Matthew Chapter 12

Gospel of MatthewHello.  It’s so encouraging to read through God’s word together.  I pray you are inspired and lifted up by the life and words of Jesus in Matthew.  Today we read as Jesus teaches about the Sabbath, about Satan and blasphemy against the Holy Spirt and about Jesus prediction of his resurrection.

matthew-24-35THE DISCIPLES PICK WHEAT ON THE SABBATH / 12:1-8

At this point, Matthew returned to an order of events matching Mark’s Gospel. The sections included in 9:18-11:30 are out of order chronologically, but placed thematically according to Matthew’s focus on Jesus’ teachings. Matthew 12:1-14 contrasts with 11:25-30 by comparing the yoke of the Law and the rest Jesus brings. To the Jews, “rest” meant observing the Sabbath.

12:1-2 At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. And His disciples were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, “Look, Your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath!”NKJV Jesus and his disciples, still in Galilee (most likely outside of Capernaum, 9:1), went out walking through the grainfields. The fields were not fenced off but separated by stones set at intervals (Deuteronomy 19:14). Roads often went right though the fields, so this scene is not unusual. What made it of special mention was that this stroll and the subsequent actions of the disciples occurred on the Sabbath. The disciples were hungry, so they began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. On any other day, this would have been acceptable. They were not stealing grain; God’s law called for this kind of sharing among his people (Deuteronomy 23:25). Reaping grain was forbidden on the Sabbath (Exodus 34:21). The disciples, however, were picking grain because they were hungry, not because they wanted to harvest the grain for a profit. Thus, they were not breaking God’s law. The Pharisees, however, had established thirty-nine categories of actions forbidden on the Sabbath, based on their own interpretations of God’s law and on Jewish customs. According to the religious leaders, the disciples were technically “harvesting,” because they were picking wheat and rubbing it in their hands. The Pharisees were determined to accuse Jesus of wrongdoing. They even followed him around on the Sabbath in order to do so!

12:3-4 He answered, “Haven’t you read what David did when he and his companions were hungry? He entered the house of God, and he and his companions ate the consecrated bread—which was not lawful for them to do, but only for the priests.”NIV Jesus’ answer to the Pharisees (12:3-8) contains four arguments explaining why his disciples’ actions were lawful to do on the Sabbath (12:2): (1) David’s example (12:3-4), (2) the priests’ example (12:5-6), (3) proof from the prophets (12:7), and (4) proof from who he was (12:8).

First, Jesus reminded the Pharisees of an example from the life of David. This story is recorded in 1 Samuel 21:1-6. Each week twelve consecrated loaves of bread, representing the twelve tribes of Israel, were placed on a table in the house of God, here meaning the tabernacle. (This bread was called the bread of the Presence or showbread.) After its use in the temple, it was to be eaten only by priests. On one occasion, when fleeing from Saul, David and his men had been given this consecrated bread to eat by Abiathar, the high priest. The loaves given to David were the old loaves that had just been replaced with fresh ones. Although the priests were the only ones allowed to eat this bread, God did not punish David because his need for food was more important than the priestly regulations. Need alone, however, would not normally supersede the law because only danger of death could override Sabbath regulations. The people involved made the difference: David could break the law because he was David; Jesus could break the law because he was the Messiah, in authority over the law. While the story in 1 Samuel does not relate to the question of the Sabbath, the principle is the same. Jesus was explaining that if the high priest, David, and his followers could break a law, how much more could the Son of David—the Messiah.

The Pharisees knew the Scriptures thoroughly, yet Jesus’ question “Haven’t you read?” reveals their ignorance of the true meaning of the Scriptures. Yes, they had read this story many times, but they had obviously not discerned or applied its meaning. Jesus justified his disciples’ action on the grounds that his authority superseded the requirement of ceremonial law. When Jesus compared himself and his disciples to David and his men, Jesus was saying, in effect, “If you condemn me, you must also condemn David.” Jesus was not condoning disobedience to God’s laws. Instead, he was emphasizing discernment and compassion in enforcing the ceremonial laws, something the self-righteous Pharisees did not comprehend.

12:5 “Or have you not read in the law that on the sabbath the priests in the temple break the sabbath and yet are guiltless?”NRSV Jesus responded to the Pharisees’ accusation with a second answer, using an example from the priests who served in the temple. Jesus again repeated the question “Have you not read in the law?” to show these self-righteous Pharisees that while they had the law memorized, they really didn’t understand it. The Ten Commandments prohibit work on the Sabbath (Exodus 20:8-11). That was the “letter” of the law. But because the purpose of the Sabbath is to rest and to worship God, the priests had to perform sacrifices and conduct worship services—in short, they had to “work.” Their “Sabbath work” was serving and worshiping God, which God allowed. Thus, even though they technically break the sabbath, God holds them guiltless. Jesus always emphasized the intent of the law, the meaning behind the letter. The Pharisees had lost the spirit of the law and were rigidly demanding that the letter (and their interpretation of it) be obeyed.

 LIFE APPLICATION – READING THE BIBLE
A casual reader of the Bible can find evidence for almost any argument there. Just take a verse out of context, just isolate a passage, just make a story into an edict, and you can make the Bible say anything. The Pharisees, for example, were about to use the Bible (Old Testament) to make Jesus an ally of the devil.
The Bible must be read correctly, from the vantage point of faith, with a hunger to find in it the truth of God as revealed in Jesus. To aid your reading, find faithful Christian friends (and a trustworthy church) who can guide your understanding. Read your Bible as if it were a conversation between you and God. Then begin to live what you’re learning.

12:6 “I tell you, something greater than the temple is here.”NRSV The use of the neuter gender (something greater) indicates that Jesus may have been referring to the kingdom. Yet to refer to the supremacy of the kingdom highlights the supremacy of Jesus. Just as the priestly duties in the temple surpass Sabbath regulations about work, so Jesus’ ministry transcends the temple.

The Pharisees were so concerned about religious rituals that they missed the whole purpose of the temple—to bring people to God. And because Jesus Christ is even greater than the temple, how much better can he bring people to God. Our love and worship of God are far more important than the created instruments of worship. If we become more concerned with the means and methods of worship than with the one we worship, we will miss the true purpose for worship—to glorify God.

12:7 “If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.”NIV Third, Jesus used proof from the Old Testament prophets to answer the Pharisees. Jesus repeated to the Pharisees words the Jewish people had heard time and again throughout their history (1 Samuel 15:22-23; Psalm 40:6-8; Isaiah 1:11-17; Jeremiah 7:21-23; Hosea 6:6). He had also used this same example in 9:13 when the Pharisees had criticized the people with whom he was spending time (“tax collectors and sinners”). The Old Testament statement “I desire mercy, not sacrifice” means that rituals and obedience to the law are valuable only if carried out with an attitude of love for God. If a person’s heart is far from God, ritual and law keeping are no more than empty mockery. God did not want the Israelites’ rituals; he wanted their hearts. Jesus challenged the Pharisees to apply the prophets’ words to themselves. The Pharisees’ rigid guidelines had caused them to be unable to see beyond the letter of the law. So in condemning Jesus and his disciples, they had condemned the innocent. The disciples were no more guilty of breaking the law than priests who did their duty on the Sabbath. The disciples were doing “priestly work” by spreading the Good News of the kingdom on the Sabbath.

God’s mercy takes precedence over legal restrictions. If only the Pharisees had known and had understood the words of the prophets, they would have understood the love and compassion behind God’s laws. Their condemnation would then have been only to those who deserved it, not to those who were truly innocent of disobedience.

 LIFE APPLICATION – CHOOSING A CHURCH
Jesus amazed his listeners when he told them that he, the carpenter’s son, was supreme over biblical law—in fact, the only sure authority on biblical law. The point is clear: If Jesus is at the center, all is well; but if anything else becomes the focus of worship (even keeping biblical laws with rigor and diligence), then something is wrong.
When you’re choosing a church, be sure that the church keeps Jesus at the center. When you’re reading the Bible (or hearing it taught), be sure of the same. Lots of other authorities compete for our attention, but no other authority will do.

12:8 “For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.”NIV Jesus’ fourth answer to the Pharisees’ accusation (12:2) focused on who he was. When Jesus said that he (again, calling himself Son of Man) was Lord of the Sabbath, he was claiming to be greater than the law and above the law. To the Pharisees, this was heresy. They did not realize that Jesus, the divine Son of God, had created the Sabbath. The Creator is always greater than the creation; thus, Jesus had the authority to overrule their traditions and regulations. Jesus claimed the authority to correctly interpret the meaning of the Sabbath and all the laws pertaining to it. Who created the Sabbath? God did. Therefore, because Jesus, the Son of Man, is God’s Son, given authority and power by God himself, then he is also Lord of the Sabbath.

JESUS HEALS A MAN’S HAND ON THE SABBATH / 12:9-14

As if to illustrate that the commandment to love takes precedence over the law, Jesus went to the synagogue where he healed a man with a shriveled hand.

12:9-10 Going on from that place, he went into their synagogue, and a man with a shriveled hand was there. Looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”NIV It was the Sabbath (12:1), and according to his regular custom, Jesus went to the synagogue. This may have been any synagogue in Galilee although it was most likely in Capernaum. In the synagogue, there was a man with a shriveled hand. He had been born with this defect or had acquired it by an accident or disease. The hand was useless. Luke adds the detail that it was the man’s right hand (Luke 6:6).

Jesus’ reputation for healing (even on the Sabbath, see Mark 1:21-26) had preceded him, but would he dare heal on the Sabbath with Pharisees watching? (Most likely, the Pharisees had followed him from the grainfield; 12:1-2). God’s law prohibited work on the seventh day of the week (Exodus 31:14-17); thus, the religious leaders allowed no healing to be done on the Sabbath unless a person’s life was in danger. Healing, they argued, was practicing medicine, and they had a law that a person could not practice this profession on the Sabbath.

The Pharisees did not regard the man’s need; instead, they seized the opportunity to accuse Jesus as a Sabbath breaker. As they pointed to the man with the shriveled hand, the Pharisees tried to trick Jesus by asking him if it was lawful (legal) to heal on the Sabbath. Their motive, however, was not to gain information; they were looking for a reason to accuse Jesus. Their Sabbath rules said that people could be helped on the Sabbath only if their lives were in danger. Jesus healed on the Sabbath several times, and none of those healings were in response to emergencies. If Jesus had waited until another day, he would have been submitting to the Pharisees’ authority, showing that their petty rules were equal to God’s law. If he healed the man on the Sabbath, the Pharisees could claim that because Jesus broke their rules, his power was not from God. But Jesus made it clear how ridiculous and petty their rules were. God is a God of people, not rules. The best time to reach out to someone is when he or she needs help.

 LIFE APPLICATION – RULE KEEPING
The Pharisees placed their laws above human need. They were so concerned about Jesus breaking one of their rules that they did not care about the man’s shriveled hand. What is your attitude toward others? If your convictions don’t allow you to help certain people, those convictions may not be in tune with God’s Word. Don’t allow rule keeping to blind you to human need.

12:11-12 He said to them, “Suppose one of you has only one sheep and it falls into a pit on the sabbath; will you not lay hold of it and lift it out? How much more valuable is a human being than a sheep! So it is lawful to do good on the sabbath.”NRSV Instead of answering the Pharisees’ question, Jesus responded with an illustration and a question of his own. A sheep that had fallen into a pit was in danger. If this occurred on the Sabbath, the sheep’s owner was allowed to lay hold of it and lift it out, even though this constituted work. If it is acceptable to do good to a sheep on the Sabbath, doesn’t it also follow that people can do good for other people on the Sabbath? Because people are more valuable than sheep, they are even more worthy of help.

Mark recorded that Jesus asked a rhetorical question: “‘Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?’ But they [the Pharisees] remained silent” (Mark 3:4 niv). The Pharisees knew that giving an answer would have left them without an accusation to pin on Jesus. Their own laws allowed people to do good and to save life on the Sabbath—the farmer who could rescue his only lamb from a pit on the Sabbath knew that. So Jesus made the pronouncement: So it is lawful to do good on the sabbath. Doing good fulfills Sabbath intentions.

12:13 Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and it was restored, as sound as the other.NRSV Jesus refused to play by the Pharisees’ rules. After pronouncing that it was lawful to do good on the Sabbath (12:12), Jesus did exactly that. He told the man to stretch out his hand. In response to Jesus’ command and with all eyes focused on him, the man stretched his hand out in front of him. The moment he did so, it was restored, as sound as the other. “Restored” means that it became like it had been before. As with the leper (8:3) and the paralytic (9:6-7), Jesus gave this man his life back. The man could work again, and he no longer had to face the embarrassment of his deformity.

No particular action of Jesus is recorded; he told the man to move, and with that movement, healing arrived. Jesus did nothing that could be called “work,” but the Pharisees would not be swayed from their purpose. Jesus had embarrassed them. He had overruled their authority (Luke 6:11) and had exposed their evil attitudes in front of the entire crowd in the synagogue, showing that the Pharisees were more loyal to their religious system than to God. That was enough to cause them to get on with their mission of destruction (see 12:14).

 LIFE APPLICATION – CARING FOR PEOPLE
Jesus said that if a lost animal is worth saving, people are worth more. Jesus puts a priority on the care of people. Better to err (against rule keeping) by caring for people than to err by a stringent interpretation of biblical law (while people suffer).
Where are your loyalties? Are you able to use Christian judgment in cases of a conflict between human need and law keeping? Ask your Bible study group to take up some hypothetical situations, and try together to discern how Jesus would respond.

12:14 But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.NIV The Pharisees were outraged. Jesus had openly confronted their authority and had placed himself above them. Their curiosity about Jesus turned to hatred because he had challenged and exposed their proud attitudes and dishonorable motives. In their fury, the only option they saw was to kill Jesus. Ironically, the Pharisees had accused Jesus of breaking their law about healing on the Sabbath, yet they were planning (on the Sabbath) to kill him. Their hatred, combined with their zeal for the law, drove them to plot murder—an act that was clearly against the law.

Mark records that the Pharisees plotted with the Herodians (Mark 3:6). This was an unlikely alliance. The Herodians were a Jewish political party that hoped to restore Herod the Great’s line to the throne. Thus, their support of Rome’s leadership over Palestine brought them into direct conflict with the Jewish religious leaders. The Pharisees and Herodians had little in common—until Jesus posed a threat to them both. Jesus threatened the Pharisees’ authority over the people; Jesus threatened the Herodians’ political ambitions because his talk of a “kingdom” caused them to think that this popular and powerful man was planning to set himself up as a ruler. This would jeopardize their authority derived from Herod’s power. To get rid of Jesus, the Pharisees needed the support of people with some influence with the secular leaders. Thus, the Pharisees and Herodians, normally enemies, joined forces to discuss how to get rid of Jesus.

The way Jesus kept the Sabbath irritated his critics to the point of fury. To us, their reaction seems overstated. We must remember that the religious leaders, by imposing a bewildering system of Sabbath laws, had in fact made themselves lords of the Sabbath and thus lords over the people. By claiming the title of Lord of the Sabbath (12:8), Jesus was stating his own divinity, and this claim was an affront to the position of the religious leaders. His remaking the Sabbath into a day of refreshment, worship, and healing pried open the tight-fisted control the Pharisees held on the people. No wonder Jesus’ approach to the Sabbath led his enemies to plot his death.

 LIFE APPLICATION – HOW TO MAKE FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE
Dale Carnegie’s famous book by this title taught a generation of people how to get one’s way and be friendly at the same time. Carnegie, no doubt, would have counseled Jesus to “take it easy” on the Pharisees. Today we might say, “Lighten up!”
But some conflict must be faced head-on. In Jesus’ time and ours, people become angry when told that sin requires a special savior—in fact, the only savior. Don’t placate people by conceding that any savior will do or that decent people are OK before God on their own. Tell the truth with compassion, even when it generates conflict.

LARGE CROWDS FOLLOW JESUS / 12:15-21

12:15-16 Aware of this, Jesus withdrew from that place.NIV Jesus, aware that the religious leaders were plotting to kill him (12:14), withdrew from that place (presumably Capernaum). Jesus was not afraid of the religious leaders. Up to this point, Jesus had been aggressively confronting the Pharisees’ hypocrisy. At this point in time, however, he decided to withdraw from the synagogue before a major confrontation developed. Jesus did this because it was not time for him to die. He still had many lessons to teach his disciples and the people.

Many followed him, and he healed all their sick, warning them not to tell who he was.NIV Despite his withdrawal, Jesus could not escape the crowds. Many continued to follow him, and Jesus had compassion on those who were sick, and he healed them; however, he also gave them a warning . . . not to tell who he was. Jesus did not want those he healed to tell others about his miracles because he didn’t want people coming to him for the wrong reasons. A popular following of miracle seekers would hinder his teaching ministry and arouse false hopes about an earthly kingdom (see also 8:4; 9:30). But the news of Jesus’ miracles spread, and many came to see for themselves (see Mark 3:7-8).

12:17-21 This was to fulfill what had been spoken through the prophet Isaiah.NRSV In the following verses, Matthew gets to the focus of this chapter—Jesus as the one who fulfilled prophecy. The people expected the Messiah to be a king. This quotation from Isaiah’s prophecy (Isaiah 42:1-4) showed that the Messiah was indeed a king, but it illustrated the kind of king he would be—a quiet, gentle ruler who brings justice to the nations. Like many in Jesus’ day, we may want Christ to rule as a king and bring great and visible victories in our lives. But often his work is quiet, and it happens according to his perfect timing, not ours.

This is the longest Old Testament quotation in Matthew. The words don’t match exactly any existing Old Testament text from the time, indicating that Matthew may have paraphrased the words for emphasis.

Here is my servant whom I have chosen, the one I love, in whom I delight.NIV The word for “servant” (pais) can also mean “son.” The word “chosen” may have also been picked up from Isaiah 43:10 or 44:1 to focus on this “chosen” one as the Messiah. The phrase “the one I love, in whom I delight” echoes words spoken by God at Jesus’ baptism and transfiguration (3:17; 17:5).

I will put my Spirit on him.NIV The coming of the Spirit was a sign of the messianic age. These words also echo Isaiah 61:1, quoted by Jesus in Luke 4:18. After reading the words aloud, Jesus had said, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing” (Luke 4:21 niv).

And he will proclaim justice to the nations.NIV “Proclaim justice” refers to restoring justice and order and bringing judgment on sinners. The Messiah would offer justice to all nations, not just to the Jews (some versions use the word “Gentiles”).

He will not quarrel or cry out; no one will hear his voice in the streets.NIV The Messiah pictured in these words differs dramatically from the person the Jews expected—a military leader calling the nation to battle against the Roman foe. Instead, this man will not quarrel or cry out. These words follow Matthew’s report of Jesus’ withdrawal from conflict with the Pharisees (12:15). The Messiah will not be silent (he will “proclaim” justice, see above), but neither will he publicize himself and seek attention. These words suggest gentleness and humility (see 11:29; see also Isaiah 53:7).

A bruised reed he will not break, and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out, till he leads justice to victory.NIV The “bruised reed” refers to the fragile lives of the “little ones” to whom the Servant ministers. He will not break (or destroy) them. The “smoldering wick” pictures a strip of linen cloth with little oil left in the lamp. The wick smolders, on the verge of going out, but the Servant will not snuff out the little wick. These words suggest a Savior who comes to heal, not to destroy. The phrase “till he leads justice to victory” seems to paraphrase parts of Isaiah 42:4 and 44:3-4 (see also Habakkuk 1:4). Justice will finally triumph when the Servant-Messiah comes. He may be gentle and meek, kindly healing the sick and teaching those who want to understand, but one day he will bring complete justice.

