty and morals may indicate to us that there is something more.

We are all complex creatures in a complex world, wrestling with the same fundamental questions. In the end, each of us must choose to take this data, sift through it, and make an informed decision. Is there a God, or isn’t there?

What do you think?

www.RidgeFellowship.com

www.Exploregod.com

 Footnotes
  1. Interview with Matt Ridley, author of Francis Crick, Discoverer of the Genetic Code, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3306329/Do-our-genes-reveal-the-hand-of-God.html.
  2. Carl Sagan, The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God (New York: Penguin Group, 2007), 64.
  3. C. S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy, (Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace and Company, 1955), 111.
  4. Ibid., 221. Lewis goes on to call himself “perhaps . . . the most . . . reluctant convert in all England.” See the full text for insight into Lewis’s journey from atheism to belief in God.
  5. C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, (New York: HarperCollins, 1952), 136.
Written by:  Joel Lindsey
Posted in Explore God | Leave a comment

Explore God – Join us this Sunday!

I’m excited to announce that this Sunday we will be joining  over 340 other churches in Central Texas doing a series called Explore God.   You’re invited!

Posted in Explore God | Leave a comment

Guatemala Mission Group 2013 Video

Posted in Global Outreach/Mission Trips | Leave a comment

Samson: Strong Again (Judges 16: 23-31)

Be-StrongIt was tragic that a servant of the Lord, raised in a godly home, was now the humiliated slave of the enemy. But even worse, the Philistines gave glory to their god Dagon for helping them capture their great enemy. Instead of bringing glory to the God of Israel, Samson gave the enemy opportunity to honor their false gods. Dagon was the god of grain, and certainly the Philistines remembered what Samson had done to their fields (15:1-5).

The people at the religious festival called for Samson to be brought to entertain them. They were in high spirits because their enemy was now in their control and Dagon had triumphed over Jehovah. They thought that Samson’s blindness rendered him harmless. They didn’t know that God had forgiven him and restored his strength.

In the KJV, two different words are translated “make sport” in 16:25 (“entertain” and “perform” in the NIV). The first means to celebrate, frolic, joke, and entertain; and the second means to perform, make sport, and laugh. We aren’t told exactly how Samson entertained the huge crowd in Dagon’s temple, but one thing is sure: He gave them every reason to believe he was harmless and under their control. He was even in the hands of a boy who was leading the blind man from place to place. We’ve seen previous indications that Samson was clever and had a sense of humor.  He no doubt he gave the audience just what it wanted.

In previous visits to Gaza, Samson had undoubtedly seen this temple and noted its construction. After all, it housed over 3,000 people, and it would be difficult for him not to notice it. At some point during the day’s entertainment, Samson asked his attendant to lead him over to the pillars; and there he uttered his last prayer. The fact that God answered suggests that all was right between him and his Lord (Ps. 66:18-19).

It’s likely that his parents were dead by now, but his relatives on his father’s side came and recovered the body and buried it. The word “brethren” in Judges 16:31 in the Hebrew carries a broad meaning of “relatives.” As far as we know, Samson was an only child. The phrase “between Zorah and Eshtaol” in verse 31 reminds us of 13:25. Samson is back where he started, only now he’s dead. The light has failed.

*Life Application:  Although God did not completely abandon Samson (Jdg 16:28-30), he allowed Samson’s decision to stand, and the consequences of his decision followed naturally. We may choose to be close to God or to go our own way, but there are consequences resulting from our choice. Samson didn’t choose to be captured, but he chose to be with Delilah, and he could not escape the consequences of his decision.

How do you assess the life and ministry of a man like Samson? I think Alexander Maclaren says it well: “Instead of trying to make a lofty hero out of him, it is far better to recognize frankly the limitations of his character and the imperfections of his religion”

His decline began when he disagreed with his parents about marrying a Philistine girl. Then he disdained his Nazirite vow and defiled himself. He disregarded the warnings of God, disobeyed the Word of God, and was defeated by the enemies of God. He probably thought that he had the privilege of indulging in sin since he wore the badge of a Nazirite and won so many victories for the Lord, but he was wrong.

Whoever has no rule over his own spirit is like a city broken down, without walls” (Prov. 25:28, NKVJ).

He who is slow to anger is better than the mighty, and he who rules his spirit than he who takes a city” (Prov. 16:32, NKJV).

I wonder whether Solomon was thinking about Samson when he wrote those words.

* Life Application: In spite of Samson’s past, God still answered his prayer and destroyed the pagan temple and worshipers. God still loved him. He was willing to hear Samson’s prayer of confession and repentance and use him this final time. One of the effects of sin in our lives is to keep us from feeling like praying. But perfect moral behavior is not a condition for prayer. Don’t let guilt feelings over sin keep you from your only means of restoration. No matter how long you have been away from God, he is ready to hear from you and restore you to a right relationship. Every situation can be salvaged if you are willing to turn again to him. If God could still work in Samson’s situation, he can certainly make something worthwhile out of yours.

We can be strong with God’s help.

Darrell  

www.RidgeFellowship.com

Sources:

Bible Exposition Commentary (BE Series) – Old Testament

Life Application Bible Notes

Posted in Be Strong (Samson) | Tagged , , | Leave a comment