In his name the nations will put their hope.NIV In the nrsv, the word ethne (“the nations”) is translated “Gentiles.” People from all nations, not just Jews, will one day put their hope in the name of Jesus. “God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:9-11 niv). Jesus pointed out his universal mission; he wanted his message to reach all nations. It is a further indication of his messianic role that would culminate in the Great Commission (28:19-20). God would ultimately rescue the oppressed and bring salvation to all who trust him.

 LIFE APPLICATION – THE LITTLE GUYS
Jesus cares a lot about people who don’t have a Ph.D., don’t own golf clubs, and don’t drive a late model car. Jesus cares about the boring people in your town, the sick and the mentally retarded, and the people on welfare. Because he cares about them, they—and not merely the upwardly mobile types—are the truly important people of this world.
Do you ever wonder if you matter? Does your nondescript life make a difference to anyone? Do your modest talents count for anything? If so, you’re exactly the kind of person Jesus wants to know, his favorite kind of friend. Trust him with your life. He deals gently with those who come to him in need.

RELIGIOUS LEADERS ACCUSE JESUS OF BEING UNDER SATAN’S POWER / 12:22-37

Leaving the chronology in these verses, Matthew gives an example of the intensifying conflict between Jesus and the religious leaders. (See the Harmony of the Gospels at the back of this commentary; Mark records this incident early, in Mark 3:22.) The religious leaders had already decided that they wanted to kill him (12:14), so they began looking for any opportunity to accuse him.

12:22 Then one was brought to Him who was demon-possessed, blind and mute; and He healed him, so that the blind and mute man both spoke and saw.NKJV Matthew downplayed this miracle in order to highlight the confrontation that followed. A man who was demon-possessed, blind and mute was brought to Jesus for healing. The Greek wording suggests that the blindness and inability to speak were a direct result of demon possession. Jesus healed the man, casting out the demon and restoring his ability to speak and see.

12:23 All the crowds were amazed and said, “Can this be the Son of David?”NRSV The crowds were amazed when they saw the man healed. This is the only time that the word existanto (also translated “astonished”) is used in Matthew’s Gospel (although it occurs often in Mark and Luke). The word conveys intense wonder and amazement. The Greek construction of their question expects a negative answer although it allows for the possibility of a positive response: “This couldn’t be the Son of David, could it?” The title “Son of David” is another name for the Messiah. The Jews understood that the promised Messiah would be a son (descendant) of King David (see Isaiah 9:6-7; 11:1; Jeremiah 23:5-6). “Could this man be the one?” they wondered. They were puzzled because, despite all his miracles, Jesus just did not seem to be the Messiah they were expecting.

12:24 But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, “It is only by Beelzebub, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons.”NIV Apparently another delegation of Pharisees had come from Jerusalem. The people were “amazed,” but . . . the Pharisees refused to believe that Jesus’ power was from God. They could not deny the reality of Jesus’ miracles and supernatural power, for he had indeed been driving out demons. So in an attempt to undermine Jesus’ authority and popularity among the people, the Pharisees accused him of having power from Satan.

The name “Beelzebub” occurs only in the New Testament (in 10:25 and Luke 11:15) and not in other Jewish literature. In Greek, the term is beelzeboul. The Vulgate and Syriac versions tried to clarify the term by changing it to beelzebub, the god of Ekron (see 2 Kings 1:2-3, 6, 16). The religious authorities may have invented the term by combining two Hebrew words: baʾal (“lord,” Hosea 2:16-17) which stood for the local Canaanite fertility god; and zebul (“exalted house,” 1 Kings 8:13 nrsv) to call Jesus “the lord of heaven.” Everyone would have understood this term as referring to Satan, the prince (or leader) of demons.

12:25-26 He knew what they were thinking and said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand. If Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself; how then will his kingdom stand?”NRSV Jesus knew what the Pharisees were thinking. In the Incarnation, Jesus gave up the complete and unlimited use of his supernatural abilities, but he still had profound insight into human nature (see 9:4). His discernment stopped the religious leaders’ attempts to trick him.

Jesus responded to them in a parable—a simple example from life that would reveal the absurdity of their charge that he was in league with Satan. Following the obvious conclusion of the accusation—that Satan was driving himself out of people—Jesus indicated that if that were true, it would then mean that there was civil war in the kingdom of evil. No king would throw his own soldiers out of his kingdom; neither would Satan throw his soldiers out because his kingdom would then be divided against itself. Such a kingdom would be laid waste. In the same way, people in a city or house, divided about their goals and working against one another, will not be successful. Jesus implied that it would be impossible for Satan to cast out himself (or his demons).

Obviously Satan is still very powerful and active; thus, his end had not come—not in Jesus’ day, nor in ours. So Satan is not opposing himself, nor is he divided. The teachers’ charge that Jesus was driving out demons by Satan’s power was obviously false. But Jesus wasn’t finished.

 LIFE APPLICATION – DRIVING WEDGES
The worst kind of sin involves driving a wedge between Jesus and the people whom he wants to reach. Pharisees sought to do that by accusing Jesus of partnership with the devil. Today we see it happen when learned professors cynically dismiss religion, when talk-show hosts smirk about religious hypocrites, and when pastors take their sermon cues from psychology instead of the Bible.
Give no encouragement to people who try to undermine Jesus. They are in great danger, and spoiled faith rides in their wake.

12:27 “And if I drive out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your people drive them out? So then, they will be your judges.”NIV Jesus was not the first person in that area to exorcise demons. In the first century, exorcism was a thriving business, both in pagan and Jewish societies (Mark 9:38; Acts 19:13-14). Some were effective and some were frauds. Exorcists would employ complex incantations, magical charms, and even visual effects. (Jewish exorcists came only from the Pharisees because the Sadducees denied the existence of spirit beings.) Jesus, however, needed only his authoritative word. His constant success, the ease with which he cast out demons, and the reactions of the demons made Jesus’ exorcisms notable. Jesus was saying, “If it takes Satan’s power to drive out demons, then those of your own group who claim to drive out demons must also be demon-possessed.” The Pharisees who had cast out demons would “judge” these other Pharisees for implying that being able to exorcise demons meant being in league with Satan.

12:28 “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come to you.”NRSV The word “if” means “since.” There is no question that it is by the Spirit of God that Jesus cast out demons. Luke’s version of this account says “finger of God” (Luke 11:20). Both mean the same, focusing on the power of God. That the kingdom of God has come to you shows that Jesus’ exorcisms were specific evidence of the presence of kingdom power.

The kingdom of God came not with a mighty military leader, but with a gentle and compassionate Servant. The real enemy to be conquered was not the Romans but Satan. That Jesus was powerfully casting out demons and plundering Satan’s kingdom revealed that the kingdom of God had begun.

 LIFE APPLICATION – GET REAL
If the kingdom of God has come, take a reality check. If you live your days without much reference to God, with a few passing words of prayer, your mind consumed with earning and buying, your eyes dashing from one advertisement to another, your heart longing for one more nice purchase—then wake up!
There’s a reality you haven’t seen or paid much attention to. It’s the kingdom of God, right here, and it’s very, very important to you. Unless you check in, life will be a dash—and then gone. But people of the kingdom live forever in God’s peace and love. Take time today, right now. Live one day regarding your life as being in God’s kingdom and yourself as his true servant.

12:29 “Or how can one enter a strong man’s house and plunder his property, without first tying up the strong man? Then indeed the house can be plundered.”NRSV This picture reflects a situation in the ancient world where wealthy people’s homes were virtual fortresses, and their servants could form a small army. Jesus called Satan a strong man in this parable. His house is the realm of evil where there is sickness, demon possession, and death (it also refers to a possessed individual in whom Satan’s demons live). Satan’s property are the demons—those beings through whom he carries out his work in the world. The only way his property could be “plundered” would be for someone to first tie up the strong man; the only way for the demons to be cast out is for someone to first overpower Satan. Jesus’ advent into the world did just that (1 John 3:8). Jesus’ actions reveal that Satan can never overcome him.

Although Satan still works in our world, God is in control. Jesus, as God, has “tied up” Satan in one sense; Satan’s ultimate doom is sure, and his power over death was broken at Christ’s resurrection. Jesus and his disciples were able to drive out demons and end their terrible work in people’s lives. As such, every exorcism was a binding of Satan; one day Satan will be bound forever (Revelation 20:10). Jesus was not in league with Satan, as the Pharisees tried to claim; rather, he had overpowered Satan by refusing his temptations and by constantly freeing people held in Satan’s grasp—either through demon possession or through the power of sin.

12:30 “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.”NRSV It is impossible to know about Christ and remain neutral indefinitely. Anyone who is not actively following him has chosen to be against him. Any person who tries to remain neutral in the struggle of good against evil is choosing to be separated from God, who alone is good. “Gathering” and “scattering” are Old Testament pictures of faithful and apostate people, respectively. To refuse to follow Christ is to choose to follow Satan.

 LIFE APPLICATION – THE NEUTRAL ZONE
Separating North Vietnam from South during more than a decade of battle was the demilitarized zone, a kind of no-man’s-land, burned over and barren. Rivers, mountains, and man-made walls have served the same purpose—neutral, open space where both sides watch and neither stakes out a claim. No such space exists in the spiritual battle waged between God and Satan.
Get over to God’s side if you’re wandering in the middle. Stay on God’s side when you’re curious about life on the edge. Take your part in the struggle on the front lines, where witnessing hurts and few Christians are strong enough to support a church. But don’t be fooled about finding a neutral zone claimed by no side at all.

12:31 “Therefore I tell you, people will be forgiven for every sin and blasphemy.”NRSV “Therefore I tell you” (also translated, “Wherefore I say unto you” in kjv, “And so I tell you” in niv, and “Therefore I say to you” in nkjv) is a recurring phrase used by Jesus only prior to a solemn warning or pronouncement. It is like the Old Testament statement, “Thus saith the Lord.” The words are divinely self-authenticating and guarantee the truth and importance of what Jesus would say next. Jesus would no longer reason with his accusers; he was giving them a solemn warning. Jesus had just been accused of being in league with Satan and had soundly refuted those charges. Here he had a few words for these so-called teachers of the law, the Jewish leaders.

First, he made the reassuring promise, people will be forgiven for every sin and blasphemy. Too often people miss this promise and worry about the warning that follows. But the fact is, those who believe in Jesus will be forgiven of all sins (evil acts, wrong actions, good actions not done, evil thoughts, evil motives, etc.) and of all blasphemies (evil words said against God). When there is confession and repentance, no sin is beyond God’s forgiveness.

“But blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.”NRSV There is one sin that cannot be forgiven—blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. “Blasphemy against the Spirit” refers not so much to a single action or word as to an attitude. Those who defiantly deny Jesus’ power and persistently refuse to believe that he is the Messiah are blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Jesus was not talking about rejecting him, but of rejecting the power behind him.

Jesus’ words were addressed directly to the Pharisees. They had blasphemed the Spirit by attributing the power by which Christ did miracles to Satan instead of to the Holy Spirit. This is the unforgivable sin—the deliberate refusal to acknowledge God’s power in Christ. It indicates an irreversible hardness of heart. Deliberate, ongoing rejection of the work of the Holy Spirit is blasphemy because it rejects God himself. The Pharisees’ stubborn refusal to believe demonstrated an impenetrable hardness of heart; thus, forgiveness would not be possible because it never would be sought. The religious leaders accused Jesus of blasphemy (see Luke 5:21; John 10:33-36), but ironically they were the guilty ones because they looked Jesus in the face and accused him of being possessed by Satan.

 LIFE APPLICATION – UNFORGIVABLE?
Jesus said that one sin could not be forgiven. Sometimes believers worry that they have accidentally committed this unforgivable sin. But only those who have turned their back on God and rejected all faith have any need to worry. If you are worried about this sin, realize that your worry is your strongest evidence that you have not made this tragic mistake. Use this prompting from the Spirit to repent and turn to Jesus.

12:32 “Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”NRSV These words may mean that speaking against the person of Jesus can be forgiven because the insult may be based in ignorance of who he is (at that time not even Jesus’ disciples completely understood who he was). But speaking against the Holy Spirit—to deny the power behind Jesus’ ministry—is unforgivable. (Some versions use the word “blasphemy,” meaning extreme slander.) The rejection of a messenger (even of the Son himself) can be forgiven, but not the rejection of God himself through the Holy Spirit. The mighty works done by the Spirit were unmistakable announcements that the kingdom had arrived. Those who dared to attribute these works to Satan were not ignorant; instead, they had made up their minds not to believe.

Jesus said that those who slander the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven—not because their sin is worse than any other, but because they will never ask for forgiveness. The only sin that God is unable to forgive is the unwillingness to accept forgiveness.

Robert H. Mounce

 

Whoever rejects the prompting of the Holy Spirit removes himself or herself from the only force that can lead anyone to repentance and restoration with God. Those who have seen the light and yet prefer the darkness are blaspheming the Holy Spirit. This sin cannot be forgiven in this age or in the age to come because its consequences are eternal.

12:33 “Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit.”NIV Just as a good tree bears good fruit and a diseased (or bad) tree bears inedible fruit, so the fruits of a person’s life will show the quality of his or her character. Fruit is a comprehensive word, referring to teaching, character, and action. (See also 7:16-18.) Our character is revealed by our conduct.

12:34-35 “You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks.”NIV Jesus called the Pharisees a brood of vipers (see also 3:7; 23:33), rebuking them for their hypocritical accusation against him (12:24). Jesus called them evil; their nature and character were completely evil as seen by their words (their “fruit,” 12:33). Because they were evil, how could they possibly say anything good (or wise or truthful)? The words “out of the overflow of the heart” indicate that a person’s words reveal his or her character (“heart” referring to the inner person). The Pharisees could not hide their evil behind their status, robes, and position; their words betrayed their true character.

Restating this same principle, Jesus continued: “The good person brings good things out of a good treasure, and the evil person brings evil things out of an evil treasure.”NRSV The word “treasure” is another metaphor for the “heart”—that is, the inner person. (See also 6:19-21.)

12:36-37 “I tell you, on the day of judgment you will have to give an account for every careless word you utter.”NRSV These verses are found only in Matthew. Jesus explained that words matter—each person will have to give an account for every careless word. The word “careless” refers to words that we might consider insignificant or innocuous. “Careless” means inactive, idle, worthless. This refers not to mindless small talk or carefree jokes, but to broken promises, unkept commitments, and unpaid vows. Such words are better indicators of a person’s true character than his or her carefully planned and prepared statements and speeches. No word is insignificant to God, because every spoken word reveals what is in the heart. Because God knows our hearts, our words are vitally important to him. Words will be a basis for judgment because words reveal who a person truly is: “For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.”NIV

RELIGIOUS LEADERS ASK JESUS FOR A MIRACLE / 12:38-45

12:38 Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to him, “Teacher, we wish to see a sign from you.”NRSV Apparently some scribes joined the Pharisees. They asked Jesus for a sign—that is, some miracle proving that he was the Messiah. But they were not sincerely seeking to know Jesus. Jesus knew they had already seen enough miraculous proof to convince them that he was the Messiah if they would just open their hearts. But they had already decided not to believe in him, and more miracles would not change their minds. The Pharisees (here joined by the scribes) wanted Jesus to authenticate by a sign the special relationship he claimed to have with God. In a separate incident recorded in 16:1-4, the Pharisees and Sadducees would ask Jesus for “a sign from heaven.” Jesus responded to both requests in the same way.

 LIFE APPLICATION  –  STUDY THE EVIDENCE
Many people have said, “If I could just see a real miracle, then I could really believe in God.” But Jesus’ response to the Pharisees applies to us. We have plenty of evidence—Jesus’ birth, death, resurrection, and ascension, and centuries of his work in believers around the world. Instead of looking for additional evidence or miracles, accept what God has already given and move forward. He may use your life as evidence to reach another person.

12:39-40 He answered, “A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a miraculous sign! But none will be given it . . .”NIV Jesus refused to give the scribes and Pharisees a sign as they requested. Instead, he gave them an answer, explaining that a sign would come in his timing and that the sign would be unmistakable. Jesus had already called the religious leaders “evil” (12:34); the words “wicked” and “adulterous” are synonyms for evil. “Adulterous” applies to the apostasy of Israel. Marriage and adultery are images used in the Old Testament for God’s love and the nation’s unfaithfulness. By these words Jesus was showing that the religious leaders were not alone in their rejection of Jesus. Instead, they were representative of most of the nation who had chosen to reject him, just as the nation had chosen to reject God’s guidance and love in the past.

“. . . except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”NIV No sign would be given to them except the sign of the prophet Jonah. Jonah was a prophet sent to the Assyrian city of Nineveh (see the book of Jonah). Because Assyria was such a cruel and warlike nation, Jonah tried to run from his assignment and ended up spending three days in the belly of a huge fish. When Jonah got out, he grudgingly went to Nineveh, preached God’s message, and saw the city repent.

There are two possible meanings for this “sign of Jonah”:

  1. This may refer to a sign of judgment. God will not grant the religious leaders the miracle they asked for but will only point to their rejection of the message. In Jonah’s day, Nineveh was the capital of the Assyrian empire, and it was as powerful as it was evil (Jonah 1:2). The extremely wicked city of Nineveh repented at Jonah’s preaching; by contrast, when Jesus came to his people, they refused to repent.
  2. The “sign” granted to them may refer to the Resurrection. Jesus’ resurrection would prove that he is the Messiah. Three days after his death Jesus would come back to life, just as Jonah had been “brought back” to life after spending three days in the fish. Both had been delivered from death. Jonah’s presence was a sign to the people of Nineveh; they repented at his teaching. Jesus’ return to his people after his death will also be a sign to the people of his generation. Some will repent; many will not. Because of the strong emphasis on the Resurrection as a “sign” in the early church (Acts 2:22-36; 4:10-11), most likely the church took Jesus’ words to mean his resurrection. So this is the preferable meaning.

Some have been troubled with the statement “three days and three nights” because it seems to contradict the fact that Jesus died on Friday and was raised on Sunday. In Jewish reckoning, the inclusive days make the time span from death to resurrection three days, but not three nights. But such questioning is unnecessary. The Jews would have taken “three days and three nights” as an idiom for “three days” and would have seen no contradiction.

12:41 “The people of Nineveh will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, because they repented at the proclamation of Jonah, and see, something greater than Jonah is here!”NRSV The people of Nineveh will condemn those of Jesus’ generation at the judgment. The pagans repented at the preaching of Jonah, but the Jews and their religious leaders refused to repent at Jesus’ preaching. “Something greater than Jonah is here” refers to Jesus himself and his proclamation of the kingdom’s arrival (compare to 12:6, “something greater than the temple is here”). Jesus was their promised Messiah. The Jews should have recognized him. The religious leaders who knew prophecy should have been the first to proclaim Jesus as God’s Son. Instead, they rejected him; thus, they will face condemnation for their refusal to believe. (See also 11:21-24.)

12:42 “The Queen of the South will rise at the judgment with this generation and condemn it; for she came from the ends of the earth to listen to Solomon’s wisdom, and now one greater than Solomon is here.”NIV The Queen of the South (also called the Queen of Sheba) had traveled from southern Arabia to see Solomon, king of Israel, and to learn about his great wisdom (1 Kings 10:1-10). This unbelieving Gentile recognized the truth about God when it was presented to her, unlike the Jewish religious leaders who refused the truth even though it was staring them in the face. The Queen of the South, along with the people of Nineveh (12:41) will rise at the judgment and condemn those who refused to believe one greater than Solomon—the Messiah himself.

 LIFE APPLICATION – GOD WORKS IN STRANGE WAYS
Who would imagine that a caravan organized by an Arabian queen would become a symbol of God’s powerful Good News to millions of listeners and readers down through the ages? But it was, and the queen is rightly honored for her pursuit of God’s truth.
Don’t box God in. Wonderful things come from his often mysterious plan. Don’t box God’s purposes for your life. Surprises may come, turns in the road, odd moments you could not predict or plan. Take such events as opportunities, not problems. Regard the people in your life as willing listeners; treat each problem as an opportunity for prayer.

12:43-44 “When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it wanders through waterless regions looking for a resting place, but it finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ When it comes, it finds it empty, swept, and put in order.”NRSV To further describe how it will be with this evil generation (12:39, 45), Jesus told a parable focusing on the attitude of the nation of Israel and the religious leaders in particular. There is danger in attempting to be neutral about Jesus. Unfilled and complacent people are easy targets for Satan, as Jesus described in this parable. We cannot press the details of the parable as teaching doctrinal truth about demons (for example, the picture that demons liked to live in the desert was based on popular belief, not biblical fact). Jesus may have been only using popular beliefs in this parable to make his point.

The unclean spirit was not “cast out” but for some reason had gone out of a person. The desert (waterless regions) was believed to be the habitation of demons. Because demons need a resting place (that is, someone or something living that they can enter and torment), this demon returned to its former house when it could find nothing suitable in the desert. This sentence is probably conditional: “if” the demon decided to return. Demons do not always repossess people after they leave or are cast out. That would make exorcisms both worthless and an invitation to greater disaster (12:45). Jesus was making a point about the spiritual destiny of his listeners.

In its absence, the demon’s “house” had been cleaned up. But it was still empty. Therein lay the problem and the crux of Jesus’ teaching. The problem is not so much with the demons as it is with the condition of the “house.”

12:45 “Then it goes and brings along seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and live there; and the last state of that person is worse than the first. So will it be also with this evil generation.”NRSV The nation had been “swept clean” by the teaching and preaching of John the Baptist and of Jesus. Many had come to repent. But if the nation did not turn around, truly repenting from sin and turning to Jesus as their Messiah and Savior, they would be no better off than a clean but empty house. Into that house comes worse evil than before. Jesus pictured the demon finding seven others and returning to the clean house. But the “owner,” now filled with eight demons instead of one, is definitely worse off than before. So it will be also with this evil generation. God’s people, privileged with prophecy and promises, would be faced with horrible judgment for rejecting their Messiah.

JESUS DESCRIBES HIS TRUE FAMILY / 12:46-50

12:46-47 While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.”NIV Jesus’ mother was Mary (Luke 1:30-31), and his brothers were probably the other children Mary and Joseph had after Jesus (see also Mark 6:3-4). Some Christians believe the ancient tradition that Jesus was Mary’s only child. If this is true, the “brothers” were possibly cousins (often called brothers in those days). Some have offered yet another suggestion: When Joseph married Mary, he was a widower, and these were his children by his first marriage. Based on 13:55, these were Jesus’ half brothers, Mary and Joseph’s other children, because Jesus’ father was God, not Joseph.

Apparently Mary had gathered her family, and they had gone to find Jesus. Mark explained that “Jesus entered a house, and again a crowd gathered, so that he and his disciples were not even able to eat. When his family heard about this, they went to take charge of him, for they said, ‘He is out of his mind'” (Mark 3:20-21 niv). Mary hoped to use her personal relationship with Jesus to influence him. She saw her son in a busy ministry that was taking its toll on him. Perhaps she hoped to get him to come home; maybe she brought the brothers along to drag Jesus away from the crowd if necessary.

While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, the message from his family was relayed to him. Jesus’ family thought that because of their relationship with him, he would answer their request.

12:48 He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?”NIV Instead of going outside to see what his family members wanted, Jesus looked at the crowd and asked an odd question, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” Jesus knew why his family had come, yet he used their visit as a lesson in discipleship. A relationship with Jesus was not limited to those in his immediate family. Jesus opened this relationship to all people. His question could be rendered, “Who are the types of people who can have a family relationship with me?”

12:49-50 Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”NIV Jesus point[ed] to his disciples and answered his own question. The types of people who can have a relationship with him are those who do the Father’s will. They listen, learn, believe, and follow. Obedience is the key to discipleship. In these words, Jesus explained that in his spiritual family, the relationships are ultimately more important and longer lasting than those formed in his physical family.

Jesus was not denying his responsibility to his earthly family. On the contrary, he would criticize the religious leaders for not following the Old Testament command to honor their parents (Matthew 15:1-9). He would provide for his mother’s security as he hung on the cross (John 19:25-27). His mother and brothers would be present in the upper room at Pentecost (Acts 1:14). Instead, Jesus was pointing out that spiritual relationships are as binding as physical ones, and he was paving the way for a new community of believers to be formed as Jesus’ spiritual family. This family would be characterized by love; the members should desire to be together, work together, and share one another’s burdens.

www.RidgeFellowship.com
Source:   Life Application Bible Commentary – Matthew.

 

Posted in Matthew, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Matthew Chapter 11

Gospel of MatthewWelcome to day 11 in our reading of God’s word.  Today we read about John the Baptist being in prison and sending his disciples to confirm that Jesus is the Messiah.  Jesus responds and says some uplifting words about John.  Jesus talks about unresponsive people to the gospel and that he provides rest for the weary.

matthew-24-35JESUS EASES JOHN’S DOUBT / 11:1-19

Opposition against Jesus began to grow as Jesus prophesied in chapter 10. Even John the Baptist had some misunderstanding. At first the opposition is implicit; later it will be explicit.

11:1 After Jesus had finished instructing his twelve disciples, he went on from there to teach and preach in the towns of Galilee.NIV This verse forms a transition from chapter 10. Jesus finished instructing his twelve disciples (for the time being) and went on from there to teach and preach in the towns of Galilee. The constant separation between “teach” and “preach” in Matthew may prepare for didache (instruction) and kerygma (proclamation) in the early church.

Mark’s Gospel describes the sending out and return of the disciples (following Jesus’ instructions outlined in the previous chapter). Matthew, however, maintains his focus on Jesus’ ministry and teaching.

11:2-3 When John heard in prison what Christ was doing, he sent his disciples to ask him, “Are you the one who was to come, or should we expect someone else?”NIV King Herod, also known as Herod Antipas, had imprisoned John the Baptist (4:12). Herod Antipas was known for his insensitivity and debauchery. He had married his own sister-in-law, and John the Baptist had publicly rebuked Herod’s blatant sin (more on this incident in 14:1-12).

While John sat in prison, word came to him about what Christ was doing. John the Baptist had his own disciples who apparently remained close to him during his imprisonment. They brought news of Jesus’ activities, most likely those deeds that reflected that he was the Messiah (such as those described in chapters 8 and 9).

This caused John to wonder, so he sent his disciples back to Jesus with a question, Are you the one who was to come? John was referring to the promised Messiah. This statement provides a glimpse of John’s human side. He had baptized Jesus, had seen the heavens open, and had heard the voice of God (3:13-17), yet he was experiencing periods of doubt and questioning. The first step back from doubt to faith is to bring one’s plight to the Lord Jesus Himself. It is no sin to ask a question if our heart attitude is right.

V. Raymond Edman

 

Perhaps John was wondering why Jesus brought blessing but little judgment, for John had preached that Jesus would baptize with fire and separate the “wheat” from the “chaff” (3:11-12). Jesus’ peaceful teaching and healing ministry may not have seemed to measure up. Perhaps John was wondering about the veiled terms in which Jesus was giving his teachings.

Whatever the reason, John’s question functions as a conclusion to all that has happened so far in this Gospel, summarizing the necessary reaction to Jesus’ deeds and the mission of his disciples. It was not John’s question alone; the question highlights what every person must decide when he or she encounters Jesus. Matthew used the name “Christ” to show his readers that while John may have doubted, Jesus was unmistakably showing that he was indeed “the one who was to come.”

LIFE APPLICATION – HONEST QUESTIONS
Never be embarrassed when asking a sincere question. And never make anyone else feel ashamed to ask one. Even John the Baptist, God’s special messenger, had questions. To live is to discover, and no one learns without raising questions. Good questions indicate good listening.
Wonder about something the pastor said on Sunday? Ask. Wonder about something you read in Matthew’s Gospel? Ask. How does faith relate to the problems you face this week? Keep asking until you make some solid discoveries.

11:4-6 Jesus answered them, “Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the poor have good news brought to them. And blessed is anyone who takes no offense at me.”NRSV Jesus answered John’s doubts by telling John’s disciples to go and tell John what you hear and see. Jesus pointed to his acts of healing the blind, lame, deaf, and leprous, raising the dead, and preaching the Good News to the poor. With so much evidence, Jesus’ identity should have been obvious—Jesus expected his courageous forerunner to come to the correct conclusion. These words reflect Isaiah 35:5-6, Isaiah’s prophecy of the final kingdom. The Messiah’s arrival was the first phase of this coming kingdom. Jesus fulfilled these words even though Matthew had not yet recorded any healings of lame or deaf people, and Matthew added the cleansing of lepers and raising of dead people to Isaiah’s list. That the poor have good news brought to them reflects Isaiah 61:1. “The poor” are the small group of faithful followers, the oppressed and afflicted, who respond to the Good News. They are blessed because they take no offense at Jesus, willingly accepting him as the promised Messiah.

Many Jews, however, did take offense at Jesus. Some versions say “cause to stumble,” referring to Jews “stumbling” over Jesus because he did not meet their messianic expectations. While Jesus’ words and deeds were worthy of the Messiah, he did not meet the Jewish leaders’ political and nationalistic interpretations of him. So Jesus warned John and all the Jews not to allow their expectations to drive a wedge between them.

11:7-8 As they went away, Jesus began to speak to the crowds about John: “What did you go out into the wilderness to look at? A reed shaken by the wind? What then did you go out to see? Someone dressed in soft robes? Look, those who wear soft robes are in royal palaces.”NRSV As John’s disciples left with Jesus’ message, Jesus took the opportunity to address the crowds. He asked three questions and gave three answers. John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness, and people went out to listen to him (3:1, 5). Jesus asked if the people had gone into the wilderness to see a reed shaken by the wind. A “reed” is the canelike grass that grows on the banks of the Jordan River. To compare a person to a reed was to say that the person was without moral fiber or courage, easily tossed about by various opinions, never taking a stand on anything. Obviously, they did not go to see a “reed”—John’s fiery preaching was anything but that. The people who went out to see him had been attracted by the opposite quality.

Second, Jesus asked if they had gone out to see someone dressed in soft robes. Obviously, John’s rough attire (clothes made of camel’s hair, 3:4) hardly qualified as “soft robes.” If the people wanted to go look at someone dressed like that, they should go to the royal palaces (such as King Herod occupied), not to the wilderness. The people who went out to see John appreciated his prophetic power.

11:9-10 “Then what did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. This is the one about whom it is written: ‘I will send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way before you.'”NIV In this third question, Jesus asked if the people had gone out into the wilderness to see a prophet. That was, in fact, true—they had. The people knew that John’s appearance meant that something new was about to happen; many believed the age of the Messiah had come. They went out to see a prophet and had seen one; in fact, they had seen, Jesus said, more than a prophet. Jesus described John as “more” because he had inaugurated the messianic age and had announced the coming kingdom of God (see also 3:3). More than being a prophet, John had been the subject of prophecy, fulfilling Malachi 3:1 (and Exodus 23:20 in the Septuagint). Jesus changed the words “before me” to “before you” so the wording refers to Jesus as the Messiah.

11:11 “Truly I tell you, among those born of women no one has arisen greater than John the Baptist; yet the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.”NRSV The words “truly I tell you” indicate that Jesus was about to say something of supreme importance. The words “no one has arisen” use Old Testament language for the coming of a prophet. John the Baptist’s role as forerunner of the Messiah put him in a position of great privilege, described as “more than a prophet” (11:9) with no one . . . greater. No man ever fulfilled his God-given purpose better than John. Yet in God’s coming kingdom, all members will have a greater spiritual heritage than John because they will have seen and known Christ and his finished work on the cross. The least in the kingdom of heaven are those of the faithful followers who participate in the kingdom. John would die before Jesus would die and rise again to inaugurate his kingdom. Jesus’ followers, because they will witness the kingdom’s reality, will have privilege and place greater than John’s.

11:12 “From the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and the violent take it by force.”NRSV There are several views about the meaning of this verse. The interpretation hinges on the meaning of biazetai, “suffered violence” and biastai “the violent.” The niv gives this verse a more positive meaning by understanding biazetai to be in the middle voice rather than in the passive—thus, the rendering, “the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it.” This would mean that entering God’s kingdom takes aggressive, assertive action. The nrsv takes the verb as passive, indicating that the kingdom has suffered violence. This means that evil, violent forces have worked against the kingdom. Some have suggested that Jesus’ words had a temporal meaning, that they referred to Herod’s opposition to John as well as to the Jewish opponents of John and Jesus. Others interpret the entire phrase timelessly in reference to the word “kingdom,” implying the antagonism of satanic forces or the attempts of Jewish zealots to force the coming of the kingdom by overthrowing Rome. Most likely, this is a reference to Jesus’ opponents. Jesus was explaining that as his kingdom advanced, attacks against it by violent people would increase. He referred not to just one type of opposition, but to opposition in general. John the Baptist, as herald of the arrival of the kingdom of heaven, was already experiencing the “forcefulness” of evil men (Herod) against God’s kingdom. The conflict had begun.

11:13-15 “For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come. He who has ears, let him hear.”NIV All the Prophets and the Law had prophesied about the coming of God’s kingdom. The Jews called the Old Testament by its three main sections—the Prophets, the Law, and the Writings. In reality, all three point to Jesus’ coming (see 5:17-20). John fulfilled prophecy, for he himself was the Elijah who was to come, prophesied in Malachi 4:5. John was not a resurrected Elijah, but he took on Elijah’s prophetic role—boldly confronting sin and pointing people to God (Malachi 3:1). Jesus understood how difficult it was for the people to grasp all that they were seeing and hearing, for he said, “If you are willing to accept it.” Indeed, many would be unwilling. Only those who had ears would be able to truly hear what Jesus meant by the words he said. Only those with the desire of true disciples could truly understand Jesus’ words. He spoke in words that could easily put off the halfhearted follower. These were important words that could be easily misunderstood (see also 13:9, 43; 24:15).

LIFE APPLICATION – REALLY LISTENING
Jesus said that those who have ears should “hear.” Sometimes you can hear words, even understand words, and still not get the message. That often happened to the Pharisees, who knew the Bible better than anyone but didn’t really know it at all. Great listening requires
Understanding the context of a message. Words taken out of context are often misunderstood. Learn as much as you can about the whole situation.
Understanding the messenger. Who’s talking? What’s his or her credibility? What are the biases and presuppositions? Is the messenger trustworthy?
What’s the purpose of the message? “I have a dream” can be a stirring call to social justice or an appeal for help on a psychiatrist’s couch. What are the words doing to people?
Much of Jesus’ ministry was helping people listen better—to the Old Testament prophets and to God himself speaking through Jesus. Listen carefully!

11:16-19 “But to what shall I liken this generation? It is like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling to their companions, and saying: ‘We played the flute for you, and you did not dance; we mourned to you, and you did not lament.'”NKJV The phrase “to what shall I liken” was a common rabbinic introduction to a metaphor. Matthew used the word generation for Jews who rejected both John the Baptist and Jesus. Jesus condemned the attitude of his generation. No matter what he said or did, they took the opposite view. They were cynical and skeptical because he challenged their comfortable, secure, and self-centered lives. Jesus compared them to children sitting in the marketplaces, playing games in the public square where the city’s business was conducted. These games may copy the adults (such as playing instruments for a wedding or mourning at a funeral procession). The thrust is that some of the children called out to others to join them, but their companions ignored their invitation and went on playing their own games. Jesus’ generation, like the children in the square, was unresponsive to the calls issued by John the Baptist and by Jesus. Jesus continued: “For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, ‘He has a demon’; the Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!'”NRSV The one “mourning” refers to John the Baptist, who brought the message of confession and repentance to avoid the wrath of God. He came neither eating nor drinking, yet that did not satisfy the Jews. John was an ascetic; he did not seek out social occasions. They assumed that he had a demon (or was merely deranged). In contrast, the one “playing the flute” referred to Jesus (here he called himself Son of Man), who came eating and drinking. He joined in social occasions, and his diet was like other people’s. But that did not satisfy the Jews either. They simply labeled him as a glutton and a drunkard who hung out with the lowest sort of people. Many of the Jews in Jesus’ generation, including most of the religious establishment, simply refused to listen and went about their own “games.”

“Yet wisdom is vindicated by her deeds.”NRSV This is God’s wisdom, personified as a woman (her deeds). (See also Proverbs 1:20; 4:6; 7:4; 8:1 for more verses personifying wisdom.) God’s wisdom is seen in Jesus’ deeds. People could see the kingdom’s power through Jesus’ miracles. These miracles vindicated (justified) Jesus’ teaching. People might reject both the miracles and the teaching, but that will not change their truth nor will it hinder the kingdom’s arrival.

LIFE APPLICATION- THE BEST APOLOGETICS
The truth of Jesus’ words were vindicated by miracles, both the healings and the transformed lives of his followers. “Apologetics” is the discipline of setting out proofs for biblical truth. Why do we believe? People who “do apologetics” help us with that question.
Here, however, Jesus surprises us. The best proof that his words are true: It’s you! Your life changed from the inside out by Jesus’ power is the best evidence to a skeptical world that Jesus speaks the truth.
It’s a big responsibility, but go easy on yourself. Being a “perfect” person is impossible and self-defeating. Instead, just let Jesus work inside your heart and mind. The changes he brings will speak volumes to a watching world.

JESUS PROMISES REST FOR THE SOUL / 11:20-30

11:20 Then Jesus began to denounce the cities in which most of his miracles had been performed, because they did not repent.NIV Matthew’s thematic structure places Jesus’ denunciation of these cities immediately after he had spoken of being rejected by his own people (11:16-19). In Luke, these words are part of the mission discourse to the seventy-two disciples (Luke 10:13-16); Matthew used them to illustrate the rejection of the multitudes. The cities Jesus denounced were those in which most of his miracles had been performed. Because his words were vindicated by his deeds (11:19), those people should have been eager to repent and believe. Instead, they rejected Jesus, the Messiah. Many had followed Jesus and had eagerly come to him to be healed or to watch him heal, but few had repented and believed in him as the “one who was to come” (11:3).

11:21-22 “Woe to you, Korazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! If the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I tell you, it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you.”NIV For their unbelief, the unrepentant cities would receive judgment, and “woe” is an expression of grief or regret. The people of Korazin (also spelled “Chorazin”) and Bethsaida had seen Jesus firsthand (both cities were in Galilee); yet they stubbornly refused to repent of their sins and believe in him. Matthew recorded no miracles in either of these cities although, obviously, Jesus had done miracles there. The Gospel writers were necessarily selective in what they recorded. As John wrote at the end of his Gospel, “Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written” (John 21:25 niv).

Tyre and Sidon were ancient Phoenician cities with a long-standing reputation for wickedness (Isaiah 23; Ezekiel 27-28; Amos 1:9-10). God destroyed each city for its opposition to his people and for its wickedness as a center of Baal worship. (Destruction for Sidon had come at the hands of the Assyrians in 67 b.c.; for Tyre it had come at the hands of Alexander the Great who had built a causeway out to the island fortress and had destroyed it in 332 b.c.) Herod the Great partially restored Tyre. Citizens from there may well have heard these very words of Jesus.

Jesus said, however, that if he had performed the same miracles in those wicked cities, the people would have repented . . . in sackcloth and ashes. “Sackcloth and ashes” were symbols of humiliation, grief for sin, and repentance. Sackcloth was a cheap cloth made of camel or cattle hair, worn under or in place of garments during times of grief. For extreme grief, a person might also wear ashes on his or her head, or sit and wallow in ashes. Such would have been the display of repentance in these evil cities.

Because Korazin and Bethsaida had rejected Jesus, they would suffer even greater punishment than that of the wicked cities who did not see him. Those people had less opportunity to believe; therefore, they would be accountable for less. The day of judgment would be more bearable for them. Similarly, nations and cities with churches on every corner and Bibles in every home will have no excuse on Judgment Day if they do not repent and believe.

11:23-24 “And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to heaven? No, you will be brought down to Hades. For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I tell you that on the day of judgment it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.”NRSV Jesus singled out the city of Capernaum for special denunciation. Jesus had made his home in this city (4:12-13) and had performed countless miracles there (8:5-17; 9:2-8, 18-33; Mark 1:23-28). But would it be exalted to heaven for that reason? No, Jesus said, in fact, just the opposite. Instead of being “exalted,” it would be “brought down.” Instead of “heaven,” it would experience “Hades.” These words allude to one of Isaiah’s prophecies against Babylon (Isaiah 14:13-15). The word “Hades” is used in the Septuagint (Greek version of the Hebrew Old Testament) for “Sheol,” which is the Old Testament word for the grave, the abode of the dead. Here Jesus used it in a general sense for God’s judgment.

As in 11:21-22 above, Jesus was comparing a city that he personally had visited (in this case, had lived in) with one of the most evil cities in the Old Testament. Indeed, if the city of Sodom had seen Jesus’ deeds of power, Sodom would have remained until this day. God had destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah for their extreme wickedness (Genesis 18-19). Jesus implied that the city would have repented of its sin and therefore would not have been destroyed by God. Sodom and Gomorrah were already mentioned in 10:15 as being better off on the Day of Judgment than those cities who would refuse the disciples’ message. Even Capernaum itself would be worse off than the worst of the Old Testament cities, simply because it was the home of the Messiah. Its people had seen Jesus, and they had rejected him.

LIFE APPLICATION – CLOSE TO HOME
Capernaum, Jesus’ adult hometown, should, of all cities, have been keen to see the truth of God’s Good News. But it wasn’t. And on Judgment Day, a person will be happier to be from Sodom than from Capernaum.
How disastrous when those closest to truth turn away! Some churches do that when they move from faith to doubt, from a focus on Jesus to a focus on everything but Jesus. When selecting a church, look beyond the architecture, the greeting committees, and the nursery facilities. Is Jesus at the heart of it?

11:25-26 At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure.”NIV Jesus’ response to his rejection, however, was to praise his Father. “Praise” is a strong term for worship, signifying acceptance and thanksgiving for God’s act. The word for “Father” is the Aramaic Abba, signifying close relationship. “Lord of heaven and earth” is a Jewish title for God, stressing his lordship of the universe.

For what did Jesus praise the Father? He praised God for hiding the significance of his words and miracles from the wise and learned (that is, those arrogant in their own knowledge) and for revealing these to little children (those humbly open to receive the truth of God’s Word, a euphemism for his disciples). While this contrasted all self-sufficient and proud people with the humble, it was also a contrast between the self-righteous religious leaders and the humble and unlearned disciples. That God had revealed himself in this way was not an accident; it was his good pleasure. Spiritual understanding is not dependent on status, race, or education—it is God’s gift. (See also Isaiah 29:14; 1 Corinthians 1:19-20; James 4:6.) God is sovereign. He also hides and reveals as he chooses. Jesus delighted in this—what pleased the Father pleased the Son (as Jesus clearly stated in the next verse).

11:27 “All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.”NIV Jesus clearly stated his relationship to the Father of whom he spoke in 11:25. He made three unmistakable claims to special relationship with God:

  1. All things have been committed to me by my Father. These words explain shared knowledge. There are no secrets between Father and Son and never have been. The present perfect tense of “have been committed” indicates that this has been the case from eternity past into eternity future. Jesus is the only source of the revelation that is hidden or revealed (11:25-26).
  2. No one knows the Son except the Father. In the Old Testament, “know” means more than knowledge; it implies an intimate relationship. The communion between God the Father and God the Son is the core of their relationship. Jesus claimed an intimate relationship that no one else can ever have. Those who make Jesus out to be nothing more than a great teacher have ignored such statements as this, statements that force us to a decision as to whether Jesus really is who he claimed to be.
  3. No one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him. For anyone else to know God, God must reveal himself to that person, by the Son’s choice. How fortunate we are that Jesus has clearly revealed to us God, his truth, and how we can know him. People can only approach God through Jesus—he truly is the only way (John 14:6). That Jesus praised the Father for making this choice (11:26) and then explained that the Father had given the Son this authority again emphasizes Jesus’ true identity.

11:28 “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”NKJV While those wise and learned in their own eyes are blinded to the truth (11:25-26), Jesus invites those who labor and are heavy laden. The “wise and learned” Pharisees had placed so many rules and regulations on the people that religion had become like “labor,” and a life of devotion to the law had become a burden to carry (see 23:1-4). But Jesus invited the “little ones,” true disciples with eyes open to see the truth, to come to him and find relief from these labors. Jesus was clearly admonishing them to abandon Pharisaic legalism and join him.

Jesus’ gracious invitation extends to all. No one is omitted or neglected. All we must do is acknowledge our need and come to him. Jesus frees people from these burdens.

The rest that Jesus gives equals eternal life (Hebrews 4:9) and brings love, healing, and peace with God, not the cessation of work, effort, worship, or service. To the Jews, rest reminded them of the Promised Land given to their ancestors. Jesus applied the word “rest” to himself spiritually, “I will give you rest, I will refresh you.” (see Jeremiah 31:25). Ah, downcast soul, who art writing hard things of thyself, it may be that thy merciful Lord is viewing thy life more accurately and estimating it more lovingly than thou knowest!

F. B. Meyer

 

Those who follow Christ will find refreshment in their renewed relationship with him, freedom from guilt over sin, deliverance from fear and despair, and the promise of continued help and guidance from the Holy Spirit. (See Hebrews 3-4 for more on the New Testament view of rest.)

 LIFE APPLICATION – ONLY JESUS
“Pluralism” is a recent trend that seeks to promote respect for all points of view, all faiths, all ethnic traditions.
On the one hand, Christians should respect and care for all people, regardless of differences. There is no holy excuse for nastiness or prejudice.
But, on the other hand, Jesus alone is the world’s Savior. There is no other. You cannot worship a hundred gods, or two—there’s only one! Put all your trust in Jesus. Depend on him alone.

11:29-30 “Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.”NKJV A yoke is a heavy wooden harness that fits over the shoulders of an ox or oxen. It is attached to a piece of equipment that the oxen are to pull. Since Jesus was a carpenter and since carpenters in those days produced and repaired farm equipment, Jesus was quite familiar with yokes.

The Law was a “yoke” that was considered hard to bear (as Peter noted in Acts 15:10). Jesus used the familiar phrasing used of the law as an invitation to discipleship. “Take off the burdensome yoke of the Pharisee-styled law,” Jesus said, “and take My yoke upon you.” Following Jesus would not be a free ride; Jesus had already described the persecution and rejection his followers could expect (10:17-42). They were not free from all constraints; they would carry a yoke, but it would be easy and light. Again, this did not belittle the importance or difficulty of carrying out his mission; indeed, Jesus asked for more than mere obedience to the law. Discipleship required extraordinary effort. These words focused on Jesus’ care and concern for his followers, his promise of guidance and presence (28:20), and the ultimate future rewards. The efforts of Jesus’ followers would not result in dead-end toil or drudgery or in frustrating cycles of guilt and depression from trying to please God by being good enough. Jesus’ yoke would result in fruitful service. Jesus had God’s ultimate authority (11:27), and he was calling them to him. These images come from Old Testament prophecy about the Messiah (see Isaiah 42:2-3; 53:1-2; Zechariah 9:9). He would not be an unkind taskmaster; instead, he would bring rest to the souls of his followers (quoted from Jeremiah 6:16).

Jesus said, “Learn from Me.” Jesus, their leader and example, was also the ultimate servant, gentle and lowly in heart. His path of humble service is the pattern for us to follow. So much of our fatigue and burdensome toil stems from pride. If we are successful, our egos are inflated and we try for more. If we falter, the rejection of others and our self-condemnation weigh us down in guilt and self-doubt. It is much more freeing to take Christ’s attitude of serving others.

LIFE APPLICATION – EASY DOES IT!
Responsibilities weigh us down, even the job of staying true to God. It’s a tough grind, and you’re tired. You may be trying hard and still falling short of the mark. Jesus says, “My yoke is easy.”
Jesus doesn’t offer you a lawn chair and soda—the yoke is still an oxen’s tool for working hard. But it’s a special kind of yoke, with weight falling on bigger shoulders than yours. Someone with more pulling power is up front helping. Suddenly you’re sharing life’s responsibilities with a great Partner—and now that frown is turning into a smile, and that gripe into a song.

www.RidgeFellowship.com
Source:  Life Application Bible Commentary – Matthew.

Posted in Matthew | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Matthew Chapter 10

Gospel of Matthewmatthew-24-35Thanks for reading through the gospel of Matthew with us!  I’m praying for you.   Today’s entire chapter is about Jesus sending out the twelve disciples to do ministry along with his instructions and warnings to them.

JESUS SENDS OUT THE TWELVE DISCIPLES / 10:1-16

This chapter describes Jesus’ appointment of the Twelve for their first apostolic mission. Though this was the first time they went out on their own, they had been given authority from Jesus to carry on the work of preaching and healing.

10:1 He called his twelve disciples to him and gave them authority to drive out evil spirits and to heal every disease and sickness.NIV Jesus had many disciples (learners), but he appointed twelve to whom he gave authority and special training. The twelve disciples had already joined Jesus (Mark 3:14-19, see also the Harmony of the Gospels at the back of this commentary), but Matthew waited until writing his missionary discourse to introduce these twelve disciples. This records the first time Jesus sent them out on their own. These men were his inner circle. Many people followed and listened to Jesus, but these twelve received the most intense training. We see the impact of these men throughout the rest of the New Testament. They started the Christian church. The Gospels call these men the “disciples” or the “Twelve”; the book of Acts calls them apostles. The choice of twelve men is highly symbolic. The number twelve corresponds to the twelve tribes of Israel (19:28), showing the continuity between the old religious system and the new one based on Jesus’ message. Jesus looked upon his mission as the gathering of the true people of God. These men were the righteous remnant (the faithful believers throughout the Old Testament who never abandoned God or his law) who would carry on the work the twelve tribes were chosen to do—to build the community of God. These were the righteous remnant chosen out of the apostate nation and given a twofold responsibility: (1) to represent the nation before God; (2) to reach the nation for God. The Gospels and Epistles stressed the ministry of the twelve men together and its significance. The number was so important that when Judas Iscariot killed himself, the disciples chose another man to replace him (see Acts 1:15-26).

These twelve men had Jesus’ authority over the forces of evil. Jesus empowered his disciples to drive out evil spirits. The disciples could speak the word, and God’s power would cast out the demons. Jesus also gave these disciples power to heal every disease and sickness. It was important that they have these powers because Jesus was extending his mission through them. Jesus directly confronted demons and sicknesses. The disciples carried Jesus’ purpose and his power.

 LIFE APPLICATION – CALLED AND CHOSEN
Jesus “called” his twelve disciples. He didn’t draft them, force them, or ask them to volunteer; he chose them to serve him in a special way. Jesus did not choose these twelve to be his disciples because of their faith—it often faltered. He didn’t choose them because of their talent and ability—no one stood out with unusual ability. The disciples represented a wide range of backgrounds and life experiences, but apparently they may have had no more leadership potential than those who were not chosen. The one characteristic they all shared was their willingness to obey Jesus. Christ calls us today. He doesn’t twist our arms and make us do something we don’t want to do. We can choose to join him or remain behind. When Christ calls you to follow him, how do you respond? Have you given him only a halfhearted commitment or your whole heart?

10:2-4 These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter).NIV In verse 1, these men are called “disciples”; here, the word “apostles” is used to stress their role as messengers, “sent ones.”

The first name recorded was Simon, to whom Jesus had given the name Peter (see John 1:42). Jesus “surnamed” him Peter, meaning that he had given him a name in addition to the one he already had—he did not change Simon’s name. Peter was also called Cephas. “Peter” is the Greek equivalent of the Aramaic Cephas—a word meaning “stone” or “rock.” Peter had been a fisherman (4:18). He became one of three in Jesus’ core group among the disciples. He also confessed that Jesus was the Messiah (16:16). Although, later, Peter would deny ever knowing Jesus, he eventually would become a leader in the Jerusalem church, write two letters that appear in the Bible (1 and 2 Peter), and be crucified for his faith.

His brother Andrew.NIV Andrew was Peter’s brother and also a fisherman (4:18). Andrew had been a disciple of John the Baptist and had accepted John the Baptist’s testimony that Jesus was “the Lamb of God.” He had left John to follow Jesus and then had brought his brother Simon Peter to Jesus (John 1:35-42). Andrew and John were Jesus’ first disciples (John 1:35-40); Andrew then had brought Peter to Jesus (John 1:41-42).

James son of Zebedee, and his brother John.NIV James and John had also been fishermen (4:21). James would become the first apostle to be martyred (Acts 12:2). John would write the Gospel of John, the letters of 1, 2, and 3 John, and the book of Revelation. The brothers may have been related to Jesus (distant cousins); thus, at one point their mother requested special places for them in Christ’s kingdom (20:20-28).

Philip. Philip was the fourth to meet Jesus. John 1:43 states, “The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, he said to him, ‘Follow me'” (niv). Philip then brought Nathanael (also called Bartholomew)—see John 1:45. Philip probably knew Andrew and Peter because they were from the same town, Bethsaida (John 1:44).

Bartholomew. Scholars think that Bartholomew is the same person as Nathanael. In the list of disciples here and in Mark, Philip and Bartholomew are listed together (Mark 3:18); in John’s Gospel, Philip and Nathanael are paired up (John 1:45). Thus, it stands to reason that since John does not mention Bartholomew and the other Gospels do not mention Nathanael, then Nathanael and Bartholomew must be the same person. Bartholomew was an honest man; indeed, Jesus’ first words to him were, “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false” (John 1:47 niv). Bartholomew at first rejected Jesus because Jesus was from Nazareth. But upon meeting Jesus, his attitude changed, and he exclaimed, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!” (John 1:49 nrsv).

Thomas. We often remember this disciple as “Doubting Thomas” because he doubted Jesus’ resurrection (John 20:24-25). But he also loved the Lord and was a man of great courage. When Jesus determined to return to Judea and enemy territory, Thomas said to the disciples, “Let us also go, that we may die with him” (John 11:16 niv). Thomas was tough and committed, even if he tended to be pessimistic. Thus, when the other disciples said that Jesus was alive, Thomas did not believe them. However, when Thomas saw and touched the living Christ, doubting Thomas became believing Thomas.

Matthew the tax collector. Matthew, author of this Gospel, described himself by his former profession, probably to show the change that Jesus had made in his life. Also known as Levi, he had been a tax collector (9:9). Thus, he had been a despised outcast, but he had abandoned that corrupt (though lucrative) way of life to follow Jesus.

James son of Alphaeus.NIV This disciple is designated as son of Alphaeus to differentiate him from James the son of Zebedee (and brother of John) in 10:2. He is also called “James the younger” (Mark 15:40). Matthew is also called “son of Alphaeus” in Mark 2:14, but James and Matthew were probably not related.

Thaddaeus.NIV Thaddaeus is also called “Judas son of James” (see Luke 6:16; Acts 1:13).

Simon the Zealot.NIV Some versions of Scripture call this disciple Simon the Canaanite. Simon was probably not a member of the party of Zealots, for that political party did not appear until a.d. 68. Most likely the word “Zealot” that is used here indicates zeal for God’s honor and not extreme nationalism; it was an affectionate nickname.

Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him.NIV The name “Iscariot” is probably a compound word meaning “the man from Kerioth.” Thus, Judas’s hometown was Kerioth in southern Judea (see Joshua 15:25), making him the only one of the Twelve who was not from Galilee. It was Judas, son of Simon Iscariot (John 6:71), who would betray Jesus to his enemies and then commit suicide (27:3-5; Luke 22:47-48).

 LIFE APPLICATION – NO LITTLE PEOPLE
The list of Jesus’ twelve disciples does not give us many details—probably because there were not many impressive details to tell.
Jesus called people from all backgrounds and occupations—fishermen, religious activists, tax collectors. He called common people and uncommon leaders; rich and poor; educated and uneducated. Today, many people think only certain people can follow Christ, but this was not the attitude of the Master himself. God can use anyone, no matter how insignificant he or she appears. When you feel small and useless, remember that God uses ordinary people to do his extraordinary work.

10:5-6 These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.”NIV Jesus sent out the twelve disciples on a mission to preach the coming of the kingdom (10:7) and exercise the authority over demons and sickness that Jesus gave them (10:1). Jesus gave specific instructions, however, regarding the focus of their ministry: “Do not go among the Gentiles or . . . Samaritans.” A “Gentile” was anyone who was not a Jew. The “Samaritans” were a race that resulted from intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles after the Old Testament captivities (see 2 Kings 17:24). When the Jews returned from exile, they refused to allow the Samaritans to help them rebuild the temple (Ezra 4). As a result, the Samaritans developed their own religion, accepting only the Pentateuch as God’s authoritative word. In 109 b.c., the Jews burned the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim.

This did not mean that Jesus opposed evangelizing Gentiles and Samaritans; in fact, Matthew had already described Jesus’ encounter with Gentiles (8:28-34), and John 4 recounts his conversation with a Samaritan woman. Jesus’ command to go rather to the lost sheep of Israel means that the disciples should spend their time among the Jews (see also 15:24). These words restricted the disciples’ “short-term” mission to Galilee. Gentile territory lay to the north and Samaritan territory to the south. Jesus came not to the Jews only, but to the Jews “first” (Romans 1:16). God chose them to tell the rest of the world about him. Later, these disciples would receive the commission to “go and make disciples of all nations” (28:19 niv). Jewish disciples and apostles preached the gospel of the risen Christ all around the Roman empire, and soon Gentiles were pouring into the church. The Bible clearly teaches that God’s message of salvation is for all people, regardless of race, sex, or national origin (Genesis 12:3; Isaiah 25:6; 56:3-7; Malachi 1:11; Acts 10:34, 35; Romans 3:29, 30; Galatians 3:28).

“Sheep” was an affectionate term used often of God’s people in the Old Testament, as in Isaiah 53:6; Jeremiah 50:6; Ezekiel 34. We can see their “lostness” in the thoughtless rituals and man-made laws commanded by their religious leaders. Jesus, the Good Shepherd, came to regather the lost sheep.

10:7-8 “And as you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand.’ Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons. Freely you have received, freely give.”NKJV

The disciples went out as Jesus’ representatives, spreading his message. John the Baptist and Jesus had preached “the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (3:2; 4:17 nkjv), so he sent his disciples out to also preach that the kingdom of heaven was near. The Jews were waiting for the Messiah to usher in his kingdom. They were hoping for a political and military kingdom that would free them from Roman rule and bring back the days of glory under David and Solomon. [Missions is] a tale of tears, trials, testings, and triumphs, of opposition, of substituting human devices for divine methods, of candle lights in the darkness, and the bright shining of a new day.

V. Raymond Edman

 

But Jesus was talking about a spiritual kingdom. The gospel today is that the kingdom is still “near.” Jesus, the Messiah, has already begun his kingdom on earth in the hearts of his followers. One day the kingdom will be fully realized. The disciples were also to use the authority and power he had given them (10:1) to heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, and cast out demons, just as they had seen Jesus do. These four miracles were exactly the miracles Jesus had done and would demonstrate that the disciples had Jesus’ power.

Jesus gave the disciples a principle to guide their actions as they ministered to others: Freely you have received, freely give. The disciples had received salvation and the kingdom without cost; they should give their time under the same principle. Because God has showered us with his blessings, we should give generously to others of our time, love, and possessions.

LIFE APPLICATION – FREELY GIVE
Pastors, teachers, and missionaries should not plan on getting rich by their pastoring or teaching. Full-time Christian workers deserve a reasonable wage for their labors, but not an enriching one, nor should profit play a part in anything they provide or do. The spirit of capitalism—maximum profit for minimum investment—has no place in the church’s ministry.
Beware of well-heeled ministries, preachers who parade diamond rings or tailored suits, mission agencies overly dependent on Western wealth, and churches where six-figure salaries chair all the committees. Jesus sets the precedent for kingdom work: It is to be more humble than showy, more economically marginal than heavily endowed, more trustful in God than in upscale donors.

10:9-10 “Do not take along any gold or silver or copper in your belts; take no bag for the journey, or extra tunic, or sandals or a staff; for the worker is worth his keep.”NIV These instructions seem, at first, to be contrary to normal travel plans, but they simply reveal the urgency of the task and its temporary nature. Jesus sent the disciples in pairs (Mark 6:7), expecting them to return with a full report. This was a training mission; they were to leave immediately and travel light, taking along only minimal supplies. They were to depend on God and on the people to whom they ministered (10:11). Most people leaving on a journey would carry money in their belts. Normally each one would carry a bag for the journey to carry supplies, an extra tunic for added warmth at night, sandals to protect feet on rough terrain, and a staff for help in walking. But Jesus forbade them to take along any of these things.

Mark recorded that Jesus instructed the disciples to take nothing with them except staffs, while the accounts in Matthew and Luke say that Jesus told them not to take staffs. One explanation for this difference is that Matthew and Luke were referring to a club used for protection, whereas Mark was talking about a shepherd’s crook used for walking. Another explanation is that according to Matthew and Luke, Jesus was forbidding them to acquire an additional staff or sandals, but instead to use what they already had. The point in all three accounts is the same: The disciples were to leave at once, without extensive preparation, trusting in God’s care rather than in their own resources. Jesus’ instructions pertained only to this particular mission. Indeed, just after Jesus and the disciples ate the Last Supper, Jesus would ask them: “‘When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?’ ‘Nothing,’ they answered. He said to them, ‘But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one'” (Luke 22:35-36 niv). Different times and situations would call for different measures, but Christian workers still can reveal the simplicity of Christ when they carry out ministry without excessive worldly entanglements.

Jesus said “the worker is worth his keep,” meaning that those who minister are to receive care from those to whom they minister. The disciples could expect food and shelter in return for the spiritual service they provided. These words are paralleled in Luke 10:17 and were quoted by Paul in 1 Timothy 5:18, where they are given the ascription, “the Scripture”—alongside a quotation of Deuteronomy 25:4. Thus, this Scripture was used by Paul to urge the churches to financially support the workers among them.

10:11 “Whatever town or village you enter, find out who in it is worthy, and stay there until you leave.”NRSV Each pair of disciples would enter a town or village and stay in a worthy person’s house (that is, the home of a believer who had invited them to lodge there during their ministry). The command to stay there until they left the city cautioned them never to offend their hosts by looking for “better” lodging in a home that was more comfortable or socially prominent. To remain in one home would not be a burden for the home owner because the disciples’ stay in each community would be brief. The “worthy” were those who would respond to and believe the gospel message.

Jesus instructed the disciples to depend on others while they went from town to town preaching the gospel. Their purpose was to blanket Galilee with Jesus’ message, and by traveling light they could move quickly. Their dependence on others had three other good effects: (1) It clearly showed that the Messiah had not come to offer wealth to his followers; (2) it forced the disciples to rely on God’s power and not on their own provision; and (3) it involved the villagers, making them more eager to hear the message. Staying in homes was an excellent approach for the disciples’ short-term mission; this was not to be a permanent way of life for them. Yet the faith and simplicity that this way of life portrayed would serve them well in the future.

10:12-13 “And when you go into a household, greet it. If the household is worthy, let your peace come upon it. But if it is not worthy, let your peace return to you.”NKJV As the disciples entered a household, they were to greet it. The actual words of this greeting are recorded in Luke 10:5, “When you enter a house, first say, ‘Peace to this house'” (niv). At this time, people believed that blessings could be given as well as taken back. The disciples would bless the household upon entering. If the household is worthy (that is, had accepted them and their message), then the blessing of peace would remain upon that house. But if the household is not worthy (that is, did not accept their message), then the blessing of peace would return to the disciples, who would then leave that house. The peace returning from that house also indicated judgment to come (10:15). The words of blessing that the disciples had given would not be fulfilled there. These words mean that those who would receive the disciples also would receive the Messiah. Those who cared for God’s emissaries would receive blessing in return: “Whoever welcomes you welcomes me, and whoever welcomes me welcomes the one who sent me” (10:40 nrsv).

10:14 “If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town.”NRSV The disciples should also expect rejection, such as Jesus had faced in Decapolis (8:34). So Jesus further instructed that if anyone did not welcome them (that is, take them in and offer hospitality) and refused even to listen to them, then they should shake off the dust from their feet as they left.

Shaking off dust that accumulated on one’s sandals showed extreme contempt for an area and its people, as well as the determination not to have any further involvement with them. “Dust” was so common on highways that it came to signify that which clings to one’s life (such as sin). To shake the dust off one’s feet was a gesture of total repudiation. Pious Jews shook dust from their feet after passing through Gentile cities or territory to show their separation from Gentile influences and practices. When the disciples shook the dust from their feet after leaving a Jewish town, it would be a vivid sign that they wished to remain separate from people who had rejected Jesus.

Shaking off the dust of a place, Jesus said, would be a testimony against the people. Its implications were clear and had eternal consequences. The act showed the people that the disciples had discharged their duty, had nothing further to say, and would leave the people to answer to God. We should not take this verse to mean that if one member of a family refuses to accept Christ, we should abandon effort to the other members. Nor should we stop ministry to others in a community if there are some who reject our words. Jesus was saying that if the disciples were rejected by nonbelieving Jews, they should treat those Jews the same as nonbelieving Gentiles. By this statement, Jesus was making it clear that the listeners were responsible for what they did with the gospel. As long as the disciples had faithfully and carefully presented the message, they were not to blame if the townspeople rejected it. Likewise, we are not responsible when others reject Christ’s message of salvation, but we do have the responsibility to share the gospel clearly and faithfully.

10:15 “Assuredly, I say to you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city!”NKJV God had destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by fire from heaven because of their wickedness (Genesis 19:24-25). To Jews, the judgment of these cities was a lesson not only in punishment of great evil, but also in the finality of divine judgment. Those who reject the gospel will be worse off in the day of judgment than the wicked people of these destroyed cities who never had heard the gospel at all.

10:16 “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.”NIV The disciples would go out with the message like sheep among wolves (the “wolves” were the enemies of the believers—in this context probably the Jewish religious leaders). The solution? Be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves. These words may have come from a local proverb. To be “shrewd as snakes” speaks of prudence or cleverness. The Egyptian symbol of wisdom is a serpent, which has great skill in avoiding danger. They were also to be “innocent as doves,” that is, to be sincere and to have pure intentions. Shrewdness can become no more than cunning without the balance of innocence. However, innocence can become naïveté, or even ignorance if not balanced with shrewdness. Jesus’ followers would need both to be prepared for the battles that lay ahead. They would need to be unafraid of conflict but also able to deal with it in integrity. Jesus warned them that the gospel would not be warmly welcomed in all places. At times there would be outright antagonism, as Jesus describes in the following verses.

 LIFE APPLICATION – SENSIBLE SHEEP?
The opposition of the Pharisees would be like ravaging wolves. The disciples’ only hope would be to look to their Shepherd for protection. We may face similar hostility. Like the disciples, we should not be sheeplike in our attitude (thoughtless and unprepared), but sensible and prudent. We are not to be gullible pawns, but neither are we to be deceitful connivers. We must find a balance between wisdom and vulnerability in order to accomplish God’s work.

JESUS PREPARES THE DISCIPLES FOR PERSECUTION / 10:17-42

10:17-18 “Beware of them, for they will hand you over to councils and flog you in their synagogues; and you will be dragged before governors and kings because of me, as a testimony to them and the Gentiles.”NRSV The danger of arrest and persecution would come from without (governors, kings, Gentiles) and from within (councils, synagogues). The “councils” were the local courts that settled small problems among the Jews. In the early days of the church, these were the prosecutors. “Flogging” was a form of punishment where a person was whipped with a leather whip across the back; the law allowed a maximum of forty lashes. These floggings often occurred in the synagogues themselves. The “governors and kings” referred to the pagan rulers who alone could demand the death penalty. The persecution, and perhaps death, that the disciples would face because of their relationship with Christ would be a testimony to the religious leaders and to the Gentiles. These persecutions would provide opportunities for presenting the gospel. Later, the disciples experienced these hardships (Acts 5:40; 12:1-3; 22:19; 2 Corinthians 11:24). Interestingly, the word “martyr” comes from this Greek word “witness” or “testimony.”

Why would this happen? The new movement of Christianity would eventually face great opposition—from Jews and Gentiles alike. While it may not have seemed possible as these disciples roamed the hillsides with the popular teacher, a day would come when some would have to choose between their faith and persecution (or death). Jesus warned that they would need to focus on their mission and turn their defense into a testimony for their faith. In times of persecution, we can be confident and hopeful because Jesus has “overcome the world” (John 16:33).

 LIFE APPLICATION –  BEWARE
Christians are not called to naïveté. We shouldn’t be thoughtless and needn’t be conned. We’re not fools and don’t have to play the sucker to anyone’s shell game.
It’s one thing to suffer persecution, and another to walk stupidly into the middle of a fire. “Beware” alerts us to study human nature, know the world we live in, and exercise caution without cynicism. If you’re basically clueless about how the world works, find a mature Christian who can teach you street smarts without compromising standards. There is no harm in knowing the other party’s game plan.

10:19-20 “When they hand you over, do not worry about how you are to speak or what you are to say; for what you are to say will be given to you at that time; for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.”NRSV Jesus told the disciples that when (not “if”) they were arrested and handed over to the authorities, they should not worry about what to say in their defense. The thought of being brought before Gentile rulers terrified any Jew, but Jesus warned his disciples not to be afraid. What you are to say will be given to you at that time—God’s Spirit would speak through them. The phrase “Spirit of your Father” is Old Testament language and recalls the inspiration of the prophets. Jesus described the Holy Spirit as a defense lawyer coming to the disciples’ aid. This verse and 3:11 are the only places in which Matthew mentions the Holy Spirit. This promise of an infilling of the Holy Spirit was fulfilled in Acts 2, where the Spirit empowered the disciples to speak. Some mistakenly think this means believers do not have to prepare to present the gospel because God will take care of everything. Scripture teaches, however, that we are to make carefully prepared, thoughtful statements (Colossians 4:6). Jesus was telling his followers to prepare but not to worry. He promised special inspiration for times of great need.

10:21-22 “Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death; and you will be hated by all because of my name.”NRSV Jesus detailed some aspects of the coming persecution. The Jews considered family denunciations and betrayals a sign of the end times. These words may allude to Micah 7:6, “For the son treats the father with contempt, the daughter rises up against her mother, the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; your enemies are members of your own household” (nrsv). This passage speaks of internal corruption in Israel; Jesus said this was a sign of the last days. Not only will faith in Jesus tear families apart, but believers will also find that they will be hated by all types of people. As Jesus’ disciples share his authority, they will also share his sufferings.

 LIFE APPLICATION – FAMILY BETRAYAL
When those closest to you become your worst enemies, you may wonder if faith is worth the hassle. Consider these four questions:
1. Who’s closest to you really?
2. Whom can you count on when even a parent thinks you’re on the wrong track?
3. Who demands first priority in your life?
4. Who can work miracles to mend a disrupted family?
If your response to all four questions is “Jesus,” then you also know who loves your family more than you can and who wants to reach them with God’s love, probably through you. Trust the Lord for each relationship you think is lost. Jesus is in the miracle business.

“But the one who endures to the end will be saved.”NRSV These words have received a variety of interpretations. (1) The one who endures to the end of persecution (that is, keeps the faith through suffering) will be delivered from physical suffering. This we know can’t be true because some have been martyred for their faith.

(2) “The one who endures to the end” of life’s trials will be saved into eternal life. That person will not face spiritual harm. This view tends to support a “salvation by works” viewpoint. (3) The one who endures until the end (meaning wholly, completely) will enter into Christ’s kingdom. This view is more likely because standing firm to the end is not a way to be saved but the evidence that a person is really committed to Jesus. Persistence is not a means to earn salvation; it is the by-product of a truly devoted life. Besides being put to death they [Christians under Nero’s persecution] were made to serve as objects of amusement; they were clad in the hides of beasts and torn to death by dogs; others were crucified; others set on fire to serve to illuminate the night.

Tacitus, Roman historian

 

Jesus’ point was that persecution will come and his followers must be patient and faithful through it. Their reward is certain.

10:23 “When they persecute you in one town, flee to the next.”NRSV While Jesus told the disciples to expect persecution, he also warned them against foolhardiness. If they faced persecution in one town, they were to flee to the next. They ought not cast their pearls before swine (7:6), nor should they abort their ministry in fear. They were to leave and move on if the persecution became too great. Perhaps this is part of being “shrewd as snakes” (10:16). Persecution was a regular experience of the early church. The apostle Paul faced intense persecution. He fled Damascus by going down over the wall in a basket (Acts 9:25). After being stoned and left for dead outside of Lystra, Paul got up and moved on to Derbe (Acts 14:19-20). Persecution did not halt the mission of the early church; in many instances, it forced the believers to move out into the world to spread the gospel (Acts 11:19).

“For truly I tell you, you will not have gone through all the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes.”NRSV This difficult sentence has received many interpretations. Following are four:

  1. Some have understood this to focus on the immediate context of verses 5-16. The disciples would not have time to go through all the towns before Jesus would catch up with them. This interpretation is too simple, however, given the language in the text that refers to events after the resurrection of Christ. At the time of Matthew’s writing, the disciples had completed the mission, so Jesus obviously was referring to something else.
  2. Some suggest that the coming of the Son of Man refers to his coming judgment against the Jews, fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem in d. 70. But it is an unlikely interpretation to connect the destruction of Jerusalem with the return of the Son of Man.
  3. Still others explain that the “coming” refers to Jesus’ appearance in triumph after his resurrection.
  4. Because of the events of the book of Acts, it seems more likely that Jesus was referring to events after his resurrection. The meaning of his words would be that the task of the mission to the Jews would be so great and so difficult (for many would refuse to believe) that it would not be accomplished even by the time of his second coming.

10:24-25 “A student is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his master. It is enough for the student to be like his teacher, and the servant like his master. If the head of the house has been called Beelzebub, how much more the members of his household!”NIV Jesus used a common proverb stated two ways (student and teacher; servant and master) to show that both must share the same experiences. A student or servant is not above the teacher or master. In Judaism, a student (disciple) shared the daily experiences of his teacher; in pagan cultures, a servant fought beside his master. Both receive the same treatment.

Jesus used a play on words by saying if the head of the house has been called Beelzebub because “Beelzebub” meant “lord of the dwelling.” Beelzebub was the god of Ekron (2 Kings 1:2-3, 6, 16). Beelzeboul (Greek) may have been a term coined on the spot by Jesus’ accusers. The word has two parts: “Baal” which was the name for local Canaanite fertility gods in the Old Testament, and “Zebul” which means “exalted dwelling.” This became a name for Satan himself, prince of the demons. The Pharisees did this very act, accusing Jesus of using Beelzebub’s power to drive out demons (see 12:24). If Jesus, who is perfect, was called evil, how much more the members of his household. Jesus’ followers should expect that they would face similar accusations. God promises to vindicate those who stand firm (10:22).

LIFE APPLICATION – STICKS AND STONES
Jesus was accused of being Beelzebub, and he told his followers to expect the same treatment. Words are powerful weapons, and Jesus’ disciples can count on hearing a good number of bad ones slung at them.
When you’re the victim of intimidation or slander, keep your cool. Jesus took those knocks too. Instead of getting testy, try laughing a little because trading insult for insult is never Jesus way.

10:26 “Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.”NKJV Jesus’ followers can expect persecution, but they must never be afraid. “Do not fear,” Jesus said. The gospel mission must be accomplished. The parallel in the phrases (nothing covered or hidden that will not be revealed or known) stresses that the truths entrusted to the disciples will be known no matter what the opposition. There is also a hint that the knowledge of the kingdom was presently vague or known in only a limited way, but would later be openly revealed by God. Although the truth may be “hidden” or kept secret for a while, it will not remain so. One day the truth will be “revealed” and “known.” Jesus was speaking of the days of his ministry as the time of using parables, concealing the truth, and being rejected by many. The time of revelation would be either Jesus’ resurrection and ascension (when his followers would fully understand Jesus’ words) or the Second Coming. Jesus’ followers did not understand everything about Jesus at that time, but one day all their questions would be answered.

10:27 “What I say to you in the dark, tell in the light; and what you hear whispered, proclaim from the housetops.”NRSV The dark is not a picture of sin, but of privacy. What Jesus had told them privately they were to proclaim publicly. These parallel phrases (dark and light; what you hear whispered and proclaim from the housetops) describe bold, public proclamation of the truths that Jesus had taught the disciples privately. To “proclaim from the housetops” pictured the common practice (since roofs were flat) of using roofs as platforms for making public announcements. The disciples had a mission and a responsibility to teach what they learned from Jesus.

10:28 “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”NIV The disciples might face death, yet Jesus warned them not to be afraid. People might be able to kill the body, but they would not be able to kill the soul. The only One worthy of our fear is God who can destroy both soul and body in hell. It is far more fearful to disobey God than to face martyrdom. The worst that people can do (kill the body) does not compare with the worst that God can do. While the Greeks believed that only the soul lived on after death, Jesus says unmistakably that hell is a place of destruction for soul and body—the whole person. (For more on hell, see commentary on 5:22.) Some have interpreted this as annihilation, the complete destruction of the person. But that conclusion is unwarranted by this verse. More likely, it is hyperbole, representing the fearful judgment of God. We are not to be afraid of people, but we are to be afraid of (that is, in awe of) God.

10:29-31 “Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground apart from the will of your Father. And even the very hairs of your head are all numbered. So don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.”NIV This awesome God whom we are to fear (10:28) is also the God who cares about the smallest sparrow. When we fear him, we have nothing to worry about because he loves us. Sparrows were the cheapest type of living food sold in the market; a penny was the smallest copper coin. Sparrows were not of high value in the world—a penny could buy two of them. Yet God is so concerned for them that not one falls to the ground without God’s consent. That God knows the number of the very hairs on our heads shows his concern about the most trifling details about each of us. Because God is aware of everything that happens to sparrows, and because he knows every tiny detail about us, Jesus concludes that his followers need never be afraid. Sparrows will fall to the ground; God’s people will die, sometimes by martyrdom. Yet we are so valuable that God sent Jesus, his only Son, to die for us (John 3:16). Because God places such value on us, we need never fear personal threats or difficult trials. God our Father is in control. He sees the sparrow fall; he knows and controls everything that happens to us. God cares not only about the “big” problems and situations of life, but also about the tiniest details.

 LIFE APPLICATION – WHEN BAD NEWS COMES
During the Vietnam war, the worst sight in the world (Stateside) was two dress uniforms walking up to a door. It meant a casualty at that house, and many tears were shed at those doorsteps.
Bad news comes. People without an anchor—without God— are shaken to the foundations. Grief strikes us all with bitter arrows, but God’s people rest in hope, respond with courage, and live on by faith. God’s care for each of us is greater than the enemy’s hatred. Grieve when bad news comes, but don’t fear.

10:32-33 “Everyone therefore who acknowledges me before others, I also will acknowledge before my Father in heaven; but whoever denies me before others, I also will deny before my Father in heaven.”NRSV People have a clear choice. Everyone who acknowledges Jesus Christ (that is, publicly confesses faith in or declares allegiance to him) will be acknowledged by Christ before his Father in heaven. Jesus’ followers would face earthly courts of law where they would have to publicly claim to belong to Jesus Christ, usually at their peril (10:17-25). But for the disciple to acknowledge Jesus means that Jesus will claim that disciple as his own before the Father in heaven.

On the other hand, the person who denies their relationship to Jesus Christ would in turn face denial by Jesus before the Father.

These words refer to those whose true allegiance would be revealed under pressure. Jesus probably did not refer to those who formerly believed and fell away (for no profession of faith has been mentioned or implied). Matthew stressed the Last Judgment and the relationship between the Father and the Son. Jesus was making the astounding statement that each person’s standing before God is based on his or her relationship to Jesus Christ. Jesus is the advocate whose intercession before God will depend on one’s faithfulness in acknowledging him. It has never ceased to amaze me that we Christians have developed a kind of selective vision which allows us to be deeply and sincerely involved in worship and church activities and yet almost totally pagan in the day-in, day-out guts of our business lives . . . and never realize it.

Keith Miller

 

10:34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword.”NKJV The Jews believed that when the Messiah came, he would usher in a time of world peace. Jesus’ first arrival would not bring that universal peace. The very nature of Jesus’ claims forces people to make a choice. They must choose to believe who he said he is, or they must choose to reject him. Jesus did not come to bring peace but a sword (that is, “division”) that separates families, friends, and nations. Conflict and disagreement will arise between those who choose to follow Christ and those who do not. In saying this, Jesus was not encouraging disobedience to parents or conflict at home. Rather, he was showing that his presence demands a decision. Because some will follow Christ and some will not, conflict will inevitably arise. As his followers take their crosses and follow him, their different values, morals, goals, and purposes will set them apart. Do not neglect your family, but remember that your commitment to God is even more important than they are. God should be your first priority. Ironically, those who accept him do find inner peace because of their restored relationship with God. One day, however, there will be universal peace (Isaiah 9:5-7), for the Prince of Peace will resolve all conflict. For more on Jesus as peacemaker, see Zechariah 9:9-10; Matthew 5:9; John 14:27.

10:35-36 “For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household.”NRSV Jesus was quoting from Micah 7:6 (already alluded to in 10:21, see commentary above). In Micah, these divisive conditions led to a yearning for the Messiah; in this context they were caused by the Messiah’s coming. Jesus explained the response to his call—there will inevitably be conflict between those who respond and those who do not. Sometimes the reaction is violent, and angry family members become like foes. In the early church, Jews who became Christians were excommunicated from the synagogues and often shunned by their families. Even today, the road is difficult for Jews or Muslims who turn to Christianity. Their own family members become their worst enemies. Jesus did not come to make such divisions happen; instead, his coming, his words, and his call inevitably will cause conflict between those who accept him and those who reject him.

10:37 “Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.”NRSV Jesus did not force his followers to break family ties to follow him (as opposed to some present-day cults). Jesus was pointing out that his disciples must have singular loyalty to him. When discipleship conflicts with family loyalty, following Jesus must take the priority over natural love of family. If one must choose, one must take Jesus. Christ calls us to a higher mission than to find comfort and tranquillity in this life. Love of family is a law of God (see Ephesians 6:1-4; 1 Timothy 5:8), but even this love can be self-serving and used as an excuse not to serve God or do his work. We must not be so devoted or enmeshed in family love that we push Christ into the background.

10:38 “And whoever does not take up the cross and follow me is not worthy of me.”NRSV These words applied to the disciples and to all who want to be worthy of Jesus (“worthy” meaning willing to follow and serve, as in 10:11). To take up the cross was a vivid illustration of the humility and submission that Jesus asked of his followers. When Jesus used this picture of his followers taking up their crosses to follow him, the people knew what “taking up the cross” meant. Death on a cross was a form of execution used by the Roman Empire for dangerous criminals and political prisoners. A prisoner carried his own crossbar to the place of execution. Jesus’ followers faced social and political oppression and ostracism; yet he warned them against turning back. For some, taking up the cross might indeed mean death; for all, it means denying self. Jesus’ words meant that his followers had to obey God’s Word, spread the gospel, and follow his will, no matter what the results were for them personally. Soon after this, Jesus would take up his own cross. Jesus was speaking prophetically here as well. Jesus’ words became graphically clear after his crucifixion.

To follow Christ is a moment-by-moment decision, requiring denial of self and taking up one’s cross. Following Jesus does not mean walking behind him, but taking the same road of sacrifice and service that he took. The blessing for us is that he walks with us along the way.

10:39 “Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it.”NRSV This verse is a positive and negative statement of the same truth: Clinging to this life may cause us to forfeit the best from Christ in this world and in the next. The Christian life is a paradox: To attempt to find (or save) your life means only to lose it. The Greek word for “life” is psuche; it refers to the soul, the total person, the self, which includes the personality with all its dreams, hopes, and goals. A person who “finds” his or her life to satisfy desires and goals apart from God ultimately “loses” life. Not only does that person lose the eternal life offered only to those who believe and accept Christ as Savior, but he or she loses the fullness of life promised to those who believe.

By contrast, those who willingly “lose” their lives for the sake of Christ actually “find” them. They will receive great reward in God’s kingdom. To lose one’s life for Christ’s sake refers to a person refusing to renounce Christ, even if the punishment were death.

Jesus preached on this theme more often than we may wish to acknowledge:

  • “Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it” (Matthew 10:39 nrsv).
  • “For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it” (Matthew 16:25 nrsv).
  • “For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it” (Mark 8:35 nrsv).
  • “For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will save it” (Luke 9:24 nrsv).
  • “Those who try to make their life secure will lose it, but those who lose their life will keep it” (Luke 17:33 nrsv).
  • “Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life” (John 12:25 nrsv).

It would be easier to give one’s life in battle or in martyrdom than to do what Christ actually asks of us. Not only does Christ demand loyalty over family, he also demands loyalty over every part of our lives. The more we love this life’s rewards (leisure, power, popularity, financial security), the more we will discover how empty they really are. The best way to “find” life, therefore, is to loosen our greedy grasp on earthly rewards so that we can be free to follow Christ. We must risk pain, discomfort, conflict, and stress. We must acknowledge Christ’s claim over our destiny and our career. In doing so, we will inherit eternal life and begin at once to experience the benefits of following Christ.

 LIFE APPLICATION – PATH TO GREATNESS
The gospel takes us by surprise. We think we have life pretty well figured; then God upsets our schemes and shows us a better way.
Take your life, for example. Ambitious life goals are without a doubt one of the best aspirations a person can have—incentive, drive, challenge, direction. Then God announces, “Wrong! This is not my way!”
Without Christ, ambition is pointless and challenge misdirected. But a life surrendered to Christ gains eternal focus and divine incentive.
 Want to find your life? Put Jesus first, let his Word be your guiding light, and get close to others who know him well. Welcome to a new path to greatness!

10:40-42 “Whoever welcomes you welcomes me, and whoever welcomes me welcomes the one who sent me.”NRSV In 10:11-14, Jesus described how the disciples should go about their ministry—staying in homes of worthy people. Those who would welcome the disciples would receive great reward. The word “welcomes” may refer both to hospitality (receiving the messenger) as well as conversion (receiving the message). Jesus’ representatives carry all his authority. Those who welcome the disciples welcome Jesus; those who welcome Jesus welcome the one who sent Jesus—God the Father. Again Jesus unmistakably claims his relationship to God. Jesus spoke these words to his twelve disciples, but then repeated the saying three more times using prophets, righteous people, and little ones. “Whoever welcomes a prophet in the name of a prophet will receive a prophet’s reward; and whoever welcomes a righteous person in the name of a righteous person will receive the reward of the righteous; and whoever gives even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones in the name of a disciple—truly I tell you, none of these will lose their reward.”NRSV To give a cup of cold water was an important act of courtesy and hospitality. It would not be out of the ordinary and, therefore, would deserve no reward. The disciples definitely were “little ones” who were insignificant and despised in the eyes of the world. Those who would receive (welcome) the disciples merely because they were disciples would not lose their reward. Because the disciples would come with God’s authority, their acceptance by people would test the people’s attitudes toward God. It is that attitude that leads either to reward or loss of reward. For more on rewards, see Matthew 16:24-27; 19:28-30.

www.RidgeFellowship.com
Source:  Life Application Bible Commentary – Matthew.

Posted in Matthew | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Matthew Chapter 9

Gospel of Matthewmatthew-24-35Hello! I’m glad you are reading through Matthew with our church.  Today we read about Jesus healing a paralytic man and the calling of Matthew the tax collector as a disciple.  Jesus also teaches about fasting, raises a girl from the dead and heals a sick woman, two blind men and closes the chapter by teaching that “the harvest is plentiful but the workers are few.”

JESUS HEALS A PARALYZED MAN / 9:1-8

9:1 Jesus stepped into a boat, crossed over and came to his own town.NIV The events in 8:28-34 had occurred on the other side of the Sea of Galilee (Jesus and the disciples had gotten there by boat, 8:18, 23). The events Matthew placed at the end of chapter 8 and the beginning of chapter 9 are not in chronological sequence (see the Harmony of the Gospels at the end of this commentary). Matthew continued his story by placing Jesus back into a boat and crossing over the sea to return to his own town, Capernaum. This city became Jesus’ base of operations while he was in Galilee. This event may have occurred at Simon Peter’s house (8:14-17). Matthew may have been preserving his topical arrangement, keeping several of Jesus’ miracles together in this section.

Capernaum was a good choice for Jesus’ base of operations. It was a wealthy city due to fishing and trade. Situated on the Sea of Galilee in a densely populated area, Capernaum housed the Roman garrison that kept peace in the region. The city was a cultural melting pot, greatly influenced by Greek and Roman manners, dress, architecture, and politics.

9:2 Some men brought to him a paralytic, lying on a mat. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Take heart, son; your sins are forgiven.”NIV Some men, remembering that Jesus had healed many people in Capernaum on an earlier visit (8:14-17), brought a friend who needed Jesus’ help. The friend was a paralytic, and the men carried him, lying on a mat, to Jesus. The “mat” was like a stretcher that the men could carry.

Matthew’s Gospel explains how Jesus saw their faith. There was such a crowd gathered around the door to the house that these men carrying the man on the mat could not get through to the house. So they went up on the roof and took off enough tiles to lower their friend through the roof to Jesus below (Mark 2:1-4). Jesus “saw their faith” acted out in their determination. They knew that if they could just get near Jesus, Jesus could heal. Jesus referred to the faith of all the men who came but spoke only to the paralytic. Son (Greek, teknon) was simply a term of affection, used even with adults.

Matthew omitted some of the details of this story to focus on Jesus’ words that revealed a new aspect of his authority. Thus far, Matthew has shown Jesus’ authority in his teaching (7:28-29), in healing of diseases (8:1-17), over any other allegiance (8:18-22), over nature (8:23-27), and over demons (8:16, 28-34). In this miracle, Matthew showed Jesus’ authority to forgive sins.

Jesus said to the paralyzed man, “Take heart . . . your sins are forgiven.” Several verses in the Old Testament indicate that sickness and death result from humanity’s sinful condition (see, for example, Psalms 41:3-4; 103:2-3; and James 5:13-18 for the New Testament parallel). So God works forgiveness and healing together. That does not mean that we can measure a person’s spiritual health by looking at his or her physical health. But all sickness and death are the result of evil and sin. This man was paralyzed because of sin (in the world and in every human heart)—that was the root cause. Jesus spoke first to that condition. The man needed spiritual healing, so Jesus forgave his sins. Then Jesus healed the man. Both the man’s body and his spirit were paralyzed; he could not walk, and he was not yet one of Jesus’ disciples. But the man’s spiritual state was Jesus’ first concern. If God does not heal us or someone we love, we need to remember that physical healing is not Christ’s only concern. We will all be completely healed in Christ’s coming kingdom; but first we must become his disciples.

God offers the same forgiveness given to the paralytic to all who believe. The Greek word aphientai, translated “forgiven,” means to leave or let go, to give up a debt, to send away from oneself. When we say we have forgiven a person, we mean that we have renewed our relationship despite the wrong that the person did. But we cannot erase or change the act itself. But the notion of aphiemi goes far beyond our human forgiveness, for it includes the “putting away” of sin in two ways: (1) The law and justice are satisfied because Jesus paid the penalty that our sins deserved; thus, they can no longer be held against us. (2) The guilt caused by our sin is removed and replaced with Christ’s righteousness. We are so forgiven that, in God’s eyes, it is as if we had never sinned. If Jesus had done this and nothing more for the man, the man should have been satisfied. If Jesus had healed his body and had not dealt with his sinful condition, the man would have been ultimately worse.

 LIFE APPLICATION – TO BE FORGIVEN
Spiritual sickness is Jesus’ primary concern. He wants people to enjoy a right relationship with God—faithful discipleship, sturdy assurance of God’s love for them, freedom from spiritual oppression. So Jesus intentionally relieved the paralytic of the burden of his sins first, and then, second, of his physical paralysis.
When you think of the good things Jesus brings to you, thank him for forgiveness first of all. With sins forgiven, you are made right with God. With sins forgiven, your biggest problem— beyond your own skill to correct—has been solved. Jesus has become your Savior, the greatest gift of all. Bring others to Jesus, so they may experience his blessings upon their lives.

9:3 Then some of the scribes said to themselves, “This man is blaspheming.”NRSV These scribes (also called teachers of the law) were the legal specialists in Jesus’ day. Jesus’ teaching and popularity had led to special investigation by the powerful leaders of the Jewish faith. These scribes had come from Jerusalem to Capernaum (Luke 5:17). Jealous of Jesus’ popularity and power, these men hoped to find something to criticize or even condemn in Jesus’ teaching. When they heard Jesus tell the paralyzed man that his sins were forgiven, they were shocked. The people in Jesus’ day took blasphemy very seriously. Offenders died. Even an unproven accusation of blasphemy could prove life-threatening. In such a climate, the charge of blasphemy worked almost as well as a contract for murder. Blasphemy meant to curse, revile, or insult the name of God. Innocent persons could be accused, convicted, and killed without having a chance to defend themselves. In fact, the public cause of Jesus’ death was blasphemy. Those directly responsible for his execution wanted the charge posted: “This man said, I am King of the Jews” (John 19:21 nrsv).

The religious leaders hotly debated the offense of blasphemy in the first century. Some said that a person had to use the divine name to be accused. These scribes, however, took the assumption of divine prerogatives (forgiving sins) as also constituting blasphemy.

Therefore, because only God can forgive sins, Jesus was claiming to be God. In Jewish law, blasphemy was punishable by death (Leviticus 24:16). In labeling Jesus’ claim to forgive sins as blasphemous, the religious leaders showed they did not understand that Jesus was God. Jesus had God’s power and authority to heal bodies and forgive sins. Forgiveness of sins was a sign that the messianic age had come (Isaiah 40:2; Joel 2:32; Micah 7:18-19; Zechariah 13:1). Unfortunately, it did not occur to these Jewish leaders that perhaps this man was their Messiah.

9:4 But Jesus, perceiving their thoughts, said, “Why do you think evil in your hearts?”NRSV God is all-knowing, and Jesus is God. He had access to all the information; he knew every person’s thoughts (see 12:25; 22:18). Hebrews 4:13 says, “Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account” (niv). Jesus’ glory and divinity were veiled by his humanity and mortality. While Jesus walked as a human on this earth, he never ceased to be God. When Jesus was born, God became a man. Jesus was not part man and part God; he was completely human and completely divine. Jesus Christ is the perfect expression of God in human form. As a man, Jesus was subject to place, time, and other human limitations. He did not give up his eternal power when he became human, but he did set aside his glory and his rights. In response to the Father’s will, he limited his power and knowledge.

When Jesus became human, he restrained the full use of his powers, yet he could still see each person’s thoughts, intents, and motives. Jesus perceived the thoughts of these scribes, who were accusing him of blasphemy. Jesus may have read their minds, or he may have read the questions in the expressions on their faces. In any case, they could not hide their hostility at Jesus’ words. Their thoughts of Jesus as a blasphemer were evil.

 LIFE APPLICATION – DEALING WITH SKEPTICS
When people dust off your witness, dismiss you as a fanatic, or quickly change the conversation from faith to furniture, you might feel offended. “Forget them!” you might say. “Hopeless!”
Jesus’ response to skeptics was to engage them. His question showed that he was interested in them. Even though they were often severely accusatory, Jesus kept talking to them. He did not write them off. Sincere questions have a way of keeping a conversation going.
In your witness, don’t be discouraged by skeptics. Just show compassion as Jesus did, and keep the conversation open, honest, and friendly.

9:5 “For which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Stand up and walk’?”NRSV It would take someone of great power and authority to forgive sins. Yet the statement concerning forgiveness of sins could be said without verification. Healing the paralyzed man would be open to immediate public verification. Jesus was offering to do an easier task (healing the man) as public evidence that the more difficult, “secret” task was also accomplished. The scribes understood sickness to be the result of sin. Jesus then proposed the converse—if he could heal a person, then could he not also forgive sins? Jesus wanted to show that he had the power to forgive sins by showing that he had the power to make a paralytic stand up and walk.

Jesus accepted the premise that words matter. He repeatedly made claims that were outrageous, arrogant, and deceptive unless absolutely true. But he backed up his words with his work. He rested his claim to be God on his statements and actions. Confronted with undeniable evidence, people still refused to believe.

Unfortunately, people today reject Jesus with practically no evidence. Sometimes, we are so worried about presenting ourselves as Christians that we fail to present Jesus himself to those around us. We should seek to gain a hearing. But when we have their attention, our subject ought to be Jesus. When people actually find out what he did and said, they will have a clearer reason to respond to the invitation to believe. They may still reject Jesus. But they won’t be able to say to us, “You never told me.”

 LIFE APPLICATION – BACKUPS
It’s easy to tell someone his sins are forgiven; it’s a lot more difficult to reverse a case of paralysis! Jesus backed up his words by healing the man’s legs. Jesus’ action showed that his words were true; he had the power to forgive as well as to heal. Talk is cheap; our words lack meaning if our actions do not back them up. We can say we love God or others, but if we are not taking practical steps to demonstrate that love, our words are empty and meaningless. How well do your actions back up what you say?

9:6-7 “But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins”—he then said to the paralytic—”Stand up, take your bed and go to your home.” And he stood up and went to his home.NRSV Jesus again used the term “Son of Man” (an Old Testament name for the Messiah), a favorite designation for himself (alluding to Daniel 7:13; see also Matthew 8:20). The name claimed authority, for only one of highest authority (God himself) could forgive sins. The use of the title also reveals that Jesus was anticipating his future role as Judge. Only here and in Luke 7:48 does Jesus talk about forgiving sins. He came to do just that (Matthew 1:21), and his death would make forgiveness available to all people. But with those whom Jesus met and touched, he also had the authority to forgive their sins when he perceived that they would understand and accept.

Jesus’ authority extended from spiritual healing to physical healing. The physical healings revealed this to the world. One who could heal a paralytic could also forgive sins. Jesus spoke to the doubtful scribes, so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins. But Jesus didn’t even finish his sentence. He broke off part of the way through and allowed the miracle to speak for itself.

Jesus spoke with commanding authority, showing that he expected immediate obedience. He said to the paralytic—”Stand up, take your bed and go to your home.” Jesus told the paralytic to stand up on his previously useless legs, to take his mat with arms that may also have been previously useless, and to go home. Jesus’ mission was to preach the gospel. His great power served to reveal his authority. Thus, Jesus sent the man back to his home with a new life because he had forgiven the man of his sins. The man did as Jesus said. He stood up and went to his home.

The healing unmistakably revealed Jesus’ power and authority. The scribes who questioned Jesus’ ability to forgive sins (9:3) saw the formerly paralyzed man get up and walk. Jesus’ question in 9:5 forced their answer: Jesus had the power to make the paralyzed man walk; thus, he also had the authority to forgive his sins.

9:8 When the crowd saw this, they were filled with awe; and they praised God, who had given such authority to men.NIV Jesus did this miracle in front of the crowd that had gathered in this home to hear Jesus speak (Mark 2:2). The phrase “they were filled with awe” implies amazement as well as fear. Such fear was appropriate in the presence of one who displayed such authority (that is, authority to forgive sins). What was the result of this awe? The people praised God. While the scribes had previously called Jesus a blasphemer, the people recognized God’s power and realized that Jesus had authority from God. (Matthew does not tell us if some of the scribes changed their minds.) The difference between the scribes’ rejection and the crowd’s awe is a major theme in Matthew (see 9:33-34; 12:13-15; 14:34-15:2; 15:29-31 compared to 16:1-4). That God had given such authority to men probably means that the people were recognizing that a man—Jesus—displayed God’s power.

JESUS EATS WITH SINNERS AT MATTHEW’S HOUSE / 9:9-13

9:9 As Jesus went on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax collector’s booth. “Follow me,” he told him, and Matthew got up and followed him.NIV Matthew (the author of this Gospel) was a Jew who worked for the Romans (specifically for Herod Antipas) as the area’s tax collector. (In Mark and Luke, he is called “Levi.” Most people in this day had two or three names: a Jewish name, a Roman name, and possibly a Greek name. Levi was his Jewish name, Matthew his Roman name.) He collected custom duties from the citizens as well as from merchants passing through town. (Capernaum was a customs post on the caravan route between Damascus to the northeast and the Mediterranean Sea to the west.) Tax collectors took a commission on the taxes they collected, so most of them overcharged and kept the profits. Thus, most Jews hated tax collectors because of their reputation for cheating, their support of Rome, and their constant contact with “unclean” Gentiles. A Jew who accepted such an office shamed his family and friends and was excommunicated from the synagogue.

The tax collector’s booth was an elevated platform or bench. Everyone knew who Matthew was, and anyone passing through the city who had to pay taxes could find him easily. Matthew’s tollbooth taxed commercial goods being transported from the sea to land routes (his booth was “by the sea,” Mark 2:13-14 nkjv). This would not have been the first time that Jesus had seen Matthew, for Jesus had often walked along the shore of the Sea of Galilee. Apparently Jesus saw in Matthew what he could use in his ministry. For example, we can see Matthew’s attention to detail and careful record-keeping skills in the way that he wrote this Gospel. Certainly Matthew had seen Jesus before and, with the crowds, probably had been impressed and intrigued with this man.

Then one day Jesus walked right up to Matthew’s booth and said two simple words: “Follow me.” The words are in the imperative mood, meaning this was a command, a call to discipleship, not an invitation (see 4:19; 8:22; 9:9; 10:38; 16:24; 19:21). Jesus called Matthew to “follow”—that is, to walk the same road. That Jesus called such a notorious person into his circle of disciples certainly must have shocked the other disciples, as well as the trailing crowd. Following upon the discussion of Jesus’ ability to forgive sins (9:1-8), this episode dramatically demonstrated the range of sinners that Jesus could and would forgive.

Matthew recognized that Jesus was not inviting him; Jesus was calling him. So Matthew got up and followed him. Matthew’s radical obedience would cause a great change in his life. Already ostracized by fellow Jews, Matthew’s decision to follow Jesus would make no difference in this regard. But Matthew was probably very wealthy—tax collecting was a lucrative occupation; so when Matthew walked away from his booth, he snubbed Rome and a lifetime of potentially great wealth. Several of the other disciples could always return to fishing, but Matthew could never turn back.

 LIFE APPLICATION – GET UP AND GO
When Jesus called Matthew to be one of his disciples, Matthew got up and followed, leaving a promising career and a wealthy lifestyle. When God calls you to follow or obey him, do you do it with as much abandon as Matthew did? Sometimes the decision to follow Christ requires difficult or painful choices. Like Matthew, we must decide to leave behind those things that would keep us from following Christ.

9:10 While Jesus was having dinner at Matthew’s house, many tax collectors and “sinners” came and ate with him and his disciples.NIV Matthew responded as Jesus would want all his followers to do—he followed his Lord immediately, and he called his friends together to meet Jesus too. Matthew held a dinner for his fellow tax collectors and other notorious sinners so they also could meet Jesus. Matthew, who left behind a material fortune to gain a spiritual fortune, was proud to be associated with Jesus.

At Matthew’s house there gathered a crowd that Jesus could not reach in the synagogues. The tax collectors had been excommunicated. The term “sinners” referred not only to immoral and pagan people, but also to the common people who were not learned in the law and did not abide by the rigid standards of the Pharisees. The Pharisees regarded these people as wicked and opposed to the will of God because they did not observe the rituals for purity, which enabled them to eat with others. These people gathered at Levi’s house, where they knew they had a welcome, and they ate with [Jesus] and his disciples and listened to the message this marvelous teacher had for them. As portrayed in the call of Matthew, this message may have been that in the kingdom of heaven the distinctions between people break down.

9:11 When the Pharisees saw this, they said to his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?”NRSV According to the Pharisees, contact with these tax collectors and sinners made a Jew unclean; to sit and eat with such people was particularly heinous. Sharing fellowship around a meal indicated close association and identification with that person. The Pharisees would have nothing to do with such people, expecting them to change before dealing with them. But not so with Jesus.

The Pharisees were the legal specialists of the time. They interpreted the law but were especially concerned about the “rules” for life that became as binding as God’s written law in the Torah. Their job was to teach the Scriptures and the Law and to protect them against anyone’s willful defiance. They saw themselves as righteous and everyone else as sinners.

Then along came this man, Jesus, who was popular, taught with great authority from the Scriptures, and claimed to speak for God himself. Yet, he also ignored their laws and seemed to condone sin by keeping company with sinners. They watched Jesus and followed his every move, and their anger continued to boil as he flouted their man-made rules, which they often elevated above the laws of God (see, for example, 15:1-20).

The Pharisees, so strict in their observance of their laws as they attempted to retain their “purity,” refused to eat with common people because the sins of the commoners might make them ceremonially impure. So it surprised the Pharisees when Jesus sat down to a meal with these tax collectors and sinners. Here was a man who seemed to have the entire law at his fingertips, who taught with great authority, yet who stooped to the level of the poor, unlearned, common people—even sinners! Thus, the Pharisees pulled his disciples aside and asked why Jesus did this. They fashioned their question as an accusation. In this instance, Jesus probably stepped on every Pharisaic regulation about eating—and the Pharisees were not happy about it!

LIFE APPLICATION – SEPARATISM
The Pharisees were noted for their separatism. Today, separatism promotes the idea that Christians should show the world the value of the gospel by being “separate” from the world—that is, don’t mix, don’t adopt the world’s bad habits (smoking, drinking, playing cards, going to movies, and dancing have all been on various churches’ lists of no-no’s). Some churches have expanded the idea of separatism to include keeping apart from anyone (including other Christians) who are not as “separate” as they should be. (For example, in the 1950s some white Protestant churches refused to associate with Billy Graham when Catholic and black church leaders first appeared on the evangelist’s podium.)
This story teaches us to be very careful of separatism. True, Christian disciples are called to a different lifestyle. But it’s wrong to think that we witness to Jesus’ gospel when we refuse to associate with people who don’t believe, or believe in ways not quite to our preferences. In fact, the disciple who sits in a tavern with a friend, or goes to the office party, would appear to be more like Jesus than the one who righteously stays away. Don’t be afraid to reach out to people who sin; God’s message can change anyone.

9:12-13 When Jesus heard that, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice.’ For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”NKJV The Pharisees’ question apparently made its way to Jesus’ ears, and Jesus had an answer for the self-righteous, influential religious leaders. The first part of Jesus’ answer was from a common proverb on the healthy and the sick. Those who are well do not seek out a physician; the

physician’s waiting room is filled with those who are sick. They recognize their need and come to the one who can make them well. The physician, in turn, spends his time helping the sick get well. Mere outward correctness and attention to forms and ceremonies will not do. God must have reality.

Harry A. Ironsides

 

Jesus then told these self-righteous Pharisees to go and learn what this means, implying that they did not understand their own Scriptures. Rabbis said, “Go and learn,” to students who did not understand or apply correctly God’s Word and needed to go back and study more. The Pharisees thought they knew Scripture perfectly; Jesus told them to go back and study again the words of God spoken through the prophet Hosea, I desire mercy and not sacrifice (Hosea 6:6). Hosea’s words were not a blanket condemnation of the sacrificial system of the Jewish nation at the time; rather, God was condemning a thoughtless, mechanical approach to sacrifice. A religious ritual helps when carried out with an attitude of love for God. If a person’s heart is far from God, ritual will become empty mockery. God did not want the Israelites’ rituals; he wanted their hearts. Jesus challenged the Pharisees to apply Hosea’s words to themselves. The Pharisees’ rigid guidelines had created an artificial distinction between the “righteous” and “sinners.” As a result, the religious leaders, who should have guided and taught the people, had instead separated themselves. Thus, the “worship” of the religious leaders was as empty as a sacrifice given without thought of God. God wants a heart attitude that includes a right relationship with him and with others, an attitude that reaches out to those in physical and spiritual need.

Jesus carried the proverb a step further and explained his messianic mission. “I am here because these are the people who realize their need and welcome me.” Jesus did not come to call the righteous (used ironically—those, like these Pharisees, who thought they were righteous) to repentance, for the self-righteous do not recognize their sinfulness. But these sinners saw their need. This was Jesus’ audience. Jesus, the Great Physician, healed people of physical illnesses, but he knew that all people are spiritually sick and in need of salvation. Luke recorded Jesus’ words about his mission as, “For the Son of Man came to seek out and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10 nrsv).

 LIFE APPLICATION – THOUGHTLESS WORSHIP AND WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE
Perhaps the greater proof of Matthew’s conversion wasn’t his willingness to follow Jesus but his immediate invitation to others to also meet the Lord. The people each of us tries to reach with the gospel usually have limits and boundaries. Most often, these limits are self-imposed. Like the Pharisees, we may conclude that a person’s reputation or past behavior cuts him or her off from even the opportunity to meet Christ. If so, we are wrong. People still need to hear. The gospel gets compromised more often by our failure to express it than by our failure to express it in the “right context.” Is your approach to non-Christians more like Matthew’s or like the Pharisees’? Invite someone outside your “world” into your home or church.

RELIGIOUS LEADERS ASK JESUS ABOUT FASTING / 9:14-17

The Pharisees questioned Jesus about those with whom he had fellowship at meals. They also questioned why Jesus and his disciples feasted instead of fasting on the customary days. Jesus showed the need for joy because the Messiah had come.

9:14 Then the disciples of John came to him, saying, “Why do we and the Pharisees fast often, but your disciples do not fast?”NRSV The disciples of John were the remaining disciples of John the Baptist, a group that lasted into the second century (see Acts 19:1-9). These men and the Pharisees were fasting—that is, they were going without food in order to spend time in prayer, repenting and humbling themselves before God. The Old Testament Law set aside only one day a year as a required day of fasting for all Jews—the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:29). The Pharisees, however, fasted on Mondays and Thursdays (see Luke 18:12) as an act of piety, and most likely they promoted this among the people.

The tense of the verb for “fast” indicates that the feast at Matthew’s house happened at the very time that these people were fasting, apparently on one of the weekly fasting days. John’s disciples fasted as a sign of mourning for sin and to prepare themselves for the Messiah’s coming. John the Baptist was in prison, and these disciples found themselves siding with the Pharisees on this issue; they were fasting when they should have been feasting with Jesus. Naturally this caused a question: Why do we and the Pharisees fast often, but your disciples do not fast?

9:15 And Jesus said to them, “The wedding guests cannot mourn as long as the bridegroom is with them, can they? The days will come when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast.”NRSV In the Bible, people would fast in times of disaster and as a sign of their humility and repentance. Fasting represented mourning. During that time, the people approached God with humility and sorrow for sin. Fasting focused their attention on God and demonstrated their change of heart and their true devotion (see, for example, Judges 20:26; 1 Kings 21:27; Ezra 8:21; Joel 1:14; Jonah 3:5). While Jesus walked the earth, his presence was a cause for celebration—the Messiah had come! The people did not need to mourn; they needed to rejoice. Jesus’ presence was as joyous as the presence of the bridegroom at a wedding feast. The picture of Jesus as a “bridegroom” comes from the Old Testament description of the wedding feast that God will prepare for himself and his people (Isaiah 54:5-6; Hosea 2:16-20). Wedding guests do not mourn or fast; a wedding is a time of celebration and feasting. Likewise, Jesus’ coming was a sign of celebration, not mourning and fasting. Jesus did not condemn fasting—he himself fasted (Luke 4:2). He emphasized that fasting must be done at the right time for the right reasons.

Jesus knew, however, that soon he (the bridegroom) would be taken away from them. The Greek word translated “taken away from” is aparthe; a similar verb is used in the Septuagint (a Greek translation of the Old Testament) in Isaiah 53:8, a verse prophesying the Messiah’s violent death. “The days [that] will come” refers to the days of Jesus’ crucifixion and death. Jesus’ disciples would indeed fast and mourn during those days. John 16:20 says, “You will weep and mourn while the world rejoices. You will grieve, but your grief will turn to joy” (niv). The disciples would grieve for their crucified Master, and the world (the mass of people opposed to Jesus) would rejoice. But the disciples’ grief would not last long; their sorrow would turn to joy when they saw their risen Lord.

 LIFE APPLICATION – CELEBRATE!
When you gather to worship, count it all joy. Jesus is with you there, and where he is, let no one be droopy or melancholy. Severe religion wants people to be excessively sober, serious, and quiet. But Jesus invites us to worship happily, cheerfully, with an enthusiasm that accompanies the reunion of best friends. Let your worship be like a wedding celebration.

9:16 “No one sews a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old cloak, for the patch pulls away from the cloak, and a worse tear is made.”NRSV There are several interpretations of the “old versus the new” (see 9:17 which speaks of the “new wineskins” and the “new wine”):

  • Law versus grace. The old cloth and old wineskins represent people under the Old Testament Law, and the new cloth and new wineskins represent people under grace. This view, preserved by dispensationalists, stresses the complete break of the Old Testament view of obedience with the New Testament.
  • Old covenant versus new covenant. The old cloth and old wineskins represent the older and partial understanding of God’s will that had only a glimmer of understanding of God’s grace as exemplified in the gospel. The new covenant would reflect a new way of understanding what true faithfulness to the law would be under Christ’s authority. This view does justice to “so both are preserved” (9:17) because it sees the revealed will of God as present in both old and new. But limiting Jesus’ words to apply to time in history alone misses his point.
  • Old system of spirituality versus new system. This view sees continuity in the revealed will of God, both in the Old Testament Scripture and in the New Testament message of Christ. The old cloth and wineskins referred to the old system of application of the law (rigid, legalistic) as typified by the worst teaching of the Pharisees. The old forms and traditions were characterized by the sorrow of fasting. The new attitude of spirituality is characterized by the joy of feasting as seen in Christ and his disciples. New attitudes and methods would be needed. When new attitudes are present, both the understanding of the will of God in Scripture and the new forms will be preserved.

Jesus’ arrival on earth ushered in a new time, a new covenant between God and people. The new covenant called for a new way of expressing personal faith. The newness of the gospel could not be combined with the legalism of the Pharisees any more than a piece of unshrunk cloth should be used as a patch on an old cloak. When the garment is washed, the patch will shrink, pull away from the old garment, and leave a worse tear than before.

The Christian church was never meant to be a sect or adaptation of Judaism; rather, Christ fulfills the intent of the Old Testament Scripture. The Jews, patiently waiting for their Messiah, should have recognized Jesus as the Messiah and should have believed the Good News. The apostle John wrote, “The law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:17 nkjv). Both law and grace express God’s nature. Moses’ law emphasized God’s law and justice; Jesus Christ came to express God’s mercy, love, and forgiveness. Moses could only give the law; Christ came to fulfill the law perfectly (5:17). The law reveals the nature and will of God; Jesus Christ reveals the nature and will of God. But while the law could only point out sin and condemn us, Jesus Christ gave his life to bring us forgiveness of sin and salvation. The parables of the cloth and the wineskins (9:17) apply to more than just fasting or to the Pharisees. They speak of Jesus’ entire mission and the new era he inaugurated by his entrance into human history.

9:17 “Neither is new wine put into old wineskins; otherwise, the skins burst, and the wine is spilled, and the skins are destroyed; but new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved.”NRSV In Bible times, people stored wine in goatskins sewn around the edges to form watertight bags (called wineskins). New wine expanded as it fermented, stretching its wineskin. After this wine had aged, old and brittle wineskins would burst if fresh wine was poured into them. New wine, therefore, would always be put into fresh wineskins. The new wine was the newness of the gospel as exemplified in the person of Jesus Christ (John 2:1-11). Like old wineskins, the Pharisees and indeed the entire religious system of Judaism had become too rigid to accept Jesus. They could not contain him or his message in their traditions or rules. Their understanding of faithfulness to the law had become unsuitable for the fresh, dynamic power of Christ’s message. They were the self-appointed guardians of the “old cloak” and the “old wineskins.”

Jesus did not come to abolish or annul the Law and the Prophets but to fulfill them (5:17). But this fulfillment required new approaches and new structures. Jesus’ words and so both are preserved, reveal that the new wine needed to be preserved in new forms. The new way of obedience to the law would be found in the authoritative teaching of Jesus. Jesus did not come to patch up the old religious system of Judaism with its rules and traditions. If he had, his message would have damaged it. His purpose was to bring in something new, though God’s prophets had told about it centuries before. This new message said that God’s Son would come to earth to offer all people forgiveness of sins and reconciliation. The gospel did not fit into the rigid legalistic system that had become the Jewish religion.

LIFE APPLICATION – FULFILLED WINESKINS
Jesus repeatedly challenged the thought of the day that moved from timeless truth to wooden, thoughtless practice. He pointed out that a rigid application often contradicts the original truth from which it came. He openly charged people with rejecting God’s Word by substituting tradition for truth.
In the present context, Jesus was using the cloth and wineskin illustrations to roll back worn-out applications. Jesus didn’t reject fasting; he rejected fasting without purpose and fasting for the wrong reasons. We must ensure that our attitudes and methods for ministry convey the same commitment to the eternal truth of God’s Word but portray flexibility in how we communicate it. Are we locked into worn-out traditions for worship and ministry? Are we open to fresh new ways to bring Christ to the world?

JESUS HEALS A BLEEDING WOMAN AND RESTORES A GIRL TO LIFE / 9:18-26

In this new kingdom, joy predominates (9:15) and love in action takes the place of rigid law keeping. Matthew followed the previous account of Jesus’ words to the questioning Pharisees and disciples of John the Baptist with the account of Jesus reaching out to two more unclean people—a woman with a bleeding disorder and a dead child—healing one and raising the other to life. His compassion outweighed legalism.

9:18-19 While he was saying these things to them, suddenly a leader of the synagogue came in and knelt before him, saying, “My daughter has just died; but come and lay your hand on her, and she will live.” And Jesus got up and followed him, with his disciples.NRSV Jesus was interrupted at his meal by a man who came with a need. Mark and Luke say this man’s name was Jairus (Mark 5:22; Luke 8:41). He was a leader of the synagogue. The synagogue was the local center of worship, and Jairus was a lay person elected as one of the leaders (a synagogue could have more than one leader or ruler, see Acts 13:15). The synagogue leaders were responsible for supervising worship services, caring for the scrolls, running the daily school, keeping the congregation faithful to the Law, distributing alms, administering the care of the building, and finding rabbis to teach on the Sabbath. The leader of the local synagogue exerted great influence in his community, yet he knelt before Jesus, indicating homage and courtesy as he came with his urgent request. Neither position nor pressure could stop Jairus from coming to the one man who could help his daughter. (Mark and Luke add that she was twelve years old—see Mark 5:42 and Luke 8:42; Luke also adds that this was his only daughter.)

Matthew abbreviated this story by quoting the father as saying, “My daughter has just died.” In Mark’s account, we read that the daughter was dying, but while Jesus was on the way, news came that the little girl had died. Matthew intended to stress Jesus’ authority over death, so he shortened the story, retaining Jesus’ words and focusing on his power.

While Jesus could have healed (or raised) this young girl by speaking the word (as he had done with the centurion’s servant, 8:5-13), that was not Jairus’s request. Still, Jesus responded to his faith. Jesus apparently heard the urgency in Jairus’s voice and saw the strain of worry on his face, so he got up and followed him, with his disciples. Mark adds that there was also a large crowd who went along. Thus, so many people filled the streets that they pressed around Jesus (Mark 5:24).

 LIFE APPLICATION – AN EQUALIZING NEED
Shock and grief made the synagogue leader bold. A long series of disappointments had created a similar result in the suffering woman. The first came to Jesus for his child’s life; the second came to Jesus to make her whole. The ruler couldn’t bear to lose his twelve-year-old child, while the woman couldn’t wait to lose her twelve-year-old problem. They were two of many people driven to Jesus by their needs.
Jesus met people in their need. His response was neither calculated nor mechanical. He never ignored people because of their status or position. He clearly wanted people to acknowledge his lordship, but he willingly helped them with no assurance of their gratitude or understanding.
We imitate Christ when we help people any way we can while also offering them the gospel. We must do so lovingly and generously, even if they do not respond to the message.

9:20-21 Just then a woman who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak. She said to herself, “If I only touch his cloak, I will be healed.”NIV In the crowd pressing on Jesus was another desperate person in need of divine help. A woman had been subject to bleeding for twelve years. This bleeding was painful and may have been a menstrual or uterine disorder. She had been to many doctors, had spent all her money, but had received no cure (Mark 5:26). The bleeding caused the woman to be in a constant condition of ceremonial uncleanness (see Leviticus 15:25-33). She could not worship in the synagogue, and she could not have normal social relationships, for under Jewish law, anyone who touched her also became unclean. Thus, the woman had been treated almost as severely as a leper.

In these two stories we find two people who sought Jesus out—Jairus on behalf of his daughter, and this woman for her incurable disease. Both came in faith, knowing that Jesus could take care of their particular problem. Jairus had already petitioned Jesus, and Jesus was on his way. This woman had heard about Jesus’ miracle-working power (apparently for the first time) and had come to Capernaum to find him (tradition says she was from Caesarea Philippi). She worked her way through the crowd and came up behind Jesus. She believed that she only had to touch the edge of his cloak (the tassels) and she would be healed. Tassels were attached to the outer garment to remind Jews to follow God (Numbers 15:37-38; Deuteronomy 22:12). The effort to touch Jesus’ garment was due to the popular belief that the clothes of a holy man imparted spiritual and healing power (see Mark 6:56; Acts 19:11-12). She may have feared that Jesus would not touch her if he knew her condition, that Jesus would not risk becoming unclean in order to heal her. Or she may have feared that if her disease became known to the crowd, the people who had touched her would be angry at having become unclean unknowingly. The woman knew she could receive healing, but she tried to do it as unobtrusively as possible. She thought that she would just be healed and go away.

LIFE APPLICATION – TOUCHING HIM
Lots of people were touching Jesus that day, bumping against him, reaching out to shake his hand (or the equivalent), moving alongside the crowd. But one person touched him in faith. That person discovered Jesus’ healing power.
Mere curiosity, merely following the crowd, or casually brushing up against Jesus does not represent the faith Jesus looks for, the faith he responds to. The woman was desperate; she believed Jesus could help; and she was determined, even if a bit bashful. We follow her example when we truly lay our needs before Jesus in prayer, believing he can help us. Do that today with your worries and cares. Divine help will be there for you.

9:22 Jesus turned, and seeing her he said, “Take heart, daughter; your faith has made you well.” And instantly the woman was made well.NRSV Mark describes in detail the process of this healing (Mark 5:25-34) and places the healing before Jesus’ words to the woman. Characteristically, Matthew was focusing instead on Jesus’ authoritative words. Someone had touched him in order to be healed. Clearly Jesus healed the woman; her faith appropriated the healing, and Jesus perceived what had happened. He turned, saw the woman who had been healed (in Mark he asked who had touched him, but he already knew). Then he spoke words of comfort to the woman, “Take heart, daughter; your faith has made you well.” Jesus spoke to the woman in gentle words, calling her daughter, revealing a father-child relationship. She came for healing and received it, but she also received peace and a relationship with God himself because of her faith. Jesus explained that it was not his clothing that had healed her; rather, her faith in reaching out to the one person who could heal her had allowed that healing to take place. Not only did she have faith, but she had also placed her faith in the right person. She was instantly delivered from her bleeding and her pain.

 LIFE APPLICATION – NEVER GIVE UP
God changed a situation that had been a problem for years. Like the leper and the demon-possessed men, this diseased woman was considered unclean. For twelve years, she too had been one of the “untouchables” and had not been able to lead a normal life. But Jesus changed that and restored her. Sometimes we are tempted to give up on people or situations that have not changed for many years. God can change what seems unchangeable, giving new purpose and hope.

9:23-24 When Jesus came to the leader’s house and saw the flute players and the crowd making a commotion, he said, “Go away; for the girl is not dead but sleeping.” And they laughed at him.NRSV Mark explains that messengers then arrived to tell Jairus that his daughter had died. But this did not stop Jesus. He took Peter, James, and John and continued on to the leader’s house. The flute players and the commotion (loud crying and wailing) were all part of the customary ritual of mourning. Lack of weeping and wailing was the ultimate disgrace and disrespect. Some people, usually women, made mourning a profession and were paid by the dead person’s family to weep over the body. Jairus, the leader of the synagogue, was an important person in the town. Thus, at the death of his only daughter, the townspeople demonstrated their great love and respect for Jairus and his family by weeping and wailing.

Jesus spoke words of encouragement, only to be laughed at. His words, the girl is not dead but sleeping, probably made Jesus appear rather stupid—certainly anyone could tell death from sleep. Neither was she just in a coma from which Jesus would awaken her as some have proposed. The girl was indeed dead, and everyone from the family to the mourners knew it. Jesus knew it too, but his words tested the faith of the crowd and revealed to Jairus the hope beyond all hope of what Jesus was about to do. She was dead, but Jesus would bring her back to life, as if awakening her from sleep. Jesus used the image of sleep to indicate that the girl’s condition was temporary and that she would be restored. Luke explained that when Jesus lifted her up, her spirit returned to her (Luke 8:54-55).

9:25-26 But when the crowd was put outside, He went in and took her by the hand, and the girl arose. And the report of this went out into all that land.NKJV Jesus’ words sounded ridiculous to the faithless crowd. Their laughter became their judgment—they would not witness the miracle, for Jesus put them all outside of the room. Then Jesus took the child’s father and mother and the three disciples who had come and went in where the child was, in an inner part of the house. Jesus had come to earth to conquer sin and death, and in this dramatic but quiet miracle, he would show his disciples that power. And two bereaved parents would receive back their beloved daughter.

Jesus did no incantations and spoke no magic words, as other healers of the day normally did. He simply went to the girl’s bedside and took her by the hand. The fact that Jesus touched the girl’s hand would have amazed the proper synagogue leader and the disciples. Touching a dead body meant to become unclean. But Jesus had already dealt with a demon-possessed man and a woman with an incurable issue of blood and had touched and healed them. Touching the dead girl confirmed once again that to Jesus, compassion was more important than the letter of the law.

Jesus took the girl’s hand in his, he issued a command (Mark 5:41), and the dead child arose. Just as the healings Jesus performed were always complete, so the rising of this young girl from the dead was complete.

This was not the first time the disciples had witnessed the raising of a dead person. Luke 7:11-15 records Jesus raising a boy near the village of Nain. Yet, even in this instance, the disciples were amazed. When the girl came back to life, perhaps the disciples may have wondered (as they did after Jesus calmed the storm), “Who then is this, that the dead can be brought back to life?” Jesus would raise yet another person—his friend Lazarus (dead and buried for four days—recorded in John 11). Then finally, most dramatic of all, Jesus himself would rise from the grave and spend time with the disciples before returning to his Father. Jesus had authority and power over humanity’s greatest enemy—death.

Mark explained that Jesus had commanded the parents not to advertise the miracle (Mark 5:43). However, despite Jesus’ command to the contrary, the report of this went out into all that land.

 LIFE APPLICATION – HOPE
It’s terrific to heal, preach, feed, and help people, but still there lingers death as our last and greatest enemy. Here Jesus shows his power over that problem too.
“What is your only hope in life and in death?” asks the first question of the Heidelberg Catechism. “That I am not my own, but belong—body and soul, in life and in death—to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ.”
When you approach death, be confident in Jesus’ saving power. When loved ones die, treasure the hope of eternal life. Jesus’ power will surely carry us through that last portal to our home in heaven.

JESUS HEALS THE BLIND AND MUTE / 9:27-34

9:27 As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed him, crying loudly, “Have mercy on us, Son of David!”NRSV Jesus and the disciples returned from there (that is, from Jairus’s house, 9:23), most likely with a crowd continuing in their wake. Two blind men also followed him. These men cried out for mercy, meaning that they wanted Jesus to help them. Isaiah had prophesied that a day would come when God would open the eyes of the blind (Isaiah 29:18; 35:5-6; 42:7). These men called Jesus Son of David, a popular way of addressing Jesus as the Messiah. It was known that the Messiah would be a descendant of David (Isaiah 9:7). This is the first time this title is used in Matthew.

9:28 When he had gone indoors, the blind men came to him, and he asked them, “Do you believe that I am able to do this?” “Yes, Lord,” they replied.NIV Jesus didn’t respond immediately to the blind men’s pleas, but they persisted, following Jesus indoors, right into the house where Jesus was staying. They knew Jesus could heal them, and they brought their request to him.

The focus of this story is the power of faith. Jesus asked these blind men first if they had faith (Do you believe . . . ?). Then he healed them according to their faith (9:29). These men answered Jesus’ question about their belief, saying, “Yes, Lord.” The use of the word “Lord” reveals their faith in Jesus’ power and authority to heal them.

 LIFE APPLICATION – “YES, LORD”
How simple and profound. The blind men showed their faith in plain talk that says, “Yes, Lord, you can do it!”
The “Amen” that closes our prayers is like saying “Yes, Lord.” “Amen” is not just a period at the end of a sentence, or a courtesy closing at the end of a letter. It is our vote of confidence that Jesus, our Lord, can do it. Let your Amen be as strong and simple, direct and plain, as if you had followed Jesus into the house and asked him for help, person to person. Occasionally, to help remind you of its meaning, say at the end of your prayers, “Yes, Lord, you can do it!”

9:29-31 Then he touched their eyes and said, “According to your faith let it be done to you.” And their eyes were opened.NRSV These blind men had proven their faith in Jesus to heal them by coming to him with their need and following him right into a house in order to receive healing. Because these men believed, Jesus touched their eyes and their eyes were opened. The words “according to your faith” do not mean “in proportion to,” but “in response to.” This healing was a powerful example that Jesus was the Messiah. Healing of the blind had never occurred in the Old Testament or in Judaism before Jesus.

Then Jesus sternly ordered them, “See that no one knows of this.”NRSV Jesus told these men to be quiet because he was concerned for his ministry. Jesus did not want to be known as just a miracle worker; he wanted people to listen to his words that would heal their broken spiritual lives. Jesus’ mission was to preach the Good News of the kingdom of God. If crowds descended on him to see amazing healings and dead people raised, they would not be coming with the heart attitude needed to hear and respond to the gospel. The disciples would understand Jesus’ miracles and talk about them after his resurrection—then they could write them down for all of us to read and marvel at as well. But these blind men were too excited to heed Jesus’ words. Jesus had sternly ordered them to keep quiet but they went away and spread the news about him throughout that district.NRSV Obviously the blind men would not be able to hide their healing for long. The power of God and the miracle were so great that no one could keep silent. What, exactly, did Jesus expect? Jesus simply wanted these men to keep the details to themselves and think about them. He wanted them to worship quietly and treasure in their hearts what Jesus had done. He wanted them to focus on the spiritual aspect. Above all, he did not want more advertisement of his healing power. But the men could not contain themselves; they told everyone in that area what Jesus had done.

 LIFE APPLICATION – EASY DISOBEDIENCE
Sometimes we think that conversion will solve the world’s problems because converted people will obey Jesus and live under his commands. But here we see two faith-filled blind men, newly healed, who receive a direct command and almost immediately disobey. How easy it is!
Sometimes we mistakenly let joyous feelings become our guide, instead of listening to Jesus’ word. Or we think we know better (“He can’t be serious?!”) and so disregard Jesus’ words. Thus, gospel-preaching churches have supported slavery, apartheid, oppression, and bigotry—failing to obey the words of Jesus.
Take Jesus’ words seriously, and live by them. Give Jesus priority over your own hunches, preferences, and exuberance. Show your commitment to Jesus by obeying him.

9:32 While they were going out, a man who was demon-possessed and could not talk was brought to Jesus.NIV Jesus could hardly come or go without someone in need coming to him! This time, as Jesus and his disciples were leaving, a man who was demon-possessed and could not talk was brought to Jesus. The word translated “could not talk” is kophos, which can mean deaf, unable to talk, or both. Such disabilities are not always the work of demons, because Jesus healed many people of illness and disability without casting out demons. Matthew wanted his readers to understand, however, that in this situation a demon was at work. While Jesus was on earth, demonic forces seemed especially active. Although we cannot always be sure why or how demon possession occurs, it causes both physical and mental problems. In this case, the demon made the man unable to talk. (For more on demons and demon possession, see commentary on 8:28-34.)

9:33-34 And when the demon had been cast out, the one who had been mute spoke; and the crowds were amazed and said, “Never has anything like this been seen in Israel.”NRSV Matthew avoided detail about the exorcism of the demon (he had already established Jesus’ authority over demonic powers, see 8:16, 28-34) and focused instead on the reaction of the crowd. After Jesus cast out the demon, the mute man was able to speak.

Once again, the ever-present crowds were amazed. They had never seen anything like this. The teachings Matthew recorded in chapters 5-7 established Jesus’ authority; the miracles grouped in chapters 8 and 9 revealed Jesus’ power and divinity. The crowds saw God’s power at work in Jesus and began to realize that he was one of the greatest prophets.

The religious leaders, however, saw something entirely different: But the Pharisees said, “It is by the prince of demons that he drives out demons.”NIV In these words of the Pharisees, Matthew was showing the full extent of their rejection of Jesus. This chapter has the Pharisees accusing Jesus of four different sins: blasphemy, befriending outcasts, impiety, and serving Satan, the prince of demons. In Scripture Satan is constantly portrayed as the imitator of God, so the Pharisees may have been referring to this belief. They tried to explain Jesus away by saying that he was only imitating God but was really in league with Satan—and that’s why the demons obeyed him.

Matthew showed how Jesus was maligned by those who should have received him most gladly. Why did the Pharisees do this? (1) Jesus bypassed their religious authority. (2) He weakened their control over the people. (3) He challenged their cherished beliefs. (4) He exposed their insincere motives. While the Pharisees questioned, debated, and dissected Jesus, people were being healed and lives changed right in front of them. Their skepticism was based on jealousy of Jesus’ popularity. The opposition to Jesus was intensifying; Jesus was far too powerful and popular for the Pharisees’ comfort.

JESUS URGES THE DISCIPLES TO PRAY FOR WORKERS / 9:35-38

From 9:35 through 10:42, Matthew recorded a second discourse of Jesus, focusing on mission. (The first discourse was the Sermon on the Mount, recorded in chapters 5-7.) Jesus continued to share the Good News of the kingdom to all who would listen, and he exemplified the task and pattern his disciples would follow after his return to heaven.

9:35 Then Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people.NKJV This verse introduces the next discourse that Matthew recorded (from 9:35 through 10:42). This verse also mirrors 4:23, a verse that introduced the last recorded discourse in chapters 5 through 7.

Jesus went about all the cities and villages. Again, Jesus’ ministry is described as teaching, preaching, and healing. These were the three main aspects. “Teaching” shows Jesus’ concern for understanding; “preaching” shows his concern for commitment; and “healing” shows his concern for wholeness. His miracles of healing authenticated his teaching and preaching, proving that he truly was from God.

The Good News of the kingdom was that the promised and long-awaited Messiah had finally come. His healing miracles were a sign that his teaching was true.

9:36 But when He saw the multitudes, He was moved with compassion for them, because they were weary and scattered, like sheep having no shepherd.NKJV Wherever Jesus went, crowds gathered.

But when Jesus saw these multitudes, he was moved with compassion for them. The word “compassion” describes the deep inner mercy of God, often described in the Old Testament. The prophet Ezekiel compared Israel to sheep without a shepherd (Ezekiel 34:5, 6; see also Numbers 27:17; 1 Kings 22:17); Jesus saw the weary and scattered people as sheep having no shepherd. The word for “weary” can also mean “troubled,” “bewildered,” or “despondent.” The word for “scattered” is also “prostrate” or “thrown to the ground.” The two words are near Today I noticed for the first time that Jesus’ compassion on the multitudes was not only because they were many, but because they were scattered, divided, and distressed . . . So it is among our tribes [of Auca Indians]— scattered, but not many. Yet they merit His mercy. Thus God confirms my way with these encouragements from His Word.

Jim Elliott

 

synonyms that stress man’s helplessness without God. Jesus came to be the Shepherd, the one who could show people how to avoid life’s pitfalls (see John 10:14; 1 Peter 2:25). Jesus considered the Pharisees to have failed in leading the people to God, who were therefore left without a shepherd.

9:37-38 Then He said to His disciples, “The harvest truly is plentiful, but the laborers are few. Therefore pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest.”NKJV Jesus looked at the crowds following him and referred to them as a field ripe for harvest, but the laborers to bring in the harvest are few. These “laborers” were the disciples, then few in number. Jesus commanded his disciples to pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers. The “Lord of the harvest” refers to God. The verb translated “send out” is a strong term, meaning to “thrust forth.” In this context it speaks of a strong push to get workers into the field. These laborers must warn people of coming judgment and call them to repentance. Many people are ready to give their lives to Christ if someone would show them how. We are to pray that people will respond to this need for workers. Often, when we pray for something, God answers our prayers by using us. Be prepared for God to use you to show another person the way to him. Chapter 10 will describe this mission and what it will involve in more detail.

 LIFE APPLICATION – MISSIONS
Missions finds its motive in the heart of Jesus (“He was moved with compassion”) and its strength in the prayers of the church.
Churches which prefer projects to prayer are missing the power, and missions will eventually fizzle there. Churches where zeal comes from “saving the lost” or “rescuing the perishing”— with emphasis on hurry and efficiency because time is short— miss the heart of Jesus’ own motives.
The keys to success in missions are to grow closer to Jesus’ heart for people and to pray. Whatever else your church does, learn to love and learn to pray.

www.RidgeFellowship.com
Source:  Life Application Bible Commentary – Matthew.

Posted in Matthew | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment